professional standard in Minnesota

2016“When a claim is predicated on conduct subject to a professional standard of care, expert evidence is generally required to support the claim.” Blatz v. Allina Health Sys., 622 N.W.2d 376, 388 (Minn. App. 2001), review denied (Minn. May 16, 2001).

2016“When a claim is predicated on conduct subject to a professional standard of care, expert evidence is generally required to support 6 the claim.” Blatz v. Allina Health Sys., 622 N.W.2d 376, 388 (Minn. App. 2001), review denied (Minn. May 16, 2001).

2001Hestbeck v. Hennepin County, 297 Minn. 419, 424 , 212 N.W.2d 361, 364 (1973).

2001Hestbeck v. Hennepin County, 297 Minn. 419, 424 , 212 N.W.2d 361, 364 (1973).

1997See Barna, Guzy & Steffen, Ltd. v. Beens, 541 N.W.2d 354, 356 (Minn.App.1995) (contract which violates law or public policy is void), review denied (Minn. Feb. 27, 1996). 1 Finally, it is inappropriate for this court to dilute the plain language of a professional rule established by the supreme court.

1997See Barna, Guzy & Steffen, Ltd. v. Beens, 541 N.W.2d 354, 356 (Minn.App.1995) (contract which violates law or public policy is void), review denied (Minn. Feb. 27, 1996). [1] Finally, it is inappropriate for this court to dilute the plain language of a professional rule established by the supreme court.

1986“The rule is that a physician’s professional standard of conduct and the necessities and proprieties thereof are to be tested by the evidence of those who are trained and skilled in his particular school of medicine.” Bush v. Cress, 181 Minn. 590, 595 , 233 N.W. 317, 319 (1930).

1986“The rule is that a physician’s professional standard of conduct and the necessities and proprieties thereof are to be tested by the evidence of those who are trained and skilled in his particular school of medicine.” Bush v. Cress, 181 Minn. 590, 595 , 233 N.W. 317, 319 (1930).