adequacy warning in Oklahoma

2010Id. at 91 . [12] "The adequacy of warnings is determined by state law." Edwards, 1997 OK 22, ¶ 17 , 933 P.2d at 303 . *559 ¶ 20 IsoTis contended the warnings adequately warned Dr. Smith of the potential for an allergic reaction such as that experienced by Plaintiff.

2010Id. at 91 . [12] "The adequacy of warnings is determined by state law." Edwards, 1997 OK 22, ¶ 17 , 933 P.2d at 303 . *559 ¶ 20 IsoTis contended the warnings adequately warned Dr. Smith of the potential for an allergic reaction such as that experienced by Plaintiff.

2010Id. at 91 . [12] "The adequacy of warnings is determined by state law." Edwards, 1997 OK 22, ¶ 17 , 933 P.2d at 303 . *559 ¶ 20 IsoTis contended the warnings adequately warned Dr. Smith of the potential for an allergic reaction such as that experienced by Plaintiff.

2010Id. at 91 . [12] "The adequacy of warnings is determined by state law." Edwards, 1997 OK 22, ¶ 17 , 933 P.2d at 303 . *559 ¶ 20 IsoTis contended the warnings adequately warned Dr. Smith of the potential for an allergic reaction such as that experienced by Plaintiff.

2009Such representation not only constitutes a breach of professional ethics and invites disrespect for the integrity of the court, but it is also detrimental to the independent interest of the trial judge to be free from future attacks over the adequacy of the waiver or the fairness of the proceedings in his own court and the subtle problems implicating the defendant's comprehension of the waiyer." T71 The trial judges of this state are vested with the responsibility to ensure that counsel appearing before them adhere to the standards of effective assistance of counsel set out in Strickland v. Wa

2009Such representation not only constitutes a breach of professional ethics and invites disrespect for the integrity of the court, but it is also detrimental to the independent interest of the trial judge to be free from future attacks over the adequacy of the waiver or the fairness of the proceedings in his own court and the subtle problems implicating the defendant's comprehension of the waiyer." T71 The trial judges of this state are vested with the responsibility to ensure that counsel appearing before them adhere to the standards of effective assistance of counsel set out in Strickland v. Wa

2003Allowing the jury to apportion the parties' relative fault and/or determine the propriety of punitive damages on the basis that the train was traveling at an excessive rate of speed would "completely deprive the Secretary of the power to preempt state common law." Easterwood, 507 U.S. at 675 , 118 S.Ct. 1782 . §37 To allow Pearl to admit evidence that would permit the jury to apportion the Railroad's fault on the basis of such a challenge is akin to allowing Pearl to improperly submit a claim for negligence based upon adequacy of warnings, excessive train speed and alleged dangerous conditions

2003Allowing the jury to apportion the parties' relative fault and/or determine the propriety of punitive damages on the basis that the train was traveling at an excessive rate of speed would "completely deprive the Secretary of the power to preempt state common law." Easterwood, 507 U.S. at 675 , 118 S.Ct. 1782 . §37 To allow Pearl to admit evidence that would permit the jury to apportion the Railroad's fault on the basis of such a challenge is akin to allowing Pearl to improperly submit a claim for negligence based upon adequacy of warnings, excessive train speed and alleged dangerous conditions

2003Allowing the jury to apportion the parties' relative fault and/or determine the propriety of punitive damages on the basis that the train was traveling at an excessive rate of speed would "completely deprive the Secretary of the power to preempt state common law." Easterwood, 507 U.S. at 675 , 118 S.Ct. 1782 . §37 To allow Pearl to admit evidence that would permit the jury to apportion the Railroad's fault on the basis of such a challenge is akin to allowing Pearl to improperly submit a claim for negligence based upon adequacy of warnings, excessive train speed and alleged dangerous conditions

1999Schlitz Brewing Co., 605 F.2d 990 (7th Cir.1979), cert. denied 444 U.S; 1102, 100 S.Ct. 1067 , 62 L.Ed.2d 787 (1980), illustrates this point.

