Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
31 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1954–2024 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Bloxom v. Bloxomred2 sentences2018Several factors come into play in determining the adequacy of the warning, namely: (1) "the severity of the danger," (2) the likelihood of successful communication of the warning to foreseeable consumers, (3) "the intensity and form of the warning," and (4) "the cost of improving the strength or mode of the warning." Bloxom v. Bloxom , 512 So.2d 839 , 844 (La.1987). 2016In Bloxom v. Bloxom, 512 So.2d 839, 850-51 (La.1987), 4 the Louisiana, Supreme Court had this to say about adequate warnings in an owner’s manual, “Accordingly, even if an adequate warning of the particular danger in this case had been given by a proper provision in the manual, such a warning would have been futile because Lonnie Bloxom did not read the manual before parking his car over combustible materials.” |1BIn fact, during this trial counsel for plaintiff attempted to question Mr. Glen Vamvoras about warnings in general, which would include any warnings that may have, appeared in the Te | 2 | 4 |
Smallwood v. IL Central RR Cogreen1 sentence2004See Smallwood v. Illinois Central Railroad Co., 203 F.Supp.2d 686 (S.D.Miss.2002), judgment vacated on other grounds (fraudulent joinder), 342 F.3d 400 (5th Cir.2003), reh'g denied, 352 F.3d 220 (5th Cir.2003), reh'ing en banc granted, opinion vacated, 355 F.3d 357 (5th Cir.2003), finding a state tort claim against the Mississippi Department of Transportation challenging the adequacy of warnings at a crossing preempted under federal law. | 1 | 1 |
Smallwood v. Illinois Central Railroadgreen1 sentence2004See Smallwood v. Illinois Central Railroad Co., 203 F.Supp.2d 686 (S.D.Miss.2002), judgment vacated on other grounds (fraudulent joinder), 342 F.3d 400 (5th Cir.2003), reh'g denied, 352 F.3d 220 (5th Cir.2003), reh'ing en banc granted, opinion vacated, 355 F.3d 357 (5th Cir.2003), finding a state tort claim against the Mississippi Department of Transportation challenging the adequacy of warnings at a crossing preempted under federal law. | 1 | 1 |
Fifth Third Bank Ex Rel. Bozik v. CSX Corp.green1 sentence2004See also Fifth Third Bank v. CSX Corporation, 306 F.Supp.2d 841 (N.D.Ind.2004), finding state tort claim against county for inadequate warning devices at crossing preempted under the rationale of Shanklin . | 1 | 1 |
Smallwood v. Illinois Central Railroadgreen1 sentence2004See Smallwood v. Illinois Central Railroad Co., 203 F.Supp.2d 686 (S.D.Miss.2002), judgment vacated on other grounds (fraudulent joinder), 342 F.3d 400 (5th Cir.2003), reh'g denied, 352 F.3d 220 (5th Cir.2003), reh'ing en banc granted, opinion vacated, 355 F.3d 357 (5th Cir.2003), finding a state tort claim against the Mississippi Department of Transportation challenging the adequacy of warnings at a crossing preempted under federal law. | 1 | 1 |
Smallwood v. Illinois Central Railroadgreen1 sentence2004See Smallwood v. Illinois Central Railroad Co., 203 F.Supp.2d 686 (S.D.Miss.2002), judgment vacated on other grounds (fraudulent joinder), 342 F.3d 400 (5th Cir.2003), reh'g denied, 352 F.3d 220 (5th Cir.2003), reh'ing en banc granted, opinion vacated, 355 F.3d 357 (5th Cir.2003), finding a state tort claim against the Mississippi Department of Transportation challenging the adequacy of warnings at a crossing preempted under federal law. | 1 | 1 |
