Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 1993–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Fortson v. Weeksgreen2 sentences1993See Fortson v. Weeks, 232 Ga. 472, 488 ( 208 SE2d 68 ) (1974), Justice Hall's special concurrence. 1993See Fortson v. Weeks, 232 Ga. 472, 488 ( 208 SE2d 68 ) (1974), Justice Hall's special concurrence. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Doggett v. United States
green
2 sentences2015In its order denying Munna’s motion for new trial, the trial court did not specifically address the Sixth Amendment challenge, but found that “each error complained of by [Munna] to be without merit.” Every constitutional speedy trial claim is subject to a two-tiered analysis as set forth in the United States Supreme Court decisions Barker v. Wingo, 407 U. S. 514 ( 92 SCt 2182 , 33 LE2d 101) (1972) and Doggett v. United States, 505 U. S. 647 (II) ( 112 SCt 2686 , 120 LE2d 520) (1992). 2015In its order denying Munna’s motion for new trial, the trial court did not specifically address the Sixth Amendment challenge, but found that “each error complained of by [Munna] to be without merit.” Every constitutional speedy trial claim is subject to a two-tiered analysis as set forth in the United States Supreme Court decisions Barker v. Wingo, 407 U. S. 514 ( 92 SCt 2182 , 33 LE2d 101) (1972) and Doggett v. United States, 505 U. S. 647 (II) ( 112 SCt 2686 , 120 LE2d 520) (1992). | 9 | 2011–2015 |
Barker v. Wingo
green
2 sentences2015In its order denying Munna’s motion for new trial, the trial court did not specifically address the Sixth Amendment challenge, but found that “each error complained of by [Munna] to be without merit.” Every constitutional speedy trial claim is subject to a two-tiered analysis as set forth in the United States Supreme Court decisions Barker v. Wingo, 407 U. S. 514 ( 92 SCt 2182 , 33 LE2d 101) (1972) and Doggett v. United States, 505 U. S. 647 (II) ( 112 SCt 2686 , 120 LE2d 520) (1992). 2015In its order denying Munna’s motion for new trial, the trial court did not specifically address the Sixth Amendment challenge, but found that “each error complained of by [Munna] to be without merit.” Every constitutional speedy trial claim is subject to a two-tiered analysis as set forth in the United States Supreme Court decisions Barker v. Wingo, 407 U. S. 514 ( 92 SCt 2182 , 33 LE2d 101) (1972) and Doggett v. United States, 505 U. S. 647 (II) ( 112 SCt 2686 , 120 LE2d 520) (1992). | 9 | 2011–2015 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.