Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Oregon opinions name it 2 courts 1996–2025 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oregon courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. O'Keygreen2 sentences2000O’Key, 321 Or at 306 . *500 The Brown and pertinent Daubert factors overlap to some degree and boil down to a seven-step test, subject to the caveat that these factors are not an exclusive list of considerations to be applied mechanically. 1996In State v. O’Key, 321 Or 285, 306-07 , 899 P2d 663 (1995), this court considered Daubert’s analysis and holding, but continued to follow the Brown standard under the Oregon Evidence Code. | 1 | 2 |
State v. Sampsongreen1 sentence2004Those factors vitiate the problem of the DRE protocol’s subjectivity, such as it is, and we conclude that the protocol satisfies this portion of the Brown / Daubert test.” Sampson, 167 Or App at 510 (emphasis added). | 1 | 1 |
Taylor v. Stategreen1 sentence1996See, e.g., Taylor v. State, 889 P2d 319 (Okl App 1995) (under Daubert standard); Fishback v. People, 851 P2d 884 (Colo 1993); State v. Cauthron, 120 Wash 2d 879, 846 P2d 502 (1993); State v. Montalbo, 73 Haw 130, 828 P2d 1274 (1992); Rivera v. State, 840 P2d 933 (Wyo 1992); Robinson v. State, 610 So 2d 1288 (Fla 1992); Polk v. State, 612 So 2d 381 (Miss 1992); People v. Axell, 235 Cal App 3d 836, 1 Cal Rptr 2d 411 (1991), rev den (1992); State v. Brown, 470 NW2d 30 (Iowa 1991); Spencer v. Commonwealth, 240 Va 78, 393 SE2d 609 , cert den 498 US 908 (1990); Caldwell v. State, 260 Ga 278, 393 SE2 | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oregon. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Adams
green
2 sentences2025The PCAST Report explained that, in light of the Daubert inquiry, “[i]t is the proper province of the scientific community to provide guidance concerning scientific standards for scientific valid- ity.” Ultimately, the report concluded that, “To establish foundational validity for a forensic fea- ture-comparison method, the following elements are required: “(a) a reproducible and consistent procedure for (i) identifying features in evidence samples; (ii) comparing the features in two samples; and (iii) determining, based on the similarity between the features in two sets of features, whether t 2025The PCAST Report explained that, in light of the Daubert inquiry, “[i]t is the proper province of the scientific community to provide guidance concerning scientific standards for scientific valid- ity.” Ultimately, the report concluded that, “To establish foundational validity for a forensic fea- ture-comparison method, the following elements are required: “(a) a reproducible and consistent procedure for (i) identifying features in evidence samples; (ii) comparing the features in two samples; and (iii) determining, based on the similarity between the features in two sets of features, whether t | 2 | 2025–2025 |
State v. Ortiz
green