Kinney v. Hutchinsongreen1 sentence2000See Kinney v. Hutchinson, 468 So.2d 714, 716-18 (La.App. 5th Cir.), writ denied, 472 So.2d 35 (La.1985); Anderson v. McNeilab, Inc., 831 F.2d 92, 93 (5th Cir.1987); and Bealer v. Hoffman-La Roche, Inc., 729 F.Supp. 43, 44-45 (E.D.La.1990). | 1 | 1 |
Kinney v. Hutchinsongreen1 sentence2000See Kinney v. Hutchinson, 468 So.2d 714, 716-18 (La.App. 5th Cir.), writ denied, 472 So.2d 35 (La.1985); Anderson v. McNeilab, Inc., 831 F.2d 92, 93 (5th Cir.1987); and Bealer v. Hoffman-La Roche, Inc., 729 F.Supp. 43, 44-45 (E.D.La.1990). | 1 | 1 |
Bealer v. Hoffman-La Roche, Inc.green2 sentences2000Thus, the adequacy of warnings becomes a question of law where the warning is "accurate, clear, and unambiguous." Bealer, 729 F.Supp. at 44 . 2000See Kinney v. Hutchinson, 468 So.2d 714, 716-18 (La.App. 5th Cir.), writ denied, 472 So.2d 35 (La.1985); Anderson v. McNeilab, Inc., 831 F.2d 92, 93 (5th Cir.1987); and Bealer v. Hoffman-La Roche, Inc., 729 F.Supp. 43, 44-45 (E.D.La.1990). | 1 | 1 |
Annette Lorraine Anderson v. McNeilab Inc., D/B/A McNeil Pharmaceuticalgreen1 sentence2000See Kinney v. Hutchinson, 468 So.2d 714, 716-18 (La.App. 5th Cir.), writ denied, 472 So.2d 35 (La.1985); Anderson v. McNeilab, Inc., 831 F.2d 92, 93 (5th Cir.1987); and Bealer v. Hoffman-La Roche, Inc., 729 F.Supp. 43, 44-45 (E.D.La.1990). | 1 | 1 |
| Ellen L. Stapleton v. Kawasaki Heavy Industries, Ltd. And Kawasaki Motors Corp., U.S.A.green | 1 | 1 |
| Johnson v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. AND DEV.green | 1 | 1 |
| Taylor AG Industries v. Pure-Grogreen | 1 | 1 |
| Arnold v. Kempgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Miller v. Loyola University of New Orleans
green
2 sentences2021This is a task best handled by the universities themselves." Miller, 829 So. 2d at 1061 . 2021This is a task best handled by the universities themselves." Miller, 829 So. 2d at 1061 . | 2 | 2021–2021 |
State ex rel. Montgomery v. State
neutral
2 sentences2018State v. Montgomery , 10-1151 (La.App. 3 Cir. 4/6/11) , 2011 WL 1266588 (unpublished opinion), writ denied , 11-1742 (La. 5/4/12), 88 So.3d 449 , cert denied , --- U.S. ----, 134 S.Ct. 95 , 187 L.Ed.2d 71 (2013). 2018State v. Montgomery , 10-1151 (La.App. 3 Cir. 4/6/11) (unpublished opinion), writ denied , 11-1742 (La. 5/4/12), 88 So.3d 449 , cert denied , 571 U.S. 842 , 134 S.Ct. 95 , 187 L.Ed.2d 71 (2013). | 2 | 2018–2018 |
Montgomery v. Louisiana
neutral
2 sentences2018State v. Montgomery , 10-1151 (La.App. 3 Cir. 4/6/11) , 2011 WL 1266588 (unpublished opinion), writ denied , 11-1742 (La. 5/4/12), 88 So.3d 449 , cert denied , --- U.S. ----, 134 S.Ct. 95 , 187 L.Ed.2d 71 (2013). 2018State v. Montgomery , 10-1151 (La.App. 3 Cir. 4/6/11) , 2011 WL 1266588 (unpublished opinion), writ denied , 11-1742 (La. 5/4/12), 88 So.3d 449 , cert denied , --- U.S. ----, 134 S.Ct. 95 , 187 L.Ed.2d 71 (2013). | 2 | 2018–2018 |
Calhoun v. Hoffman-La Roche, Inc.
green
2 sentences2004Calhoun v. Hoffman-LaRoche, Inc., 98-2770, p. 6 (La.App. 1 Cir. 2/18/00), 768 So.2d 57 , rehearing granted on other grounds, 98-2770 (La.App. 1 Cir. 2/18/00) , 768 So.2d 57 , writ denied, 00-1223 (La.6/23/00), 765 So.2d 1041 . 2004Calhoun v. Hoffman-LaRoche, Inc., 98-2770, p. 6 (La.App. 1 Cir. 2/18/00), 768 So.2d 57 , rehearing granted on other grounds, 98-2770 (La.App. 1 Cir. 2/18/00) , 768 So.2d 57 , writ denied, 00-1223 (La.6/23/00), 765 So.2d 1041 . | 2 | 2000–2004 |
Calhoun v. Hoffman-La Roche, Inc.
