two-tiered analysis in Idaho

46 Idaho opinions name it 2 courts 1975–2026 14 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (16)

Case	Followed	Cited
State v. Gristgreen idaho · 2009 · cited in 18 Idaho opinions naming this issue, 2012–2026 2 sentences 2026“Admissibility of evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts when offered for a permitted purpose is subject to a two-tiered analysis.” State v. Grist, 147 Idaho 49, 52 , 205 P.3d 1185, 1188 (2009). 2026“Admissibility of evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts when offered for a permitted purpose is subject to a two-tiered analysis.” State v. Grist, 147 Idaho 49, 52 , 205 P.3d 1185, 1188 (2009).	13	18
State v. Mooregreen idaho · 1991 · cited in 7 Idaho opinions naming this issue, 1993–2007 2 sentences 1998In determining whether evidence of a defendant’s uncharged misconduct should be admitted, the court must apply a two-tiered analysis. 594 See Moore, 120 Idaho at 745 , 819 P.2d at 1145 . 1998In determining whether evidence of a defendant’s uncharged misconduct should be admitted, the court must apply a two-tiered analysis. 594 See Moore, 120 Idaho at 745 , 819 P.2d at 1145 .	4	7
State v. Foxgreen idaho · 2022 · cited in 4 Idaho opinions naming this issue, 2023–2024 2 sentences 2024State v. Fox, 170 Idaho 846, 861 , 517 P.3d 107, 122 (2022). 2024State v. Fox, 170 Idaho 846, 861 , 517 P.3d 107, 122 (2022).	3	4
State v. Zimmermangreen idaho · 1992 · cited in 3 Idaho opinions naming this issue, 1997–1998 2 sentences 1998See Zimmerman, 121 Idaho at 977-78 , 829 P.2d at 867-68 . 1998See Zimmerman, 121 Idaho at 977-78 , 829 P.2d at 867-68 .	3	3
State v. Sheldongreen idaho · 2008 · cited in 3 Idaho opinions naming this issue, 2012–2014 2 sentences 2014State v. Sheldon, 145 Idaho 225, 229 , 178 P.3d 28, 32 (2008); State v. Atkinson, 124 Idaho 816, 819 , 864 P.2d 654, 657 (Ct.App.1993). 2014State v. Sheldon, 145 Idaho 225, 229 , 178 P.3d 28, 32 (2008); State v. Atkinson, 124 Idaho 816, 819 , 864 P.2d 654, 657 (Ct.App.1993).	2	3
State v. Roachgreen idahoctapp · 1985 · cited in 3 Idaho opinions naming this issue, 1988–1990 2 sentences 1988Thus, in State v. Roach, 109 Idaho 973 , 712 P.2d 674 (Ct.App.1985), we held that [t]he decision to admit evidence of other crimes involves a two-tiered analysis. 1988Thus, in State v. Roach, 109 Idaho 973 , 712 P.2d 674 (Ct.App.1985), we held that [t]he decision to admit evidence of other crimes involves a two-tiered analysis.	2	3
State v. Atkinsongreen idahoctapp · 1993 · cited in 2 Idaho opinions naming this issue, 2014–2014 2 sentences 2014State v. Sheldon, 145 Idaho 225, 229 , 178 P.3d 28, 32 (2008); State v. Atkinson, 124 Idaho 816, 819 , 864 P.2d 654, 657 (Ct.App.1993). 2014State v. Sheldon, 145 Idaho 225, 229 , 178 P.3d 28, 32 (2008); State v. Atkinson, 124 Idaho 816, 819 , 864 P.2d 654, 657 (Ct.App.1993).	2	2
State v. Crossgreen idaho · 1999 · cited in 2 Idaho opinions naming this issue, 2008–2012 2 sentences 2012Sheldon, 145 Idaho at 229 , 178 P.3d at 32 ; State v. Cross, 132 Idaho 667, 670 , 978 P.2d 227, 230 (1999). 2012Sheldon, 145 Idaho at 229 , 178 P.3d at 32 ; State v. Cross, 132 Idaho 667, 670 , 978 P.2d 227, 230 (1999).	2	2
State v. Arledgegreen idahoctapp · 1991 · cited in 2 Idaho opinions naming this issue, 1993–1996 2 sentences 1996I.R.E. 403; State v. Arledge, 119 Idaho 584, 588 , 808 P.2d 1329, 1333 (1991). 1996I.R.E. 403; State v. Arledge, 119 Idaho 584, 588 , 808 P.2d 1329, 1333 (1991).	2	2
