Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Idaho opinions name it 2 courts 1991–2024 5 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Kysargreen2 sentences2024State v. Kysar, 114 Idaho 457, 459 , 757 P.2d 720, 722 (Ct. App. 1988). 2024State v. Kysar, 114 Idaho 457, 459 , 757 P.2d 720, 722 (Ct. App. 1988). | 2 | 2 |
White v. Stategreen2 sentences1991See White v. State, 187 Ga.App. 301 , 370 S.E.2d 50 (1988); State v. Medford, 489 So.2d 957 (La.App.1986). 1991See White v. State, 187 Ga.App. 301 , 370 S.E.2d 50 (1988); State v. Medford, 489 So.2d 957 (La.App.1986). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Huntley
green
2 sentences2023As this Court recently explained in Huntley, there are multiple factors that constitute “indicia of reliability,” which are considered in the totality of the circumstances analysis: A non-exhaustive list of factors under the totality analysis includes whether: (1) the informant reveals his or her identity; (2) the informant reveals the basis of his or her knowledge; (3) the location of the informant is known; (4) the information was based on personal knowledge of events as they occurred; (5) the information was subject to “immediate confirmation or corroboration by police”; (6) the informant h 2023As this Court recently explained in Huntley, there are multiple factors that constitute “indicia of reliability,” which are considered in the totality of the circumstances analysis: A non-exhaustive list of factors under the totality analysis includes whether: (1) the informant reveals his or her identity; (2) the informant reveals the basis of his or her knowledge; (3) the location of the informant is known; (4) the information was based on personal knowledge of events as they occurred; (5) the information was subject to “immediate confirmation or corroboration by police”; (6) the informant h | 2 | 2023–2023 |
Alabama v. White
green
1 sentence2022Id. (citing White, 496 U.S. at 331–32). | 1 | 2022–2022 |
State v. Bishop
green
2 sentences2022Bishop, 146 Idaho at 812 , 203 P.3d at 1211 . 2022Bishop, 146 Idaho at 812 , 203 P.3d at 1211 . | 1 | 2022–2022 |
State v. Medford
green
1 sentence1991See White v. State, 187 Ga.App. 301 , 370 S.E.2d 50 (1988); State v. Medford, 489 So.2d 957 (La.App.1986). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.