Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 2001–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Teaching Our Posterity Success, Inc. v. Indiana Department of Education and Indiana State Board of Educationgreen1 sentence2017Teaching Our Posterity Success, Inc. v. Ind. Dept. of Educ., 20 N.E.3d 149, 151 (Ind.2014). | 1 | 1 |
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Kimegreen2 sentences2016“The federal doctrine of equitable estoppel applies to federal statutes of limitation.” F.D.I.C. v. Kime, 12 F.Supp.3d 1113, 1119 (S.D.Ind.2014). 2016“The federal doctrine of equitable estoppel applies to federal statutes of limitation.” F.D.I.C. v. Kime, 12 F.Supp.3d 1113, 1119 (S.D. | 1 | 1 |
City of Boerne v. Floresred2 sentences2001In the ten years since Smith, the Supreme Court has not again addressed the hybrid claim issue except for Justice Kennedy's brief observation that "[the only instances where a neutral, generally applicable law had failed to pass muster, the Smith court noted, were cases in which other constitutional protections were at stake." City of Boerne v. Flores, 521 U.S. 507, 518-14 , 117 S.Ct. 2157, 2161 , 188 L.Ed.2d 624 , 634 (1997). 2001In the ten years since Smith, the Supreme Court has not again addressed the hybrid claim issue except for Justice Kennedy's brief observation that "[the only instances where a neutral, generally applicable law had failed to pass muster, the Smith court noted, were cases in which other constitutional protections were at stake." City of Boerne v. Flores, 521 U.S. 507, 518-14 , 117 S.Ct. 2157, 2161 , 188 L.Ed.2d 624 , 634 (1997). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
McKune v. Lile
green
2 sentences2014Under Justice Kennedy’s analysis, losing earned credit time would not be an “atypical and significant hardship[ ] ... in relation to the ordinary incidents of prison life.” McKune, 536 U.S. at 38 , 122 S.Ct. 2017 . 2014Under Justice Kennedy’s analysis, losing earned credit time would not be an “atypical and significant hardship[ ] ... in relation to the ordinary incidents of prison life.” McKune, 536 U.S. at 38 , 122 S.Ct. 2017 . | 2 | 2014–2014 |
Myers v. Deets
green
1 sentence2014This court affirmed summary judgment in favor of Kennedy in Myers v. Kennedy, 968 N.E.2d 299 (Ind. Ct. App. 2012), but it reversed the dismissal in favor of Great American, finding that the motion to dismiss was more appropriately addressed as a motion for summary judgment. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.