Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 South Dakota opinions name it 1 courts 1929–1998 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by South Dakota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Woodsgreen1 sentence1998Relying upon SDCL 22-16-34 and dictum from State v. Woods, 374 N.W.2d 92, 97 (S.D.1985), Pellegrino proposed and the court refused an instruction stating, “Any force used to repel a felonious intruder in your home is considered to be lawful force.” This proposal might be correct if we construe the statute rigidly. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in South Dakota. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Rash
green
1 sentence1994The trial court refused this instruction based upon the rationale of State v. Rash, 294 N.W.2d 416 (S.D.1980). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Zepp v. Hofmann
green
2 sentences1993"The trial court refused to rule on the objection stating that it was waived by failing to object at the deposition." Id. at 32 . 1993The trial court refused to rule on the objection stating that it was waived by failing to object at the deposition.” Id. at 32 . | 1 | 1993–1993 |
State v. Huth
green
2 sentences1987In State v. Huth, 334 N.W.2d 485 (S.D.1983) the defendant requested a similar instruction. 1987In State v. Huth, 334 N.W.2d 485 (S.D. 1983) the defendant requested a similar instruction. | 1 | 1987–1987 |
State v. Douglas
green
2 sentences1986In Douglas , the refused instruction stated in part, “... you should examine [the accomplice’s] testimony with great care and caution, before you accept it as true.” 70 S.D. at 223 , 16 N.W.2d at 499 . 1986In Douglas , the refused instruction stated in part, “... you should examine [the accomplice’s] testimony with great care and caution, before you accept it as true.” 70 S.D. at 223 , 16 N.W.2d at 499 . | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Bassil v. Fay
green
2 sentences1974Cf. Bassil v. Fay, 267 Wis. 265 , 64 N.W.2d 826 . 1974Cf. Bassil v. Fay, 267 Wis. 265 , 64 N.W.2d 826 . | 1 | 1974–1974 |
State v. Wilcox
green
1 sentence1929The court refused an instruction taken from the case of State v. Wilcox, 48 S. D. 289, 204 N. W. 369 , which this court held was error to refuse in that case. | 1 | 1929–1929 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.