Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 North Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 1930–2013 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Bunchgreen2 sentences2013App. 594, 597 , 645 S.E.2d 402, 405 (holding that 56 days was a reasonable time for defense counsel - who had not represented defendant at trial - to prepare for resentencing after remand), appeal dismissed and disc. review denied, 361 N.C. 570 , 650 S.E.2d 817 (2007); State v. Bunch, 106 N.C. 2013App. 128, 132 , 415 S.E.2d 375, 377 (finding no constitutional violation where “counsel had approximately 55 days to prepare for trial” in which State called only two witnesses and defendant presented no evidence), disc. review denied, 332 N.C. 149 , 419 S.E.2d 575 (1992); State v. Martin, 64 N.C. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Bullockgreen1 sentence2013App. 594, 597 , 645 S.E.2d 402, 405 (holding that 56 days was a reasonable time for defense counsel - who had not represented defendant at trial - to prepare for resentencing after remand), appeal dismissed and disc. review denied, 361 N.C. 570 , 650 S.E.2d 817 (2007); State v. Bunch, 106 N.C. | 1 | 1 |
Yancey v. Watkinsgreen1 sentence1978Jur. 2d, Specific Performance, § 35, p. 56; see Yancey v. Watkins, 17 N.C. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Martin
green
1 sentence2013App. 128, 132 , 415 S.E.2d 375, 377 (finding no constitutional violation where “counsel had approximately 55 days to prepare for trial” in which State called only two witnesses and defendant presented no evidence), disc. review denied, 332 N.C. 149 , 419 S.E.2d 575 (1992); State v. Martin, 64 N.C. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
In re Snoddy
neutral
1 sentence2013App. 128, 132 , 415 S.E.2d 375, 377 (finding no constitutional violation where “counsel had approximately 55 days to prepare for trial” in which State called only two witnesses and defendant presented no evidence), disc. review denied, 332 N.C. 149 , 419 S.E.2d 575 (1992); State v. Martin, 64 N.C. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Perkins v. CCH Computax, Inc.
green
1 sentence2013App. 128, 132 , 415 S.E.2d 375, 377 (finding no constitutional violation where “counsel had approximately 55 days to prepare for trial” in which State called only two witnesses and defendant presented no evidence), disc. review denied, 332 N.C. 149 , 419 S.E.2d 575 (1992); State v. Martin, 64 N.C. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
State v. Borges
green
1 sentence2013App. 594, 597 , 645 S.E.2d 402, 405 (holding that 56 days was a reasonable time for defense counsel - who had not represented defendant at trial - to prepare for resentencing after remand), appeal dismissed and disc. review denied, 361 N.C. 570 , 650 S.E.2d 817 (2007); State v. Bunch, 106 N.C. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
State v. Burchfield
green
1 sentence2013App. 594, 597 , 645 S.E.2d 402, 405 (holding that 56 days was a reasonable time for defense counsel - who had not represented defendant at trial - to prepare for resentencing after remand), appeal dismissed and disc. review denied, 361 N.C. 570 , 650 S.E.2d 817 (2007); State v. Bunch, 106 N.C. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Fletcher v. Jones
green
1 sentence2009The Court agreed with the Court of Appeals that as a result of this waiver, the reasonable time doctrine applied, but disagreed with the Court of Appeals’ conclusion “that the reasonable time for performance was to be computed from [the 10 March 1981 closing date].” Id. at 394, 333 S.E.2d at 735 . | 1 | 2009–2009 |
State v. Moore
green
1 sentence2007Defendant further argues that defense counsel’s complete lack of preparation or even basic understanding about the case required the court to grant the motion based on the principle that “[a] continuance ought to be granted if there is an apparent probability that it will further the ends of justice.” Moore, 39 N.C. | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Peele v. Wilson County Board of Education
green
2 sentences1990Coxe , at 134, 349 S.E.2d at 77 ; Peele v. Wilson County Board of Education, 56 N.C. 1990Coxe , at 134, 349 S.E.2d at 77 ; Peele v. Wilson County Board of Education, 56 N.C.App. 555, 560 , 289 S.E.2d 890, 893 , rev. denied, 306 N.C. 386 , 294 S.E.2d 210 (1982). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Peele v. Board of Education
green
1 sentence1990Coxe , at 134, 349 S.E.2d at 77 ; Peele v. Wilson County Board of Education, 56 N.C.App. 555, 560 , 289 S.E.2d 890, 893 , rev. denied, 306 N.C. 386 , 294 S.E.2d 210 (1982). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Coxe v. Wyatt
green
2 sentences1990Coxe , at 134, 349 S.E.2d at 77 ; Peele v. Wilson County Board of Education, 56 N.C. 1990Coxe , at 134, 349 S.E.2d at 77 ; Peele v. Wilson County Board of Education, 56 N.C.App. 555, 560 , 289 S.E.2d 890, 893 , rev. denied, 306 N.C. 386 , 294 S.E.2d 210 (1982). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Peele v. WILSON COUNTY BD. OF EDUCATION
green
1 sentence1990Coxe , at 134, 349 S.E.2d at 77 ; Peele v. Wilson County Board of Education, 56 N.C.App. 555, 560 , 289 S.E.2d 890, 893 , rev. denied, 306 N.C. 386 , 294 S.E.2d 210 (1982). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Peele v. WILSON COUNTY BD. OF EDUC.
green
1 sentence1990Coxe , at 134, 349 S.E.2d at 77 ; Peele v. Wilson County Board of Education, 56 N.C.App. 555, 560 , 289 S.E.2d 890, 893 , rev. denied, 306 N.C. 386 , 294 S.E.2d 210 (1982). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Winders v. Hill.
green
2 sentences1930Michael v. Foil , 100 N.C. 178 , 191 ; Winders v. Hill , 141 N.C. 694 , 704 . 1930Michael v. Foil, 100 N. C., 178, 191 ; Winders v. Hill, 141 N. C., 694, 704 . | 1 | 1930–1930 |
Michael v. . Foil
green
2 sentences1930Michael v. Foil , 100 N.C. 178 , 191 ; Winders v. Hill , 141 N.C. 694 , 704 . 1930Michael v. Foil, 100 N. C., 178, 191 ; Winders v. Hill, 141 N. C., 694, 704 . | 1 | 1930–1930 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.