impact exception in Connecticut

1991It is now clearly established that parents have a constitutionally protected interest located "within the zone of privacy created by several fundamental constitutional guarantees;" Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 , 485 , 85 S.Ct. 1678 , 14 L.Ed.2d 510 (1965); Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 , 153 , 93 S.Ct. 1409 , 35 L.Ed.2d 694 (1973); to employ contraceptive techniques to limit the size of their family.

1991It is now clearly established that parents have a constitutionally protected interest located "within the zone of privacy created by several fundamental constitutional guarantees;" Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 , 485 , 85 S.Ct. 1678 , 14 L.Ed.2d 510 (1965); Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 , 153 , 93 S.Ct. 1409 , 35 L.Ed.2d 694 (1973); to employ contraceptive techniques to limit the size of their family.

2015Instead, beginning with the seminal California case of Dillon v. Legg, 68 Cal. 2d 728 , 441 P.2d 912 , 69 Cal. Rptr. 72 (1968), nearly three fourths of the states have adopted some form of what has come to be known as the rule of reasonable foreseeability.

2015Instead, beginning with the seminal California case of Dillon v. Legg, 68 Cal. 2d 728 , 441 P.2d 912 , 69 Cal. Rptr. 72 (1968), nearly three fourths of the states have adopted some form of what has come to be known as the rule of reasonable foreseeability.

2013We look to our Supreme Court’s opinion in D’Ascanio v. D’Ascanio, supra, 237 Conn. 481 , for guidance on the issue of whether the agreement’s self-executing provision terminating alimony in the event of cohabitation should have been enforced by the court after it found that the plaintiff had cohabited as defined in § 46b-86 (b).

2007In Burns v. Hanson, 249 Conn. 809 , 734 A.2d 964 (1999), the plaintiff, the mother of one child, had multiple sclerosis (MS) and was advised that any future pregnancy could be detrimental to her.

2007In Burns v. Hanson, 249 Conn. 809 , 734 A.2d 964 (1999), the plaintiff, the mother of one child, had multiple sclerosis (MS) and was advised that any future pregnancy could be detrimental to her.

2007But public policy cannot support an exception to tort liability when the impact of such an exception would impair the exercise of a constitutionally protected right.” (Citations omitted.) Id., 258 .

2006See, e.g., State v. Munoz, 233 Conn. 106 , 128 n.12, 659 A.2d 683 (1995) (rejecting defendant’s challenges to probable cause hearing and therefore declining to reconsider holdings that flawed probable cause hearing deprives court of personal jurisdiction over defendant); State v. Greenfield, 228 Conn. 62 , 74 n.13, 634 A.2d 879 (1993) (declining to reconsider and overrule State v. Mitchell, supra, 200 Conn. 323 , because trial court properly found probable cause).

2006See, e.g., State v. Munoz, 233 Conn. 106 , 128 n.12, 659 A.2d 683 (1995) (rejecting defendant’s challenges to probable cause hearing and therefore declining to reconsider holdings that flawed probable cause hearing deprives court of personal jurisdiction over defendant); State v. Greenfield, 228 Conn. 62 , 74 n.13, 634 A.2d 879 (1993) (declining to reconsider and overrule State v. Mitchell, supra, 200 Conn. 323 , because trial court properly found probable cause).

2006See, e.g., State v. Munoz, 233 Conn. 106 , 128 n.12, 659 A.2d 683 (1995) (rejecting defendant’s challenges to probable cause hearing and therefore declining to reconsider holdings that flawed probable cause hearing deprives court of personal jurisdiction over defendant); State v. Greenfield, 228 Conn. 62 , 74 n.13, 634 A.2d 879 (1993) (declining to reconsider and overrule State v. Mitchell, supra, 200 Conn. 323 , because trial court properly found probable cause).

2004It is well settled that a criminal defendant is constitutionally entitled “to a jury determination that [he] is guilty of every element of the crime with which he is charged, beyond a reasonable doubt.” Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 477 , 120 S. Ct. 2348 , 147 L.

