6 South Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 1994–2011 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by South Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in South Carolina. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in South Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Snipes v. McAndrew
green
2 sentences1995In Snipes v. McAndrew, 280 S.C. 320 , 313 S.E.2d 294 (1984), a case concerning the reassignment of two principals to assistant principal positions, the court expressly held that "teachers" who have been transferred, reassigned, or demoted are not entitled to an adversarial hearing because entitlement to such a hearing is dependent upon dismissal or nonrenewal. 1995In Snipes v. McAndrew, 280 S.C. 320 , 313 S.E.2d 294 (1984), a case concerning the reassignment of two principals to assistant principal positions, the court expressly held that "teachers" who have been transferred, reassigned, or demoted are not entitled to an adversarial hearing because entitlement to such a hearing is dependent upon dismissal or nonrenewal. | 3 | 1994–1995 |
Goss v. Lopez
green
2 sentences2011Id. at 581 , 95 S.Ct. at 740 . 2011Id. at 581 , 95 S.Ct. at 740 . | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Nance v. Ozmint
green
2 sentences2011Nance , at 557-558, 626 S.E.2d at 883 . 2011Nance, at 557-558, 626 S.E.2d at 883 . *300 I would find no abuse of discretion in the suppression of Mr. Fraley's trial testimony, State v. Wright, supra , and would therefore affirm. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Mathews v. Eldridge
green
2 sentences1998In Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319 , 96 S.Ct. 893 , 47 L.Ed.2d 18 (1976), the Supreme Court articulated three identifiable factors for assessing the constitutional requirements of due process. 1998In Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319 , 96 S.Ct. 893 , 47 L.Ed.2d 18 (1976), the Supreme Court articulated three identifiable factors for assessing the constitutional requirements of due process. | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.