Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Michigan opinions name it 2 courts 1977–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Request for Advisory Opiniongreen2 sentences2019Careful consideration of the nature of our “judicial power” suggests we cannot issue advisory opinions after the effective date of the legislation being reviewed.17 Advisory opinions are “a departure from the historic judicial scheme.” Request for Advisory Opinion on Constitutionality of 1977 PA 108 , 402 Mich 83, 86 (1977). 2019Careful consideration of the nature of our “judicial power” suggests we cannot issue advisory opinions after the effective date of the legislation being reviewed.17 Advisory opinions are “a departure from the historic judicial scheme.” Request for Advisory Opinion on Constitutionality of 1977 PA 108 , 402 Mich 83, 86 (1977). | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Delaware v. Van Arsdall
green
2 sentences2025These factors include the importance of the witness’ testimony in the prosecution’s case, whether the testimony was cumulative, the presence or absence of evidence corroborating or contradicting the testimony of the witness on material points, . . . 9 The Kammeraad Court noted that an implicit waiver is really not a “waiver” but is more of a “forfeiture.” Kammeraad, 307 Mich App at 118 n 6. -11- and, of course, the overall strength of the prosecution’s case. [Delaware v Van Arsdall, 475 US 673, 684 ; 106 S Ct 1431 ; 89 L Ed 2d 674 (1986).] Vital to this analysis, defense counsel requested defe 2025These factors include the importance of the witness’ testimony in the prosecution’s case, whether the testimony was cumulative, the presence or absence of evidence corroborating or contradicting the testimony of the witness on material points, . . . 9 The Kammeraad Court noted that an implicit waiver is really not a “waiver” but is more of a “forfeiture.” Kammeraad, 307 Mich App at 118 n 6. -11- and, of course, the overall strength of the prosecution’s case. [Delaware v Van Arsdall, 475 US 673, 684 ; 106 S Ct 1431 ; 89 L Ed 2d 674 (1986).] Vital to this analysis, defense counsel requested defe | 1 | 2025–2025 |
People v. Kammeraad
green
1 sentence2025These factors include the importance of the witness’ testimony in the prosecution’s case, whether the testimony was cumulative, the presence or absence of evidence corroborating or contradicting the testimony of the witness on material points, . . . 9 The Kammeraad Court noted that an implicit waiver is really not a “waiver” but is more of a “forfeiture.” Kammeraad, 307 Mich App at 118 n 6. -11- and, of course, the overall strength of the prosecution’s case. [Delaware v Van Arsdall, 475 US 673, 684 ; 106 S Ct 1431 ; 89 L Ed 2d 674 (1986).] Vital to this analysis, defense counsel requested defe | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Berghuis v. Thompkins
green
2 sentences2019Berguis v Thompkins, 560 US 370 , 384; 130 S Ct 2250 ; 176 L Ed 2d 1098 (2010); North Carolina v Butler, 441 US 369, 373 ; 99 S Ct 1755 ; 60 L Ed 2d 286 (1979) (a person may waive his or her right to remain silent, as well as the right to counsel, absent an express written or oral statement of waiver). 2019Berguis v Thompkins, 560 US 370 , 384; 130 S Ct 2250 ; 176 L Ed 2d 1098 (2010); North Carolina v Butler, 441 US 369, 373 ; 99 S Ct 1755 ; 60 L Ed 2d 286 (1979) (a person may waive his or her right to remain silent, as well as the right to counsel, absent an express written or oral statement of waiver). | 1 | 2019–2019 |
North Carolina v. Butler
red
2 sentences2019Berguis v Thompkins, 560 US 370 , 384; 130 S Ct 2250 ; 176 L Ed 2d 1098 (2010); North Carolina v Butler, 441 US 369, 373 ; 99 S Ct 1755 ; 60 L Ed 2d 286 (1979) (a person may waive his or her right to remain silent, as well as the right to counsel, absent an express written or oral statement of waiver). 2019Berguis v Thompkins, 560 US 370 , 384; 130 S Ct 2250 ; 176 L Ed 2d 1098 (2010); North Carolina v Butler, 441 US 369, 373 ; 99 S Ct 1755 ; 60 L Ed 2d 286 (1979) (a person may waive his or her right to remain silent, as well as the right to counsel, absent an express written or oral statement of waiver). | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Robertson v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.