2 sentences2024Other scholars have reached similar conclusions: “Daubert clearly establishes that trial judges must eval- uate expert scientific testimony ‘at the outset,’ and that their analysis should focus on whether the testimony con- stitutes ‘scientific knowledge that... will assist the trier of fact to understand or determine a fact in issue.’ Justice Cite as 372 Or 658 (2024) 687 Blackmun’s opinion requires [courts] to undertake ‘a pre- liminary assessment of whether the reasoning or method- ology underlying the testimony is scientifically valid and of whether that reasoning or methodology properly c 2024Other scholars have reached similar conclusions: “Daubert clearly establishes that trial judges must eval- uate expert scientific testimony ‘at the outset,’ and that their analysis should focus on whether the testimony con- stitutes ‘scientific knowledge that... will assist the trier of fact to understand or determine a fact in issue.’ Justice Cite as 372 Or 658 (2024) 687 Blackmun’s opinion requires [courts] to undertake ‘a pre- liminary assessment of whether the reasoning or method- ology underlying the testimony is scientifically valid and of whether that reasoning or methodology properly c | 1 | 2024–2024 |
United States v. Jakobetz
green
1 sentence1996See, e.g., Taylor v. State, 889 P2d 319 (Okl App 1995) (under Daubert standard); Fishback v. People, 851 P2d 884 (Colo 1993); State v. Cauthron, 120 Wash 2d 879, 846 P2d 502 (1993); State v. Montalbo, 73 Haw 130, 828 P2d 1274 (1992); Rivera v. State, 840 P2d 933 (Wyo 1992); Robinson v. State, 610 So 2d 1288 (Fla 1992); Polk v. State, 612 So 2d 381 (Miss 1992); People v. Axell, 235 Cal App 3d 836, 1 Cal Rptr 2d 411 (1991), rev den (1992); State v. Brown, 470 NW2d 30 (Iowa 1991); Spencer v. Commonwealth, 240 Va 78, 393 SE2d 609 , cert den 498 US 908 (1990); Caldwell v. State, 260 Ga 278, 393 SE2 | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Hamilton, as Natural Mother and Next Friend to Smith v. Texas
green
1 sentence1996See, e.g., Taylor v. State, 889 P2d 319 (Okl App 1995) (under Daubert standard); Fishback v. People, 851 P2d 884 (Colo 1993); State v. Cauthron, 120 Wash 2d 879, 846 P2d 502 (1993); State v. Montalbo, 73 Haw 130, 828 P2d 1274 (1992); Rivera v. State, 840 P2d 933 (Wyo 1992); Robinson v. State, 610 So 2d 1288 (Fla 1992); Polk v. State, 612 So 2d 381 (Miss 1992); People v. Axell, 235 Cal App 3d 836, 1 Cal Rptr 2d 411 (1991), rev den (1992); State v. Brown, 470 NW2d 30 (Iowa 1991); Spencer v. Commonwealth, 240 Va 78, 393 SE2d 609 , cert den 498 US 908 (1990); Caldwell v. State, 260 Ga 278, 393 SE2 | 1 | 1996–1996 |
State v. Futch
green
2 sentences1996In State v. Herzog, 125 Or App 10 , 864 P2d 1362 (1993), aff'd 324 Or 294 , 924 P2d 817 (1996) and State v. Futch, 123 Or App 176 , 860 P2d 264 (1993), aff'd 324 Or 297 , 924 P2d 832 (1996) the Court of Appeals held that, in general, forensic DNA evidence was admissible. 1996In State v. Herzog, 125 Or App 10 , 864 P2d 1362 (1993), aff'd 324 Or 294 , 924 P2d 817 (1996) and State v. Futch, 123 Or App 176 , 860 P2d 264 (1993), aff'd 324 Or 297 , 924 P2d 832 (1996) the Court of Appeals held that, in general, forensic DNA evidence was admissible. | 1 | 1996–1996 |
State v. Cauthron
green
1 sentence1996See, e.g., Taylor v. State, 889 P2d 319 (Okl App 1995) (under Daubert standard); Fishback v. People, 851 P2d 884 (Colo 1993); State v. Cauthron, 120 Wash 2d 879, 846 P2d 502 (1993); State v. Montalbo, 73 Haw 130, 828 P2d 1274 (1992); Rivera v. State, 840 P2d 933 (Wyo 1992); Robinson v. State, 610 So 2d 1288 (Fla 1992); Polk v. State, 612 So 2d 381 (Miss 1992); People v. Axell, 235 Cal App 3d 836, 1 Cal Rptr 2d 411 (1991), rev den (1992); State v. Brown, 470 NW2d 30 (Iowa 1991); Spencer v. Commonwealth, 240 Va 78, 393 SE2d 609 , cert den 498 US 908 (1990); Caldwell v. State, 260 Ga 278, 393 SE2 | 1 | 1996–1996 |
