7 Maryland opinions name it 3 courts 1984–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Maryland courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Mardirossian v. Paul Revere Life Insurancegreen1 sentence2021Id. at 645, n.2 . | 1 | 1 |
Odyniec v. Schneidergreen2 sentences2003We observed that under the statute, complaints of brutality are not investigated unless they are sworn, and that false complaints are subject to criminal liability; that prior to investigation, the officer has a right to be informed in writing of the nature of the investigation and of the officers involved in it; that the officer has a right to counsel during interrogation and to a record of the interrogation; that if an adversarial hearing is warranted after the investigation, it is held before at least three officers who were not involved in the investigation; that the officer has a right to 2003We observed that under the statute, complaints of brutality are not investigated unless they are sworn, and that false complaints are subject to criminal liability; that prior to investigation, the officer has a right to be informed in writing of the nature of the investigation and of the officers involved in it; that the officer has a right to counsel during interrogation and to a record of the interrogation; that if an adversarial hearing is warranted after the investigation, it is held before at least three officers who were not involved in the investigation; that the officer has a right to | 1 | 1 |
Adler v. Pomerleaugreen1 sentence1984United States v. Green, 284 A.2d 879, 882 (D.C.App.1971); Adler v. Pomer *713 leau, 313 F.Supp. 277, 286 (D.Md.1970) (3-judge court). | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Greengreen1 sentence1984United States v. Green, 284 A.2d 879, 882 (D.C.App.1971); Adler v. Pomer *713 leau, 313 F.Supp. 277, 286 (D.Md.1970) (3-judge court). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Hyson v. Montgomery County Council
green
1 sentence2025On June 9, 2020, the Board didn’t adjudicate disputed issues of fact based on an evidentiary record in an adversarial hearing, see Hyson, 242 Md. at 64–65, and Commissioner Coates points to no legal authority entitling her to a hearing or administrative appeal to challenge the Board’s action. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Bobby Watts, M.D. v. John H. Burkhart, M.D., Howard R. Foreman, M.D., Alvin J. Ingram, M.D., I. Lee Arnold, M.D., and Duane C. Budd, M.D.
green
2 sentences2019Examiners , 678 F.3d 737 , 745-46 (9th Cir. 2012) (quoting Watts v. Burkhart , 978 F.2d 269 , 277 (6th Cir. 1992) ). 17 The summary suspension of a medical license "is nothing more than a temporary expedient" ( Watts v. Burkhart , 978 F.2d at 276 ), followed promptly by an adversarial hearing "with a full complement of procedural safeguards." Buckwalter v. Nevada Bd. of Med. 2019Examiners , 678 F.3d 737 , 745-46 (9th Cir. 2012) (quoting Watts v. Burkhart , 978 F.2d 269 , 277 (6th Cir. 1992) ). 17 The summary suspension of a medical license "is nothing more than a temporary expedient" ( Watts v. Burkhart , 978 F.2d at 276 ), followed promptly by an adversarial hearing "with a full complement of procedural safeguards." Buckwalter v. Nevada Bd. of Med. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Buckwalter v. Nevada Board of Medical Examiners
green
2 sentences2019Examiners , 678 F.3d 737 , 745-46 (9th Cir. 2012) (quoting Watts v. Burkhart , 978 F.2d 269 , 277 (6th Cir. 1992) ). 17 The summary suspension of a medical license "is nothing more than a temporary expedient" ( Watts v. Burkhart , 978 F.2d at 276 ), followed promptly by an adversarial hearing "with a full complement of procedural safeguards." Buckwalter v. Nevada Bd. of Med. 2019Examiners , 678 F.3d at 743 . 18 *498 The defendants appear to argue that, because the underlying proceedings against Dr. Geier were "quasi-judicial" in nature, then absolute immunity should cover all actions of Board personnel in relation to those proceedings. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Brown v. State
green
2 sentences2017Ms. Brookman and Mr. Carnes contend that “sanctions imposed by Drug Court at a formal adversarial hearing are subject to appellate review over the final judgments of a criminal court.” (citing Brown v. State, 409 Md. 1, 9 , 971 A.2d 932 (2009)). 2017Ms. Brookman and Mr. Carnes contend that “sanctions imposed by Drug Court at a formal adversarial hearing are subject to appellate review over the final judgments of a criminal court.” (citing Brown v. State, 409 Md. 1, 9 , 971 A.2d 932 (2009)). | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Howitt v. Superior Court
green
1 sentence2002The California Court of Appeal held that the county counsel's office could represent a county agency in an adversarial hearing while, at the same time, serving as legal adviser for the decision-maker, provided that the representation followed certain guidelines. 3 Cal.App.4th at 1579 . | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.