Daubert standard (Oregon) · Go Syfert
← Oregon issues

Daubert standard in Oregon

6 Oregon opinions name it 2 courts 1996–2025 3 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Oregon courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. O'Keygreen
or · 1995 · cited in 2 Oregon opinions naming this issue, 1996–2000
2 sentences

2000O’Key, 321 Or at 306 . *500 The Brown and pertinent Daubert factors overlap to some degree and boil down to a seven-step test, subject to the caveat that these factors are not an exclusive list of considerations to be applied mechanically.

1996In State v. O’Key, 321 Or 285, 306-07 , 899 P2d 663 (1995), this court considered Daubert’s analysis and holding, but continued to follow the Brown standard under the Oregon Evidence Code.

12
State v. Sampsongreen
orctapp · 2000 · cited in 1 Oregon opinions naming this issue, 2004–2004
1 sentence

2004Those factors vitiate the problem of the DRE protocol’s subjectivity, such as it is, and we conclude that the protocol satisfies this portion of the Brown / Daubert test.” Sampson, 167 Or App at 510 (emphasis added).

11
Taylor v. Stategreen
oklacrimapp · 1995 · cited in 1 Oregon opinions naming this issue, 1996–1996
1 sentence

1996See, e.g., Taylor v. State, 889 P2d 319 (Okl App 1995) (under Daubert standard); Fishback v. People, 851 P2d 884 (Colo 1993); State v. Cauthron, 120 Wash 2d 879, 846 P2d 502 (1993); State v. Montalbo, 73 Haw 130, 828 P2d 1274 (1992); Rivera v. State, 840 P2d 933 (Wyo 1992); Robinson v. State, 610 So 2d 1288 (Fla 1992); Polk v. State, 612 So 2d 381 (Miss 1992); People v. Axell, 235 Cal App 3d 836, 1 Cal Rptr 2d 411 (1991), rev den (1992); State v. Brown, 470 NW2d 30 (Iowa 1991); Spencer v. Commonwealth, 240 Va 78, 393 SE2d 609 , cert den 498 US 908 (1990); Caldwell v. State, 260 Ga 278, 393 SE2

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oregon. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (19)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Adams green
orctapp · 2025
2 sentences

2025The PCAST Report explained that, in light of the Daubert inquiry, “[i]t is the proper province of the scientific community to provide guidance concerning scientific standards for scientific valid- ity.” Ultimately, the report concluded that, “To establish foundational validity for a forensic fea- ture-comparison method, the following elements are required: “(a) a reproducible and consistent procedure for (i) identifying features in evidence samples; (ii) comparing the features in two samples; and (iii) determining, based on the similarity between the features in two sets of features, whether t

2025The PCAST Report explained that, in light of the Daubert inquiry, “[i]t is the proper province of the scientific community to provide guidance concerning scientific standards for scientific valid- ity.” Ultimately, the report concluded that, “To establish foundational validity for a forensic fea- ture-comparison method, the following elements are required: “(a) a reproducible and consistent procedure for (i) identifying features in evidence samples; (ii) comparing the features in two samples; and (iii) determining, based on the similarity between the features in two sets of features, whether t

22025–2025
State v. Ortiz green
or · 2024
2 sentences

2024Other scholars have reached similar conclusions: “Daubert clearly establishes that trial judges must eval- uate expert scientific testimony ‘at the outset,’ and that their analysis should focus on whether the testimony con- stitutes ‘scientific knowledge that... will assist the trier of fact to understand or determine a fact in issue.’ Justice Cite as 372 Or 658 (2024) 687 Blackmun’s opinion requires [courts] to undertake ‘a pre- liminary assessment of whether the reasoning or method- ology underlying the testimony is scientifically valid and of whether that reasoning or methodology properly c

2024Other scholars have reached similar conclusions: “Daubert clearly establishes that trial judges must eval- uate expert scientific testimony ‘at the outset,’ and that their analysis should focus on whether the testimony con- stitutes ‘scientific knowledge that... will assist the trier of fact to understand or determine a fact in issue.’ Justice Cite as 372 Or 658 (2024) 687 Blackmun’s opinion requires [courts] to undertake ‘a pre- liminary assessment of whether the reasoning or method- ology underlying the testimony is scientifically valid and of whether that reasoning or methodology properly c

