Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Oklahoma opinions name it 2 courts 1980–2022 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oklahoma courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
IN RE INITIATIVE PETITION NO. 403 STATE QUESTION NO. 779green2 sentences2018In re Initiative Petition No. 403 , 2016 OK 1 at ¶ 5, 367 P.3d 472 ; In re Initiative Petition No. 363, State Question No. 672 , 1996 OK 122 , ¶ 15, 927 P.2d 558 . 7 In *357 In re In re Initiative Petition No. 363 , the Court described the test in the following manner: [W]hen the proposed constitutional amendment is by a new article the test for gauging multiplicity of subjects is whether the changes proposed are all germane to a singular common subject and purpose or are essentially unrelated one to another. 2018In re Initiative Petition No. 403 , 2016 OK 1 at ¶ 5, 367 P.3d 472 ; In re Initiative Petition No. 363, State Question No. 672 , 1996 OK 122 , ¶ 15, 927 P.2d 558 . 7 In *357 In re In re Initiative Petition No. 363 , the Court described the test in the following manner: [W]hen the proposed constitutional amendment is by a new article the test for gauging multiplicity of subjects is whether the changes proposed are all germane to a singular common subject and purpose or are essentially unrelated one to another. | 2 | 2 |
In Re Initiative Petition No. 363, State Question No. 672green2 sentences2018In re Initiative Petition No. 403 , 2016 OK 1 at ¶ 5, 367 P.3d 472 ; In re Initiative Petition No. 363, State Question No. 672 , 1996 OK 122 , ¶ 15, 927 P.2d 558 . 7 In *357 In re In re Initiative Petition No. 363 , the Court described the test in the following manner: [W]hen the proposed constitutional amendment is by a new article the test for gauging multiplicity of subjects is whether the changes proposed are all germane to a singular common subject and purpose or are essentially unrelated one to another. 2018In re Initiative Petition No. 403 , 2016 OK 1 at ¶ 5, 367 P.3d 472 ; In re Initiative Petition No. 363, State Question No. 672 , 1996 OK 122 , ¶ 15, 927 P.2d 558 . 7 In *357 In re In re Initiative Petition No. 363 , the Court described the test in the following manner: [W]hen the proposed constitutional amendment is by a new article the test for gauging multiplicity of subjects is whether the changes proposed are all germane to a singular common subject and purpose or are essentially unrelated one to another. | 1 | 2 |
City of Edmond v. Vernongreen2 sentences2021Where a statute operates upon a class, the classification must be reasonable and pertain to some peculiarity in the subject of the legislation and there must be some distinctive characteristic upon which different treatment is reasonably founded . (citations omitted) (emphasis added); see also City of Edmond v. Vernon , 2009 OK CIV APP 36, ¶ 2 , 210 P.3d 860, 864 (where the Court denied an art. 5, § 46 challenge to the constitutionality of a workers' compensation provision that established a presumption that a firefighter disabled as a result of heart disease "shall be presumed to have incurre 2021Where a statute operates upon a class, the classification must be reasonable and pertain to some peculiarity in the subject of the legislation and there must be some distinctive characteristic upon which different treatment is reasonably founded . (citations omitted) (emphasis added); see also City of Edmond v. Vernon , 2009 OK CIV APP 36, ¶ 2 , 210 P.3d 860, 864 (where the Court denied an art. 5, § 46 challenge to the constitutionality of a workers' compensation provision that established a presumption that a firefighter disabled as a result of heart disease "shall be presumed to have incurre | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oklahoma. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Glasco v. State ex rel. Oklahoma Department of Corrections
green
2 sentences2022Oklahoma Department of Corrections , 2008 OK 65, ¶ 21 , 188 P.3d 177, 184 , the Court described the required analysis for purposes of Okla. 2022Oklahoma Department of Corrections , 2008 OK 65, ¶ 21 , 188 P.3d 177, 184 , the Court described the required analysis for purposes of Okla. | 2 | 2021–2022 |
Midland Valley Railroad v. Barnes
green
2 sentences2008Co. v. Barnes, 1933 OK 26, ¶ 5 , 18 P.2d 1089 , the Court, quoting a Tennessee case, discussed whether a jury is to be satisfied whether evidence does or does not preponderate and examined the words "satisfy” and "satisfactory evidence.” In Board of Com'rs of Garfield County v. Anderson, 1934 OK 6, ¶ 46 , 29 P.2d 75 , the Court described a requirement that intent be satisfactorily shown as that which is clear and unequivocal. 2008Co. v. Barnes, 1933 OK 26, ¶ 5 , 18 P.2d 1089 , the Court, quoting a Tennessee case, discussed whether a jury is to be satisfied whether evidence does or does not preponderate and examined the words "satisfy” and "satisfactory evidence.” In Board of Com'rs of Garfield County v. Anderson, 1934 OK 6, ¶ 46 , 29 P.2d 75 , the Court described a requirement that intent be satisfactorily shown as that which is clear and unequivocal. | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Board of Com'rs of Garfield County v. Anderson
neutral
2 sentences2008Co. v. Barnes, 1933 OK 26, ¶ 5 , 18 P.2d 1089 , the Court, quoting a Tennessee case, discussed whether a jury is to be satisfied whether evidence does or does not preponderate and examined the words "satisfy” and "satisfactory evidence.” In Board of Com'rs of Garfield County v. Anderson, 1934 OK 6, ¶ 46 , 29 P.2d 75 , the Court described a requirement that intent be satisfactorily shown as that which is clear and unequivocal. 2008Co. v. Barnes, 1933 OK 26, ¶ 5 , 18 P.2d 1089 , the Court, quoting a Tennessee case, discussed whether a jury is to be satisfied whether evidence does or does not preponderate and examined the words "satisfy” and "satisfactory evidence.” In Board of Com'rs of Garfield County v. Anderson, 1934 OK 6, ¶ 46 , 29 P.2d 75 , the Court described a requirement that intent be satisfactorily shown as that which is clear and unequivocal. | 1 | 2008–2008 |
State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Haworth
green
2 sentences1980Oklahoma Bar Association v. Haworth, supra, in a Bar disciplinary proceeding, the Court will weigh the evidence but “will not reverse the trial authority’s findings of fact unless” they are “against the clear weight of the evidence.” We find the trial authority’s findings of fact are amply substantiated by relator’s evidence and by respondent’s own admissions in the described hearing. 1980Oklahoma Bar Association v. Haworth, supra, in a Bar disciplinary proceeding, the Court will weigh the evidence but "will not reverse the trial authority's findings of fact unless" they are "against the clear weight of the evidence." We find the trial authority's findings of fact are amply substantiated by relator's evidence and by respondent's own admissions in the described hearing. | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.