6 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1986–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Harris
green
2 sentences2017The principle that legal matters irrelevant to guilt should not be pressed upon the jury, which we explained in Harris, 258 La. at 729-31 , 247 So.2d 850 -51, applies even more forcefully in the context of the Habitual Offender Law. 2017The principle that legal matters irrelevant to guilt should not be pressed upon the jury, which we explained in Harris, 258 La. at 729-31 , 247 So.2d 850 -51, applies even more forcefully in the context of the Habitual Offender Law. | 2 | 2017–2017 |
Jeansonne v. Roy
neutral
2 sentences2014This court, in Jeansonne v. Roy, 13-741 (La.App. 3 Cir. 3/5/14) , — So.3d —, 2014 WL 852552 , addressed a similar issue where the plaintiff accused his ex-wife’s lawyer of deliberately misleading the trial court in order to obtain an exhumation order without obtaining the appropriate authorization and without holding an adversarial hearing. 2014This court, in Jeansonne v. Roy, 13-741 (La.App. 3 Cir. 3/5/14) , — So.3d —, 2014 WL 852552 , addressed a similar issue where the plaintiff accused his ex-wife’s lawyer of deliberately misleading the trial court in order to obtain an exhumation order without obtaining the appropriate authorization and without holding an adversarial hearing. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
State v. Lawson
green
1 sentence2011State v. Lawson, supra. Even though Russell’s 1996 guilty plea was his third trip “through the process,” the court minutes show that he had never participated in an adversarial hearing such as a preliminary exam, motion to suppress, or a trial on the merits; there is nothing from which we can infer he had prior exposure to the right of confrontation. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Freeman v. Guaranty Broadcasting Corp.
green
1 sentence2004In Freeman, supra, the appellate court gave the trial court guidance on how to proceed with an adversarial hearing for a public records request. | 1 | 2004–2004 |
State v. Walters
green
1 sentence1986State v. Walters, 440 So.2d 115 (La.1983). | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.