12024–2024
United States v. Jakobetz green
vtd · 1990
1 sentence

1996See, e.g., Taylor v. State, 889 P2d 319 (Okl App 1995) (under Daubert standard); Fishback v. People, 851 P2d 884 (Colo 1993); State v. Cauthron, 120 Wash 2d 879, 846 P2d 502 (1993); State v. Montalbo, 73 Haw 130, 828 P2d 1274 (1992); Rivera v. State, 840 P2d 933 (Wyo 1992); Robinson v. State, 610 So 2d 1288 (Fla 1992); Polk v. State, 612 So 2d 381 (Miss 1992); People v. Axell, 235 Cal App 3d 836, 1 Cal Rptr 2d 411 (1991), rev den (1992); State v. Brown, 470 NW2d 30 (Iowa 1991); Spencer v. Commonwealth, 240 Va 78, 393 SE2d 609 , cert den 498 US 908 (1990); Caldwell v. State, 260 Ga 278, 393 SE2

11996–1996
Hamilton, as Natural Mother and Next Friend to Smith v. Texas green
scotus · 1990
1 sentence

1996See, e.g., Taylor v. State, 889 P2d 319 (Okl App 1995) (under Daubert standard); Fishback v. People, 851 P2d 884 (Colo 1993); State v. Cauthron, 120 Wash 2d 879, 846 P2d 502 (1993); State v. Montalbo, 73 Haw 130, 828 P2d 1274 (1992); Rivera v. State, 840 P2d 933 (Wyo 1992); Robinson v. State, 610 So 2d 1288 (Fla 1992); Polk v. State, 612 So 2d 381 (Miss 1992); People v. Axell, 235 Cal App 3d 836, 1 Cal Rptr 2d 411 (1991), rev den (1992); State v. Brown, 470 NW2d 30 (Iowa 1991); Spencer v. Commonwealth, 240 Va 78, 393 SE2d 609 , cert den 498 US 908 (1990); Caldwell v. State, 260 Ga 278, 393 SE2

11996–1996
State v. Futch green
orctapp · 1993
2 sentences

1996In State v. Herzog, 125 Or App 10 , 864 P2d 1362 (1993), aff'd 324 Or 294 , 924 P2d 817 (1996) and State v. Futch, 123 Or App 176 , 860 P2d 264 (1993), aff'd 324 Or 297 , 924 P2d 832 (1996) the Court of Appeals held that, in general, forensic DNA evidence was admissible.

1996In State v. Herzog, 125 Or App 10 , 864 P2d 1362 (1993), aff'd 324 Or 294 , 924 P2d 817 (1996) and State v. Futch, 123 Or App 176 , 860 P2d 264 (1993), aff'd 324 Or 297 , 924 P2d 832 (1996) the Court of Appeals held that, in general, forensic DNA evidence was admissible.

11996–1996
State v. Cauthron green
wash · 1993
1 sentence

1996See, e.g., Taylor v. State, 889 P2d 319 (Okl App 1995) (under Daubert standard); Fishback v. People, 851 P2d 884 (Colo 1993); State v. Cauthron, 120 Wash 2d 879, 846 P2d 502 (1993); State v. Montalbo, 73 Haw 130, 828 P2d 1274 (1992); Rivera v. State, 840 P2d 933 (Wyo 1992); Robinson v. State, 610 So 2d 1288 (Fla 1992); Polk v. State, 612 So 2d 381 (Miss 1992); People v. Axell, 235 Cal App 3d 836, 1 Cal Rptr 2d 411 (1991), rev den (1992); State v. Brown, 470 NW2d 30 (Iowa 1991); Spencer v. Commonwealth, 240 Va 78, 393 SE2d 609 , cert den 498 US 908 (1990); Caldwell v. State, 260 Ga 278, 393 SE2

11996–1996
People v. Wesley green
nycountyct · 1988
2 sentences

1996See, e.g., Taylor v. State, 889 P2d 319 (Okl App 1995) (under Daubert standard); Fishback v. People, 851 P2d 884 (Colo 1993); State v. Cauthron, 120 Wash 2d 879, 846 P2d 502 (1993); State v. Montalbo, 73 Haw 130, 828 P2d 1274 (1992); Rivera v. State, 840 P2d 933 (Wyo 1992); Robinson v. State, 610 So 2d 1288 (Fla 1992); Polk v. State, 612 So 2d 381 (Miss 1992); People v. Axell, 235 Cal App 3d 836, 1 Cal Rptr 2d 411 (1991), rev den (1992); State v. Brown, 470 NW2d 30 (Iowa 1991); Spencer v. Commonwealth, 240 Va 78, 393 SE2d 609 , cert den 498 US 908 (1990); Caldwell v. State, 260 Ga 278, 393 SE2