2004It is well settled that a criminal defendant is constitutionally entitled “to a jury determination that [he] is guilty of every element of the crime with which he is charged, beyond a reasonable doubt.” Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 477 , 120 S. Ct. 2348 , 147 L.

2001“An appeal to emotions, passions, or prejudices improperly diverts the jury’s attention away from the facts and makes it more difficult for it to decide the case on the evidence in the record.” State v. Alexander, 254 Conn. 290, 307 , 755 A.2d 868 (2000).

2001“An appeal to emotions, passions, or prejudices improperly diverts the jury’s attention away from the facts and makes it more difficult for it to decide the case on the evidence in the record.” State v. Alexander, 254 Conn. 290, 307 , 755 A.2d 868 (2000).

2000We turn, therefore, to the second prong of the test, namely, whether there was an underrepresentation of Hispanic persons in the jury array. 1 Courts traditionally have employed one of four statistical models in order to analyze the question of whether a particular group is underrepresented in a jury pool: (1) absolute disparity; 12 (2) comparative disparity; 13 (3) statistical decision theory; 14 or (4) sub stantial impact. 15 In State v. Castonguay, supra, 194 Conn. 426 , this court stated that “the choice of a statistical method depends on the facts and circumstances of each case.” This cou

2000We turn, therefore, to the second prong of the test, namely, whether there was an underrepresentation of Hispanic persons in the jury array. 1 Courts traditionally have employed one of four statistical models in order to analyze the question of whether a particular group is underrepresented in a jury pool: (1) absolute disparity; 12 (2) comparative disparity; 13 (3) statistical decision theory; 14 or (4) sub stantial impact. 15 In State v. Castonguay, supra, 194 Conn. 426 , this court stated that “the choice of a statistical method depends on the facts and circumstances of each case.” This cou

2000That discretion includes . . . the degree of complexity of the factual and legal issues, the likely time requirements for trial, the need for discovery and the degree of discovery which is reasonably required, whether complex defenses will be raised in good faith, the impact of hearing the case on the rest of the summary process docket, and whether other actions for similar relief are pending elsewhere." Id.

1992Thus, “[w]hen faced with a situation such as is presented here, a court should analyze the implications of the violation for the defendant’s prison rehabilitation program as well as the subsidiary concern of the impact of the violation on the defendant’s speedy trial rights.” People v. Higinbotham, supra, 998 .

1991It is now clearly established that parents have a constitutionally protected interest located "within the zone of privacy created by several fundamental constitutional guarantees;" Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 , 485 , 85 S.Ct. 1678 , 14 L.Ed.2d 510 (1965); Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 , 153 , 93 S.Ct. 1409 , 35 L.Ed.2d 694 (1973); to employ contraceptive techniques to limit the size of their family.

1991It is now clearly established that parents have a constitutionally protected interest located "within the zone of privacy created by several fundamental constitutional guarantees;" Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 , 485 , 85 S.Ct. 1678 , 14 L.Ed.2d 510 (1965); Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 , 153 , 93 S.Ct. 1409 , 35 L.Ed.2d 694 (1973); to employ contraceptive techniques to limit the size of their family.

1986State v. Bruno, 197 Conn. 326, 336 , 497 A.2d 758 , cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1119 , 106 S. Ct. 1635 , 90 L.

1986State v. Bruno, 197 Conn. 326, 336 , 497 A.2d 758 , cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1119 , 106 S. Ct. 1635 , 90 L.

1986State v. Bruno, 197 Conn. 326, 336 , 497 A.2d 758 , cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1119 , 106 S. Ct. 1635 , 90 L.

1986State v. Bruno, 197 Conn. 326, 336 , 497 A.2d 758 , cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1119 , 106 S. Ct. 1635 , 90 L.

1986State v. Bruno, 197 Conn. 326, 336 , 497 A.2d 758 , cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1119 , 106 S. Ct. 1635 , 90 L.