green
1 sentence2013As noted, “it is important to ensure that words in a statute not be ignored, treated as surplusage, or rendered nugatory.” Robertson, 465 Mich at 748 . | 1 | 2013–2013 |
People v. Hendershot
green
1 sentence2011Rather, it asserts that good faith is an implicit requirement that the 180-day rule imposes 8 People v Wolak, 153 Mich App 60, 64-65 ; 395 NW2d 240 (1986). 9 Ante at 12, quoting Hendershot, 357 Mich at 304 . 7 on the prosecuting attorney; all that is required of the prosecuting attorney under the rule is a good-faith effort to bring the case to trial. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
People v. Wolak
green
2 sentences2011Rather, it asserts that good faith is an implicit requirement that the 180-day rule imposes 8 People v Wolak, 153 Mich App 60, 64-65 ; 395 NW2d 240 (1986). 9 Ante at 12, quoting Hendershot, 357 Mich at 304 . 7 on the prosecuting attorney; all that is required of the prosecuting attorney under the rule is a good-faith effort to bring the case to trial. 2011Rather, it asserts that good faith is an implicit requirement that the 180-day rule imposes 8 People v Wolak, 153 Mich App 60, 64-65 ; 395 NW2d 240 (1986). 9 Ante at 12, quoting Hendershot, 357 Mich at 304 . 7 on the prosecuting attorney; all that is required of the prosecuting attorney under the rule is a good-faith effort to bring the case to trial. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
People v. Hallaway
green
2 sentences1977People v Hallaway, 389 Mich 265, 276 ; 205 NW2d 451 (1973); Dundas v Lansing, 75 Mich 499, 502 ; 42 NW 1011 ; 13 Am St Rep 457; 5 LRA 143 (1889); Brown v People, 17 Mich 429, 435 ; 97 Am Dec 195 (1868). 1977People v Hallaway, 389 Mich 265, 276 ; 205 NW2d 451 (1973); Dundas v Lansing, 75 Mich 499, 502 ; 42 NW 1011 ; 13 Am St Rep 457; 5 LRA 143 (1889); Brown v People, 17 Mich 429, 435 ; 97 Am Dec 195 (1868). | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Brown v. People
green
2 sentences1977People v Hallaway, 389 Mich 265, 276 ; 205 NW2d 451 (1973); Dundas v Lansing, 75 Mich 499, 502 ; 42 NW 1011 ; 13 Am St Rep 457; 5 LRA 143 (1889); Brown v People, 17 Mich 429, 435 ; 97 Am Dec 195 (1868). 1977People v Hallaway, 389 Mich 265, 276 ; 205 NW2d 451 (1973); Dundas v Lansing, 75 Mich 499, 502 ; 42 NW 1011 ; 13 Am St Rep 457; 5 LRA 143 (1889); Brown v People, 17 Mich 429, 435 ; 97 Am Dec 195 (1868). | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Dundas v. City of Lansing
green
2 sentences1977People v Hallaway, 389 Mich 265, 276 ; 205 NW2d 451 (1973); Dundas v Lansing, 75 Mich 499, 502 ; 42 NW 1011 ; 13 Am St Rep 457; 5 LRA 143 (1889); Brown v People, 17 Mich 429, 435 ; 97 Am Dec 195 (1868). 1977People v Hallaway, 389 Mich 265, 276 ; 205 NW2d 451 (1973); Dundas v Lansing, 75 Mich 499, 502 ; 42 NW 1011 ; 13 Am St Rep 457; 5 LRA 143 (1889); Brown v People, 17 Mich 429, 435 ; 97 Am Dec 195 (1868). | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.