State v. PEPCORNgreen idaho · 2012 · cited in 1 Idaho opinions naming this issue, 2012–2012 2 sentences 2012State v. Pepcorn, 152 Idaho 678, 688 , 273 P.3d 1271, 1281 (2012); State v. Grist, 147 Idaho 49, 52 , 205 P.3d 1185, 1188 (2009); State v. Avila, 137 Idaho 410, 412 , 49 P.3d 1260, 1262 (Ct.App.2002). 2012State v. Pepcorn, 152 Idaho 678, 688 , 273 P.3d 1271, 1281 (2012); State v. Grist, 147 Idaho 49, 52 , 205 P.3d 1185, 1188 (2009); State v. Avila, 137 Idaho 410, 412 , 49 P.3d 1260, 1262 (Ct.App.2002).	1	1
State v. Avilagreen idahoctapp · 2002 · cited in 1 Idaho opinions naming this issue, 2012–2012 2 sentences 2012State v. Pepcorn, 152 Idaho 678, 688 , 273 P.3d 1271, 1281 (2012); State v. Grist, 147 Idaho 49, 52 , 205 P.3d 1185, 1188 (2009); State v. Avila, 137 Idaho 410, 412 , 49 P.3d 1260, 1262 (Ct.App.2002). 2012State v. Pepcorn, 152 Idaho 678, 688 , 273 P.3d 1271, 1281 (2012); State v. Grist, 147 Idaho 49, 52 , 205 P.3d 1185, 1188 (2009); State v. Avila, 137 Idaho 410, 412 , 49 P.3d 1260, 1262 (Ct.App.2002).	1	1
State v. Whipplegreen idahoctapp · 2000 · cited in 1 Idaho opinions naming this issue, 2002–2002 2 sentences 2002State v. Whipple, 134 Idaho 498, 504 , 5 P.3d 478, 484 (Ct.App.2000). 2002State v. Whipple, 134 Idaho 498, 504 , 5 P.3d 478, 484 (Ct.App.2000).	1	1
State v. Sporgreen idahoctapp · 2000 · cited in 1 Idaho opinions naming this issue, 2001–2001 2 sentences 2001State v. Moore, 120 Idaho 743, 745 , 819 P.2d 1143, 1145 (1991); State v. Spor, 134 Idaho 315, 318 , 1 P.3d 816, 819 (Ct.App.2000). 2001State v. Moore, 120 Idaho 743, 745 , 819 P.2d 1143, 1145 (1991); State v. Spor, 134 Idaho 315, 318 , 1 P.3d 816, 819 (Ct.App.2000).	1	1
State v. Tapiagreen idaho · 1995 · cited in 1 Idaho opinions naming this issue, 2000–2000 2 sentences 2000State v. Tapia, 127 Idaho 249, 254 , 899 P.2d 959, 964 (1995); State v. Canelo, 129 Idaho 386, 393 , 924 P.2d 1230, 1237 (Ct.App.1996). 2000State v. Tapia, 127 Idaho 249, 254 , 899 P.2d 959, 964 (1995); State v. Canelo, 129 Idaho 386, 393 , 924 P.2d 1230, 1237 (Ct.App.1996).	1	1
State v. Canelogreen idahoctapp · 1996 · cited in 1 Idaho opinions naming this issue, 2000–2000 2 sentences 2000State v. Tapia, 127 Idaho 249, 254 , 899 P.2d 959, 964 (1995); State v. Canelo, 129 Idaho 386, 393 , 924 P.2d 1230, 1237 (Ct.App.1996). 2000State v. Tapia, 127 Idaho 249, 254 , 899 P.2d 959, 964 (1995); State v. Canelo, 129 Idaho 386, 393 , 924 P.2d 1230, 1237 (Ct.App.1996).	1	1
State v. Nicholsgreen idahoctapp · 1993 · cited in 1 Idaho opinions naming this issue, 1997–1997 2 sentences 1997Although it may appear that this Court previously examined the admissibility of evidence of prior misconduct under the abuse of discretion standard, in fact, this Court engages in the two-tiered analysis set forth in cases such as Moore, 120 Idaho at 745 , 819 P.2d at 1145 and State v. Nichols, 124 Idaho 651, 654, 862 P.2d 343, 346 (Ct.App.1993). 2 . 1997Although it may appear that this Court previously examined the admissibility of evidence of prior misconduct under the abuse of discretion standard, in fact, this Court engages in the two-tiered analysis set forth in cases such as Moore, 120 Idaho at 745 , 819 P.2d at 1145 and State v. Nichols, 124 Idaho 651, 654, 862 P.2d 343, 346 (Ct.App.1993). 2 .	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

