Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Nevada opinions name it 2 courts 1985–2024 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Nevada courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Lioce v. Cohengreen2 sentences2024See Lime, 124 Nev. at 19, 174 P. 3d at 981 (providing that "the district court shall give great weight to the fact that single instances of improper conduct that could have been cured by objection and admonishment might not be curable when the improper conduct is repeated or persistent"). 2024See Lioce, 124 Nev. at 19 , 174 P. 3d at 981 (providing that "the district court shall give great weight to the fact that single instances of improper conduct that could have been cured by objection and admonish.ment might not be curable when the improper conduct is repeated or persistent"). | 2 | 2 |
Polk v. Stategreen2 sentences2020To temper the impact of this rule, this court would overlook the State's confession of error where the State "inadvertently failed to respond to an inconsequential issue or had a recognizable excuse." Polk, 126 Nev. at 185, 233 P.3d at 360. 2020To temper the impact of this rule, this court would overlook the State's confession of error where the State "inadvertently failed to respond to an inconsequential issue or had a recognizable excuse." Polk, 126 Nev. at 185, 233 P.3d at 360. | 1 | 1 |
Blake v. Stategreen2 sentences2019See Blake v. State, 121 Nev. 779, 798 , 121 P.3d 567, 579 (2005). 2019See Blake v. State, 121 Nev. 779, 798 , 121 P.3d 567, 579 (2005). | 1 | 1 |
Rippo v. Stategreen2 sentences2018See Bejarano v. State, 122 Nev. 1066, 1081 , 146 P.3d 265, 276 (2006) ("Reweighing requires us to answer the following question: Is it clear beyond a reasonable doubt that absent the invalid aggravators the jury still would have imposed a sentence of death?"); Rippo v. State, 122 Nev. 1086, 1093-94 , 146 P.3d 279, 284 (2006) (striking SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 18 (0) 194M, three aggravating circumstances under McConnell and reweighing, looking only to the trial record for mitigating evidence); Haberstroh v. State, 119 Nev. 173 , 184 n.23, 69 P.3d 676 , 683 n.23 (2003) (reweighing does not involv 2018See Bejarano v. State, 122 Nev. 1066, 1081 , 146 P.3d 265, 276 (2006) ("Reweighing requires us to answer the following question: Is it clear beyond a reasonable doubt that absent the invalid aggravators the jury still would have imposed a sentence of death?"); Rippo v. State, 122 Nev. 1086, 1093-94 , 146 P.3d 279, 284 (2006) (striking SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 18 (0) 194M, three aggravating circumstances under McConnell and reweighing, looking only to the trial record for mitigating evidence); Haberstroh v. State, 119 Nev. 173 , 184 n.23, 69 P.3d 676 , 683 n.23 (2003) (reweighing does not involv | 1 | 1 |
Bejarano v. Stategreen2 sentences2018See Bejarano v. State, 122 Nev. 1066, 1081 , 146 P.3d 265, 276 (2006) ("Reweighing requires us to answer the following question: Is it clear beyond a reasonable doubt that absent the invalid aggravators the jury still would have imposed a sentence of death?"); Rippo v. State, 122 Nev. 1086, 1093-94 , 146 P.3d 279, 284 (2006) (striking SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 18 (0) 194M, three aggravating circumstances under McConnell and reweighing, looking only to the trial record for mitigating evidence); Haberstroh v. State, 119 Nev. 173 , 184 n.23, 69 P.3d 676 , 683 n.23 (2003) (reweighing does not involv 2018See Bejarano v. State, 122 Nev. 1066, 1081 , 146 P.3d 265, 276 (2006) ("Reweighing requires us to answer the following question: Is it clear beyond a reasonable doubt that absent the invalid aggravators the jury still would have imposed a sentence of death?"); Rippo v. State, 122 Nev. 1086, 1093-94 , 146 P.3d 279, 284 (2006) (striking SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 18 (0) 194M, three aggravating circumstances under McConnell and reweighing, looking only to the trial record for mitigating evidence); Haberstroh v. State, 119 Nev. 173 , 184 n.23, 69 P.3d 676 , 683 n.23 (2003) (reweighing does not involv | 1 | 1 |
Bridges v. Stategreen1 sentence2018See Bejarano v. State, 122 Nev. 1066, 1081 , 146 P.3d 265, 276 (2006) ("Reweighing requires us to answer the following question: Is it clear beyond a reasonable doubt that absent the invalid aggravators the jury still would have imposed a sentence of death?"); Rippo v. State, 122 Nev. 1086, 1093-94 , 146 P.3d 279, 284 (2006) (striking SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 18 (0) 194M, three aggravating circumstances under McConnell and reweighing, looking only to the trial record for mitigating evidence); Haberstroh v. State, 119 Nev. 173 , 184 n.23, 69 P.3d 676 , 683 n.23 (2003) (reweighing does not involv | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nevada. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Haberstroh