neutral
2 sentences2004Calhoun v. Hoffman-LaRoche, Inc., 98-2770, p. 6 (La.App. 1 Cir. 2/18/00), 768 So.2d 57 , rehearing granted on other grounds, 98-2770 (La.App. 1 Cir. 2/18/00) , 768 So.2d 57 , writ denied, 00-1223 (La.6/23/00), 765 So.2d 1041 . 2000Calhoun v. Hoffman-LaRoche, Inc., 98-2770, p. 6 (La.App. 1 Cir. 2/18/00), 768 So.2d 57 , rehearing granted on other grounds, 98-2770 (La.App. 1 Cir. *39 2/18/00), 768 So.2d 57 , writ denied, 00-1223 (La.6/23/00), 765 So.2d 1041 . | 2 | 2000–2004 |
Lee v. Missouri Pacific RR Co.
green
2 sentences2000Co., 540 So.2d 287 (La.1989), the Louisiana Supreme Court allowed a discussion of train speed to be used to determine the adequacy of warning signs at train crossings. 1997Co., 540 So.2d 287 (La.1989), the Louisiana Supreme Court allowed a discussion of train speed to be used to determine the adequacy of warning signs at train crossings. | 2 | 1997–2000 |
CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Easterwood
red
2 sentences2000In Easterwood , the Court explained that "federal pre-emption will lie only if the federal regulations substantially subsume the subject matter of the relevant state law." 507 U.S. at 664 , 113 S.Ct. at 1738 . 2000In Easterwood , the Court explained that "federal pre-emption will lie only if the federal regulations substantially subsume the subject matter of the relevant state law." 507 U.S. at 664 , 113 S.Ct. at 1738 . | 2 | 2000–2000 |
Andries v. General Motors Corp., Delco
green
2 sentences1991In Andries v. General Motors Corp., Delco Batteries Division, 444 So.2d 1180 (La.1983), the Supreme Court addressed the duty to warn: Proper placement of a warning label so that it is clearly visible is one factor to be considered in determining the adequacy of the warning in a products liability case. 1984In the recent case of Andries v. General Motors Corporation, 444 So.2d 1180 (La.1983), addressing the duty to warn [which it found had not been violated] our state supreme court noted: "Proper placement of a warning label so that it is clearly visible is one factor to be considered in determining the adequacy of the warning in a products liability case. | 2 | 1984–1991 |
Prentiss Baker and Sheryl Wiginton, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Phc-Minden, L.P. D/B/A Minden Medical Center
green
1 sentence2024Baker, 14-2243 at p. 22, 167 So. 3d at 543-544 . | 1 | 2024–2024 |
State v. Queen
neutral
1 sentence2018Recently, in State v. Queen , 17-599, pp. 3-6 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1/ 4/18), 237 So.3d 547 , 551 (alterations in original), this court addressed this issue on error patent review: In conducting an error patent review of the waiver of the right to counsel, this court has examined the adequacy of the waiver. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Faretta v. California
green
2 sentences2014This is because before a court can allow a defendant to give up his constitutionally-protected right to counsel, the waiver must be given “knowingly and intelligently.” Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806 , 95 S.Ct. 2525 , 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975). 2014This is because before a court can allow a defendant to give up his constitutionally-protected right to counsel, the waiver must be given “knowingly and intelligently.” Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806 , 95 S.Ct. 2525 , 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975). | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Schexnayder v. Entergy Louisiana, Inc.
green
2 sentences2009Schexnayder v. Entergy Louisiana, Inc., 04-636, p. 9 (La.App. 5 Cir. 3/29/05), 899 So.2d 107, 115 , writ denied, 05-1255 (La.12/9/05), 916 So.2d 1058 quoting Duhe v. Texaco, Inc., 99-2002 (La. 2009Schexnayder v. Entergy Louisiana, Inc., 04-636, p. 9 (La.App. 5 Cir. 3/29/05), 899 So.2d 107, 115 , writ denied, 05-1255 (La.12/9/05), 916 So.2d 1058 quoting Duhe v. Texaco, Inc., 99-2002 (La. | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Schexnayder v. Entergy Louisiana, Inc.