1999Schlitz Brewing Co., 605 F.2d 990 (7th Cir.1979), cert. denied 444 U.S; 1102, 100 S.Ct. 1067 , 62 L.Ed.2d 787 (1980), illustrates this point.

1999Schlitz Brewing Co., 605 F.2d 990 (7th Cir.1979), cert. denied 444 U.S; 1102, 100 S.Ct. 1067 , 62 L.Ed.2d 787 (1980), illustrates this point.

1984In Richards v. Upjohn Co., 625 P.2d at 1196 , the New Mexico Court of Appeals listed five “relevant standards concerning the adequacy of warning about a dangerous drug” and went the furthest toward fixing criteria for judging drug warning adequacy.

1975Specifically, it rejected the conclusions on the point as reached in United States v. Cassell (7th Cir.1971), 452 F.2d 533 and in United States v. Garcia (9th Cir.1970), 431 F.2d 134 , two of the authorities relied on heavily by the petitioner.

1975Specifically, it rejected the conclusions on the point as reached in United States v. Cassell (7th Cir. 1971), 452 F.2d 533 and in United States v. Garcia (9th Cir. 1970), 431 F.2d 134 , two of the authorities relied on heavily by the petitioner.

1975Specifically, it rejected the conclusions on the point as reached in United States v. Cassell (7th Cir.1971), 452 F.2d 533 and in United States v. Garcia (9th Cir.1970), 431 F.2d 134 , two of the authorities relied on heavily by the petitioner.

1975Specifically, it rejected the conclusions on the point as reached in United States v. Cassell (7th Cir. 1971), 452 F.2d 533 and in United States v. Garcia (9th Cir. 1970), 431 F.2d 134 , two of the authorities relied on heavily by the petitioner.

1975The adequacy of the warning is not jeopardized by the absence of such embellishments.' "The Second Circuit in Massimo v. United States (2nd Cir.1972), 463 F.2d 1171, 1174 , cert. denied, 409 U.S. 117 , 93 S.Ct. 920 , 34 L.Ed.2d 700 , where a warning similar to that in this case was at issue, adopted the view stated in Lacy on the adequacy of the warning.

1975The adequacy of the warning is not jeopardized by the absence of such embellishments.’ “The Second Circuit in Massimo v. United States (2nd Cir. 1972), 463 F.2d 1171, 1174 , cert. denied, 409 U.S. 117 , 93 S.Ct. 920 , 34 L.Ed.2d 700 , where a warning similar to that in this case was at issue, adopted the view stated in Lacy on the adequacy of the warning.

1975The adequacy of the warning is not jeopardized by the absence of such embellishments.' "The Second Circuit in Massimo v. United States (2nd Cir.1972), 463 F.2d 1171, 1174 , cert. denied, 409 U.S. 117 , 93 S.Ct. 920 , 34 L.Ed.2d 700 , where a warning similar to that in this case was at issue, adopted the view stated in Lacy on the adequacy of the warning.

1975The adequacy of the warning is not jeopardized by the absence of such embellishments.’ “The Second Circuit in Massimo v. United States (2nd Cir. 1972), 463 F.2d 1171, 1174 , cert. denied, 409 U.S. 117 , 93 S.Ct. 920 , 34 L.Ed.2d 700 , where a warning similar to that in this case was at issue, adopted the view stated in Lacy on the adequacy of the warning.

1975The adequacy of the warning is not jeopardized by the absence of such embellishments.' "The Second Circuit in Massimo v. United States (2nd Cir.1972), 463 F.2d 1171, 1174 , cert. denied, 409 U.S. 117 , 93 S.Ct. 920 , 34 L.Ed.2d 700 , where a warning similar to that in this case was at issue, adopted the view stated in Lacy on the adequacy of the warning.

1975The adequacy of the warning is not jeopardized by the absence of such embellishments.’ “The Second Circuit in Massimo v. United States (2nd Cir. 1972), 463 F.2d 1171, 1174 , cert. denied, 409 U.S. 117 , 93 S.Ct. 920 , 34 L.Ed.2d 700 , where a warning similar to that in this case was at issue, adopted the view stated in Lacy on the adequacy of the warning.