1996See, e.g., Taylor v. State, 889 P2d 319 (Okl App 1995) (under Daubert standard); Fishback v. People, 851 P2d 884 (Colo 1993); State v. Cauthron, 120 Wash 2d 879, 846 P2d 502 (1993); State v. Montalbo, 73 Haw 130, 828 P2d 1274 (1992); Rivera v. State, 840 P2d 933 (Wyo 1992); Robinson v. State, 610 So 2d 1288 (Fla 1992); Polk v. State, 612 So 2d 381 (Miss 1992); People v. Axell, 235 Cal App 3d 836, 1 Cal Rptr 2d 411 (1991), rev den (1992); State v. Brown, 470 NW2d 30 (Iowa 1991); Spencer v. Commonwealth, 240 Va 78, 393 SE2d 609 , cert den 498 US 908 (1990); Caldwell v. State, 260 Ga 278, 393 SE2

11996–1996
State v. Montalbo green
haw · 1992
1 sentence

1996See, e.g., Taylor v. State, 889 P2d 319 (Okl App 1995) (under Daubert standard); Fishback v. People, 851 P2d 884 (Colo 1993); State v. Cauthron, 120 Wash 2d 879, 846 P2d 502 (1993); State v. Montalbo, 73 Haw 130, 828 P2d 1274 (1992); Rivera v. State, 840 P2d 933 (Wyo 1992); Robinson v. State, 610 So 2d 1288 (Fla 1992); Polk v. State, 612 So 2d 381 (Miss 1992); People v. Axell, 235 Cal App 3d 836, 1 Cal Rptr 2d 411 (1991), rev den (1992); State v. Brown, 470 NW2d 30 (Iowa 1991); Spencer v. Commonwealth, 240 Va 78, 393 SE2d 609 , cert den 498 US 908 (1990); Caldwell v. State, 260 Ga 278, 393 SE2

11996–1996
State v. Brown green
iowa · 1991
1 sentence

1996See, e.g., Taylor v. State, 889 P2d 319 (Okl App 1995) (under Daubert standard); Fishback v. People, 851 P2d 884 (Colo 1993); State v. Cauthron, 120 Wash 2d 879, 846 P2d 502 (1993); State v. Montalbo, 73 Haw 130, 828 P2d 1274 (1992); Rivera v. State, 840 P2d 933 (Wyo 1992); Robinson v. State, 610 So 2d 1288 (Fla 1992); Polk v. State, 612 So 2d 381 (Miss 1992); People v. Axell, 235 Cal App 3d 836, 1 Cal Rptr 2d 411 (1991), rev den (1992); State v. Brown, 470 NW2d 30 (Iowa 1991); Spencer v. Commonwealth, 240 Va 78, 393 SE2d 609 , cert den 498 US 908 (1990); Caldwell v. State, 260 Ga 278, 393 SE2

11996–1996
Spencer v. Commonwealth green
va · 1990
1 sentence

1996See, e.g., Taylor v. State, 889 P2d 319 (Okl App 1995) (under Daubert standard); Fishback v. People, 851 P2d 884 (Colo 1993); State v. Cauthron, 120 Wash 2d 879, 846 P2d 502 (1993); State v. Montalbo, 73 Haw 130, 828 P2d 1274 (1992); Rivera v. State, 840 P2d 933 (Wyo 1992); Robinson v. State, 610 So 2d 1288 (Fla 1992); Polk v. State, 612 So 2d 381 (Miss 1992); People v. Axell, 235 Cal App 3d 836, 1 Cal Rptr 2d 411 (1991), rev den (1992); State v. Brown, 470 NW2d 30 (Iowa 1991); Spencer v. Commonwealth, 240 Va 78, 393 SE2d 609 , cert den 498 US 908 (1990); Caldwell v. State, 260 Ga 278, 393 SE2

11996–1996
Caldwell v. State green
ga · 1990
1 sentence

1996See, e.g., Taylor v. State, 889 P2d 319 (Okl App 1995) (under Daubert standard); Fishback v. People, 851 P2d 884 (Colo 1993); State v. Cauthron, 120 Wash 2d 879, 846 P2d 502 (1993); State v. Montalbo, 73 Haw 130, 828 P2d 1274 (1992); Rivera v. State, 840 P2d 933 (Wyo 1992); Robinson v. State, 610 So 2d 1288 (Fla 1992); Polk v. State, 612 So 2d 381 (Miss 1992); People v. Axell, 235 Cal App 3d 836, 1 Cal Rptr 2d 411 (1991), rev den (1992); State v. Brown, 470 NW2d 30 (Iowa 1991); Spencer v. Commonwealth, 240 Va 78, 393 SE2d 609 , cert den 498 US 908 (1990); Caldwell v. State, 260 Ga 278, 393 SE2