Case	Cited	Years
State v. Matthews green idahoctapp · 1985 2 sentences 1990State v. Matthews, 108 Idaho 482 , 700 P.2d 104 (Ct.App.1985). 1990State v. Matthews, 108 Idaho 482 , 700 P.2d 104 (Ct.App.1985).	2	1985–1990
State v. Leavitt green idaho · 2023 1 sentence 2025Leavitt, 171 Idaho at 764, 525 P.3d at 1157 .	1	2025–2025
State v. Stuart green idaho · 1986 2 sentences 1997See I.R.E. 403; Stuart, 110 Idaho at 170 , 715 P.2d at 840 . 1997See I.R.E. 403; Stuart, 110 Idaho at 170 , 715 P.2d at 840 .	1	1997–1997
Thompson v. Hagan green idaho · 1974 2 sentences 1975The test was described by this Court in Thompson v. Hagan, 96 Idaho 19 , 523 P.2d 1365 (1974), as follows: “To determine whether a statutory classification scheme violates the equal protection guarantee, the United States Supreme Court has followed a two tier test. 1975The test was described by this Court in Thompson v. Hagan, 96 Idaho 19 , 523 P.2d 1365 (1974), as follows: “To determine whether a statutory classification scheme violates the equal protection guarantee, the United States Supreme Court has followed a two tier test.	1	1975–1975

Statutes the citing opinions construe

ID § Idaho Code § 18-1508 (7) ID § Idaho Code § 18-1506 (6) ID § Idaho Code § 18-6101 (6) ID § Idaho Code § 19-2514 (5) ID § Idaho Code § 19-2132 (4) ID § Idaho Code § 18-901 (3) ID § Idaho Code § 19-2406 (3) ID § Idaho Code § 19-4907 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

IN 887 (1985–2026) OH 115 (1990–2026) LA 51 (1989–2025) ID 46 (1975–2026) NY 36 (1976–2026) IL 33 (1981–2026) FL 16 (1982–2012) AL 13 (1984–2002) MN 12 (1986–2017) MI 11 (1978–2009) TX 10 (1986–2024) GA 10 (1993–2015) NC 9 (1983–2025) CA 9 (1975–2014) PA 8 (1973–2020) MT 8 (1990–2008) RI 8 (1990–2023) WI 7 (1992–2025) MD 5 (1981–2019) MS 5 (1993–2004) NJ 5 (1977–2022) CO 5 (1999–2019) UT 4 (1997–2007) OK 4 (1984–2009) AK 4 (1974–2021) WV 3 (1988–2021) CT 3 (1982–1996) OR 2 (1985–2013) HI 2 (2004–2010) NM 2 (1988–2006) MA 2 (1991–2018) AZ 2 (2015–2024) WA 2 (2004–2004)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check