neutral
2 sentences2009Schexnayder v. Entergy Louisiana, Inc., 04-636, p. 9 (La.App. 5 Cir. 3/29/05), 899 So.2d 107, 115 , writ denied, 05-1255 (La.12/9/05), 916 So.2d 1058 quoting Duhe v. Texaco, Inc., 99-2002 (La. 2009Schexnayder v. Entergy Louisiana, Inc., 04-636, p. 9 (La.App. 5 Cir. 3/29/05), 899 So.2d 107, 115 , writ denied, 05-1255 (La.12/9/05), 916 So.2d 1058 quoting Duhe v. Texaco, Inc., 99-2002 (La. | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Duhe v. Texaco, Inc.
green
1 sentence2008Id. | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Furlough v. Union Pacific RR Co.
green
1 sentence2004Scope of Preemption In Furlough v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, 33,658 (La.App.2d Cir.8/31/00), 766 So.2d 751 , writ denied, 2000-2929 (La.1/12/01), 781 So.2d 556 , this court held that a claim against a railroad company as to the adequacy of warning devices at a crossing was preempted by regulations enacted through the Federal Highway Administration ("FHWA") in implementing the Federal Railway-Highway Crossings Program (Crossings Program)., 23 U.S.C. § 130 . | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Furlough v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.
neutral
1 sentence2004Scope of Preemption In Furlough v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, 33,658 (La.App.2d Cir.8/31/00), 766 So.2d 751 , writ denied, 2000-2929 (La.1/12/01), 781 So.2d 556 , this court held that a claim against a railroad company as to the adequacy of warning devices at a crossing was preempted by regulations enacted through the Federal Highway Administration ("FHWA") in implementing the Federal Railway-Highway Crossings Program (Crossings Program)., 23 U.S.C. § 130 . | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Belle Pass Terminal, Inc. v. Jolin, Inc.
green
1 sentence2003The adequacy of the instruction "must be determined in light of the instruction as a whole." Belle Pass Terminal, Inc. v. Jolin, Inc., 92-1554, p. 36 (La.App. 1 Cir. 3/11/94), 634 So.2d 466, 488 , writ denied, 94-0906 (La.6/17/94), 638 So.2d 1094 . | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Belle Pass Terminal, Inc. v. Jolin, Inc.
green
1 sentence2003The adequacy of the instruction "must be determined in light of the instruction as a whole." Belle Pass Terminal, Inc. v. Jolin, Inc., 92-1554, p. 36 (La.App. 1 Cir. 3/11/94), 634 So.2d 466, 488 , writ denied, 94-0906 (La.6/17/94), 638 So.2d 1094 . | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Phillips v. ALLIANCE CAS. & REINS. CO.
neutral
1 sentence2002Phillips v. Alliance Casualty and Reinsurance Company, 95-2161, p. 3 (La.App. 1 Cir. 11/8/96), 689 So.2d 481, 483 . | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Lytell v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.
green
1 sentence1997The lower court did not err in refusing to send this case to trial on that issue alone. [1] The defendant calls our attention to Lytell v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 439 So.2d 542 (La.App. 1 Cir.1983). | 1 | 1997–1997 |
| Johnson v. STATE THROUGH DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION AND DEVELOPMENT green | 1 | 1996–1996 |
| Papas v. Upjohn Co. green | 1 | 1996–1996 |
| Sons v. Delaune green | 1 | 1995–1995 |
| Sons v. Delaune green | 1 | 1995–1995 |
| In Re Order on Prosecution of Cr. App. green | 1 | 1993–1993 |
| State v. Lynch green | 1 | 1993–1993 |
| United States v. Potter neutral | 1 | 1991–1991 |
| Schneckloth v. Bustamonte green | 1 | 1991–1991 |
| Reyes v. Wyeth Laboratories green | 1 | 1985–1985 |
| Department of Highways v. Fogleman neutral | 1 | 1954–1954 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.