11996–1996
People v. Wesley green
nyappdiv · 1992
1 sentence

1996See, e.g., Taylor v. State, 889 P2d 319 (Okl App 1995) (under Daubert standard); Fishback v. People, 851 P2d 884 (Colo 1993); State v. Cauthron, 120 Wash 2d 879, 846 P2d 502 (1993); State v. Montalbo, 73 Haw 130, 828 P2d 1274 (1992); Rivera v. State, 840 P2d 933 (Wyo 1992); Robinson v. State, 610 So 2d 1288 (Fla 1992); Polk v. State, 612 So 2d 381 (Miss 1992); People v. Axell, 235 Cal App 3d 836, 1 Cal Rptr 2d 411 (1991), rev den (1992); State v. Brown, 470 NW2d 30 (Iowa 1991); Spencer v. Commonwealth, 240 Va 78, 393 SE2d 609 , cert den 498 US 908 (1990); Caldwell v. State, 260 Ga 278, 393 SE2

11996–1996
State v. Herzog green
orctapp · 1993
2 sentences

1996In State v. Herzog, 125 Or App 10 , 864 P2d 1362 (1993), aff'd 324 Or 294 , 924 P2d 817 (1996) and State v. Futch, 123 Or App 176 , 860 P2d 264 (1993), aff'd 324 Or 297 , 924 P2d 832 (1996) the Court of Appeals held that, in general, forensic DNA evidence was admissible.

1996In State v. Herzog, 125 Or App 10 , 864 P2d 1362 (1993), aff'd 324 Or 294 , 924 P2d 817 (1996) and State v. Futch, 123 Or App 176 , 860 P2d 264 (1993), aff'd 324 Or 297 , 924 P2d 832 (1996) the Court of Appeals held that, in general, forensic DNA evidence was admissible.

11996–1996
State v. Futch green
or · 1996
2 sentences

1996In State v. Herzog, 125 Or App 10 , 864 P2d 1362 (1993), aff'd 324 Or 294 , 924 P2d 817 (1996) and State v. Futch, 123 Or App 176 , 860 P2d 264 (1993), aff'd 324 Or 297 , 924 P2d 832 (1996) the Court of Appeals held that, in general, forensic DNA evidence was admissible.

1996In State v. Herzog, 125 Or App 10 , 864 P2d 1362 (1993), aff'd 324 Or 294 , 924 P2d 817 (1996) and State v. Futch, 123 Or App 176 , 860 P2d 264 (1993), aff'd 324 Or 297 , 924 P2d 832 (1996) the Court of Appeals held that, in general, forensic DNA evidence was admissible.

11996–1996
State v. Herzog neutral
or · 1996
2 sentences

1996In State v. Herzog, 125 Or App 10 , 864 P2d 1362 (1993), aff'd 324 Or 294 , 924 P2d 817 (1996) and State v. Futch, 123 Or App 176 , 860 P2d 264 (1993), aff'd 324 Or 297 , 924 P2d 832 (1996) the Court of Appeals held that, in general, forensic DNA evidence was admissible.

1996In State v. Herzog, 125 Or App 10 , 864 P2d 1362 (1993), aff'd 324 Or 294 , 924 P2d 817 (1996) and State v. Futch, 123 Or App 176 , 860 P2d 264 (1993), aff'd 324 Or 297 , 924 P2d 832 (1996) the Court of Appeals held that, in general, forensic DNA evidence was admissible.

11996–1996
Rivera v. State green
wyo · 1992
1 sentence

1996See, e.g., Taylor v. State, 889 P2d 319 (Okl App 1995) (under Daubert standard); Fishback v. People, 851 P2d 884 (Colo 1993); State v. Cauthron, 120 Wash 2d 879, 846 P2d 502 (1993); State v. Montalbo, 73 Haw 130, 828 P2d 1274 (1992); Rivera v. State, 840 P2d 933 (Wyo 1992); Robinson v. State, 610 So 2d 1288 (Fla 1992); Polk v. State, 612 So 2d 381 (Miss 1992); People v. Axell, 235 Cal App 3d 836, 1 Cal Rptr 2d 411 (1991), rev den (1992); State v. Brown, 470 NW2d 30 (Iowa 1991); Spencer v. Commonwealth, 240 Va 78, 393 SE2d 609 , cert den 498 US 908 (1990); Caldwell v. State, 260 Ga 278, 393 SE2

