Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Wisconsin opinions name it 2 courts 1977–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Wisconsin courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Hessgreen2 sentences2015See State v. Hess, 2010 WI 82, ¶¶ 38-52 , 327 Wis. 2d 524 , 785 N.W.2d 568 (explaining the history of the Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule in federal courts and Wisconsin). 2015See State v. Hess, 2010 WI 82, ¶¶ 38-52 , 327 Wis. 2d 524 , 785 N.W.2d 568 (explaining the history of the Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule in federal courts and Wisconsin). | 2 | 2 |
Illinois v. Krullgreen2 sentences2001In Krull , the officers relied upon a statute that was later held unconstitutional as violative of the Fourth Amendment; however, the "Supreme Court concluded that the evidence should be admitted under a good-faith exception to the Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule." Ward, 2000 WI 3, ¶ 50 (citing Krull, 480 U.S. at 346, 360 ). 2001In Krull , the officers relied upon a statute that was later held unconstitutional as violative of the Fourth Amendment; however, the "Supreme Court concluded that the evidence should be admitted under a good-faith exception to the Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule." Ward, 2000 WI 3, ¶ 50 (citing Krull, 480 U.S. at 346, 360 ). | 2 | 2 |
Weeks v. United Statesred2 sentences2010Weeks v. United States, 232 U.S. 383, 387-88 , 34 S.Ct. 341 , 58 L.Ed. 652 (1914). 2010Weeks v. United States, 232 U.S. 383, 387-88 (1914). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Wardgreen2 sentences2001In Krull , the officers relied upon a statute that was later held unconstitutional as violative of the Fourth Amendment; however, the "Supreme Court concluded that the evidence should be admitted under a good-faith exception to the Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule." Ward, 2000 WI 3, ¶ 50 (citing Krull, 480 U.S. at 346, 360 ). 2001In Krull , the officers relied upon a statute that was later held unconstitutional as violative of the Fourth Amendment; however, the "Supreme Court concluded that the evidence should be admitted under a good-faith exception to the Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule." Ward, 2000 WI 3, ¶ 50 (citing Krull, 480 U.S. at 346, 360 ). | 1 | 1 |
Massachusetts v. Sheppardgreen2 sentences2001See also Massachusetts v. Sheppard, 468 U.S. 981 (1984). 2001See also Massachusetts v. Sheppard, 468 U.S. 981 (1984). | 1 | 1 |
Oregon v. Elstadgreen1 sentence1997"The purpose of the Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule is to deter unreasonable searches, no matter how probative their fruits." Oregon v. Elstad, 470 U.S. 298, 306 (1985). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Wisconsin. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Leon
green
2 sentences2001In Leon , the United States Supreme Court formulated an exception to the Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule where a police officer relied in good faith upon a search warrant issued by an independent and neutral magistrate. 468 U.S. at 919-20 . 9 Leon involved the suppression of evidence obtained by way of a search warrant. 468 U.S. at 900 . 2001In Leon , the United States Supreme Court formulated an exception to the Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule where a police officer relied in good faith upon a search warrant issued by an independent and neutral magistrate. 468 U.S. at 919-20 . 9 Leon involved the suppression of evidence obtained by way of a search warrant. 468 U.S. at 900 . | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Mapp v. Ohio
green
1 sentence1977That decision antedated by almost forty years the United States Supreme Court’s mandate in Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961), which applied the Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule to the states. | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.