Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Washington opinions name it 1 courts 1999–2022 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Griggs v. Averbeck Realty, Inc.green1 sentence1999See Scott, 92 Wn.2d at 212 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Luckett v. Boeing Co.
green
2 sentences2022When determining whether the moving party met the reasonable time requirement, the trial court first measures the “critical period.” Id. 2022The critical period is “the period between when the moving party became aware of the judgment and the filing of the motion.” Id. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
State v. Costich
green
1 sentence2021State v. Costich, 152 Wn.2d 463, 477 , 98 P.3d 795 (2004). | 1 | 2021–2021 |
State v. Costich
green
1 sentence2021State v. Costich, 152 Wn.2d 463, 477 , 98 P.3d 795 (2004). | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Pettet v. Wonders
green
2 sentences2020Rains appears to argue that Pettet v. Wonders stands for the proposition that the reasonable time bar does not apply if there is perjury in a case. 23 Wn. 2020App. 795, 800 , 599 P.2d 1297 (1979). | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Dalton v. State
green
1 sentence2018App. 653,656 , 124 P.3d 305 (2005); see RespTs Br. at 12(arguing service of process was proper because "Mr. Sheehan's 2017 declaration recanting his 2010 sworn affidavit of service lacked credibility."). 5 No. 77139-6-1/6 The reasonable time requirement of CR 60 does not apply to a CR 60(b)(5) motion to vacate a void judgment. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
In Re Marriage of Obaidi and Qayoum
green
1 sentence2018App. 609, 617 , 226 P.3d 787 (2010). 8 John also argues that Tatyana’s CR 60(b) motion was not filed within a reasonable time as that rule requires. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
In re the Marriage of Mu Chai
green
1 sentence2018We can affirm a trial court decision on an alternative theory if the record has been sufficiently developed to fairly consider the theory." An improperly served party can waive the affirmative defense of lack of personal jurisdiction by rule or as a matter of common law.14 Common law waiver 9 Chai v. Kong 122 Wn. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
In Re Marriage of Leslie
green
1 sentence2014In Leslie, the trial court entered a default judgment in favor of the respondent, awarding expenses that the respondent had not requested. 112 Wn.2d at 614 . | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.