11996–1996
Cobey v. State green
mdctspecapp · 1989
1 sentence

1996See, e.g., Taylor v. State, 889 P2d 319 (Okl App 1995) (under Daubert standard); Fishback v. People, 851 P2d 884 (Colo 1993); State v. Cauthron, 120 Wash 2d 879, 846 P2d 502 (1993); State v. Montalbo, 73 Haw 130, 828 P2d 1274 (1992); Rivera v. State, 840 P2d 933 (Wyo 1992); Robinson v. State, 610 So 2d 1288 (Fla 1992); Polk v. State, 612 So 2d 381 (Miss 1992); People v. Axell, 235 Cal App 3d 836, 1 Cal Rptr 2d 411 (1991), rev den (1992); State v. Brown, 470 NW2d 30 (Iowa 1991); Spencer v. Commonwealth, 240 Va 78, 393 SE2d 609 , cert den 498 US 908 (1990); Caldwell v. State, 260 Ga 278, 393 SE2

11996–1996
Brown v. United States green
scotus · 1992
1 sentence

1996See, e.g., Taylor v. State, 889 P2d 319 (Okl App 1995) (under Daubert standard); Fishback v. People, 851 P2d 884 (Colo 1993); State v. Cauthron, 120 Wash 2d 879, 846 P2d 502 (1993); State v. Montalbo, 73 Haw 130, 828 P2d 1274 (1992); Rivera v. State, 840 P2d 933 (Wyo 1992); Robinson v. State, 610 So 2d 1288 (Fla 1992); Polk v. State, 612 So 2d 381 (Miss 1992); People v. Axell, 235 Cal App 3d 836, 1 Cal Rptr 2d 411 (1991), rev den (1992); State v. Brown, 470 NW2d 30 (Iowa 1991); Spencer v. Commonwealth, 240 Va 78, 393 SE2d 609 , cert den 498 US 908 (1990); Caldwell v. State, 260 Ga 278, 393 SE2

11996–1996
Fishback v. People green
colo · 1993
1 sentence

1996See, e.g., Taylor v. State, 889 P2d 319 (Okl App 1995) (under Daubert standard); Fishback v. People, 851 P2d 884 (Colo 1993); State v. Cauthron, 120 Wash 2d 879, 846 P2d 502 (1993); State v. Montalbo, 73 Haw 130, 828 P2d 1274 (1992); Rivera v. State, 840 P2d 933 (Wyo 1992); Robinson v. State, 610 So 2d 1288 (Fla 1992); Polk v. State, 612 So 2d 381 (Miss 1992); People v. Axell, 235 Cal App 3d 836, 1 Cal Rptr 2d 411 (1991), rev den (1992); State v. Brown, 470 NW2d 30 (Iowa 1991); Spencer v. Commonwealth, 240 Va 78, 393 SE2d 609 , cert den 498 US 908 (1990); Caldwell v. State, 260 Ga 278, 393 SE2

11996–1996

Statutes the citing opinions construe

OR § Or. Rev. Stat. § 813.010 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

TX 149 (1996–2026) LA 145 (1994–2026) MS 126 (1996–2026) OH 102 (1998–2026) MI 82 (2004–2026) KY 81 (1995–2026) DE 59 (2000–2026) WI 55 (2013–2026) FL 48 (2001–2026) GA 42 (2004–2026) CT 39 (1997–2025) OK 38 (1994–2026) NE 35 (1994–2024) MD 35 (2000–2026) SD 34 (1996–2026) AZ 31 (1995–2026) NC 30 (2000–2025) NM 30 (1994–2022) AL 27 (1998–2025) MA 27 (1996–2025) KS 27 (1995–2026) NJ 24 (2000–2026) PA 24 (1997–2022) WY 23 (1999–2025) VT 23 (2000–2026) AK 23 (1999–2025) IN 21 (1995–2023) MT 20 (1994–2026) NY 18 (1997–2017) NH 18 (1994–2025) CA 18 (1995–2023) MO 18 (1995–2025) IL 17 (1998–2025) AR 17 (2003–2025) WV 14 (1995–2024) WA 13 (1994–2025) IA 12 (1997–2026) DC 10 (2011–2026) RI 9 (1999–2024) OR 6 (1996–2025) ID 6 (2002–2022) CO 6 (1999–2021) HI 6 (1997–2020) VI 6 (2001–2017) SC 6 (2000–2025) UT 5 (1996–2012) TN 5 (2002–2020) MN 5 (2000–2019) NV 3 (1998–2014) ME 2 (2003–2005) VA 2 (2004–2006) GU 2 (2021–2022)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check