green
2 sentences2018See Bejarano v. State, 122 Nev. 1066, 1081 , 146 P.3d 265, 276 (2006) ("Reweighing requires us to answer the following question: Is it clear beyond a reasonable doubt that absent the invalid aggravators the jury still would have imposed a sentence of death?"); Rippo v. State, 122 Nev. 1086, 1093-94 , 146 P.3d 279, 284 (2006) (striking SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 18 (0) 194M, three aggravating circumstances under McConnell and reweighing, looking only to the trial record for mitigating evidence); Haberstroh v. State, 119 Nev. 173 , 184 n.23, 69 P.3d 676 , 683 n.23 (2003) (reweighing does not involv 2018See Bejarano v. State, 122 Nev. 1066, 1081 , 146 P.3d 265, 276 (2006) ("Reweighing requires us to answer the following question: Is it clear beyond a reasonable doubt that absent the invalid aggravators the jury still would have imposed a sentence of death?"); Rippo v. State, 122 Nev. 1086, 1093-94 , 146 P.3d 279, 284 (2006) (striking SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 18 (0) 194M, three aggravating circumstances under McConnell and reweighing, looking only to the trial record for mitigating evidence); Haberstroh v. State, 119 Nev. 173 , 184 n.23, 69 P.3d 676 , 683 n.23 (2003) (reweighing does not involv | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Dziokonski v. Babineau
green
1 sentence1985Rickey v. Chicago Transit Auth., 457 N.E.2d 1 (Ill. 1983); Dziokonski v. Babineau, 380 N.E.2d 1295 (Mass. 1978); Corso v. Merrill, 406 A.2d 300 (N.H. 1979); Whetham v. Bismark Hospital, 197 N.W.2d 678 (N.D. 1972); Schultz v. Barberton Glass Co., 447 N.E.2d 109 (Ohio 1983); Sinn v. Burd, 404 A.2d 672 (Pa. 1979); Garrett by Kravit v. City of New Berlin, 362 N.W.2d 137 (Wis. 1985). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Sinn v. Burd
green
1 sentence1985Rickey v. Chicago Transit Auth., 457 N.E.2d 1 (Ill. 1983); Dziokonski v. Babineau, 380 N.E.2d 1295 (Mass. 1978); Corso v. Merrill, 406 A.2d 300 (N.H. 1979); Whetham v. Bismark Hospital, 197 N.W.2d 678 (N.D. 1972); Schultz v. Barberton Glass Co., 447 N.E.2d 109 (Ohio 1983); Sinn v. Burd, 404 A.2d 672 (Pa. 1979); Garrett by Kravit v. City of New Berlin, 362 N.W.2d 137 (Wis. 1985). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Corso v. Merrill
green
1 sentence1985Rickey v. Chicago Transit Auth., 457 N.E.2d 1 (Ill. 1983); Dziokonski v. Babineau, 380 N.E.2d 1295 (Mass. 1978); Corso v. Merrill, 406 A.2d 300 (N.H. 1979); Whetham v. Bismark Hospital, 197 N.W.2d 678 (N.D. 1972); Schultz v. Barberton Glass Co., 447 N.E.2d 109 (Ohio 1983); Sinn v. Burd, 404 A.2d 672 (Pa. 1979); Garrett by Kravit v. City of New Berlin, 362 N.W.2d 137 (Wis. 1985). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Whetham v. Bismarck Hospital
green
1 sentence1985Rickey v. Chicago Transit Auth., 457 N.E.2d 1 (Ill. 1983); Dziokonski v. Babineau, 380 N.E.2d 1295 (Mass. 1978); Corso v. Merrill, 406 A.2d 300 (N.H. 1979); Whetham v. Bismark Hospital, 197 N.W.2d 678 (N.D. 1972); Schultz v. Barberton Glass Co., 447 N.E.2d 109 (Ohio 1983); Sinn v. Burd, 404 A.2d 672 (Pa. 1979); Garrett by Kravit v. City of New Berlin, 362 N.W.2d 137 (Wis. 1985). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Schultz v. Barberton Glass Co.
green
1 sentence1985Rickey v. Chicago Transit Auth., 457 N.E.2d 1 (Ill. 1983); Dziokonski v. Babineau, 380 N.E.2d 1295 (Mass. 1978); Corso v. Merrill, 406 A.2d 300 (N.H. 1979); Whetham v. Bismark Hospital, 197 N.W.2d 678 (N.D. 1972); Schultz v. Barberton Glass Co., 447 N.E.2d 109 (Ohio 1983); Sinn v. Burd, 404 A.2d 672 (Pa. 1979); Garrett by Kravit v. City of New Berlin, 362 N.W.2d 137 (Wis. 1985). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Garrett Ex Rel. Kravit v. City of New Berlin
green
1 sentence1985Rickey v. Chicago Transit Auth., 457 N.E.2d 1 (Ill. 1983); Dziokonski v. Babineau, 380 N.E.2d 1295 (Mass. 1978); Corso v. Merrill, 406 A.2d 300 (N.H. 1979); Whetham v. Bismark Hospital, 197 N.W.2d 678 (N.D. 1972); Schultz v. Barberton Glass Co., 447 N.E.2d 109 (Ohio 1983); Sinn v. Burd, 404 A.2d 672 (Pa. 1979); Garrett by Kravit v. City of New Berlin, 362 N.W.2d 137 (Wis. 1985). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Rickey v. Chicago Transit Authority
green
1 sentence1985Rickey v. Chicago Transit Auth., 457 N.E.2d 1 (Ill. 1983); Dziokonski v. Babineau, 380 N.E.2d 1295 (Mass. 1978); Corso v. Merrill, 406 A.2d 300 (N.H. 1979); Whetham v. Bismark Hospital, 197 N.W.2d 678 (N.D. 1972); Schultz v. Barberton Glass Co., 447 N.E.2d 109 (Ohio 1983); Sinn v. Burd, 404 A.2d 672 (Pa. 1979); Garrett by Kravit v. City of New Berlin, 362 N.W.2d 137 (Wis. 1985). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.