People v. Wesley
green
2 sentences1996See, e.g., Taylor v. State, 889 P2d 319 (Okl App 1995) (under Daubert standard); Fishback v. People, 851 P2d 884 (Colo 1993); State v. Cauthron, 120 Wash 2d 879, 846 P2d 502 (1993); State v. Montalbo, 73 Haw 130, 828 P2d 1274 (1992); Rivera v. State, 840 P2d 933 (Wyo 1992); Robinson v. State, 610 So 2d 1288 (Fla 1992); Polk v. State, 612 So 2d 381 (Miss 1992); People v. Axell, 235 Cal App 3d 836, 1 Cal Rptr 2d 411 (1991), rev den (1992); State v. Brown, 470 NW2d 30 (Iowa 1991); Spencer v. Commonwealth, 240 Va 78, 393 SE2d 609 , cert den 498 US 908 (1990); Caldwell v. State, 260 Ga 278, 393 SE2 1996See, e.g., Taylor v. State, 889 P2d 319 (Okl App 1995) (under Daubert standard); Fishback v. People, 851 P2d 884 (Colo 1993); State v. Cauthron, 120 Wash 2d 879, 846 P2d 502 (1993); State v. Montalbo, 73 Haw 130, 828 P2d 1274 (1992); Rivera v. State, 840 P2d 933 (Wyo 1992); Robinson v. State, 610 So 2d 1288 (Fla 1992); Polk v. State, 612 So 2d 381 (Miss 1992); People v. Axell, 235 Cal App 3d 836, 1 Cal Rptr 2d 411 (1991), rev den (1992); State v. Brown, 470 NW2d 30 (Iowa 1991); Spencer v. Commonwealth, 240 Va 78, 393 SE2d 609 , cert den 498 US 908 (1990); Caldwell v. State, 260 Ga 278, 393 SE2 | 1 | 1996–1996 |
State v. Montalbo
green
1 sentence1996See, e.g., Taylor v. State, 889 P2d 319 (Okl App 1995) (under Daubert standard); Fishback v. People, 851 P2d 884 (Colo 1993); State v. Cauthron, 120 Wash 2d 879, 846 P2d 502 (1993); State v. Montalbo, 73 Haw 130, 828 P2d 1274 (1992); Rivera v. State, 840 P2d 933 (Wyo 1992); Robinson v. State, 610 So 2d 1288 (Fla 1992); Polk v. State, 612 So 2d 381 (Miss 1992); People v. Axell, 235 Cal App 3d 836, 1 Cal Rptr 2d 411 (1991), rev den (1992); State v. Brown, 470 NW2d 30 (Iowa 1991); Spencer v. Commonwealth, 240 Va 78, 393 SE2d 609 , cert den 498 US 908 (1990); Caldwell v. State, 260 Ga 278, 393 SE2 | 1 | 1996–1996 |
State v. Brown
green
1 sentence1996See, e.g., Taylor v. State, 889 P2d 319 (Okl App 1995) (under Daubert standard); Fishback v. People, 851 P2d 884 (Colo 1993); State v. Cauthron, 120 Wash 2d 879, 846 P2d 502 (1993); State v. Montalbo, 73 Haw 130, 828 P2d 1274 (1992); Rivera v. State, 840 P2d 933 (Wyo 1992); Robinson v. State, 610 So 2d 1288 (Fla 1992); Polk v. State, 612 So 2d 381 (Miss 1992); People v. Axell, 235 Cal App 3d 836, 1 Cal Rptr 2d 411 (1991), rev den (1992); State v. Brown, 470 NW2d 30 (Iowa 1991); Spencer v. Commonwealth, 240 Va 78, 393 SE2d 609 , cert den 498 US 908 (1990); Caldwell v. State, 260 Ga 278, 393 SE2 | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Spencer v. Commonwealth
green
1 sentence1996See, e.g., Taylor v. State, 889 P2d 319 (Okl App 1995) (under Daubert standard); Fishback v. People, 851 P2d 884 (Colo 1993); State v. Cauthron, 120 Wash 2d 879, 846 P2d 502 (1993); State v. Montalbo, 73 Haw 130, 828 P2d 1274 (1992); Rivera v. State, 840 P2d 933 (Wyo 1992); Robinson v. State, 610 So 2d 1288 (Fla 1992); Polk v. State, 612 So 2d 381 (Miss 1992); People v. Axell, 235 Cal App 3d 836, 1 Cal Rptr 2d 411 (1991), rev den (1992); State v. Brown, 470 NW2d 30 (Iowa 1991); Spencer v. Commonwealth, 240 Va 78, 393 SE2d 609 , cert den 498 US 908 (1990); Caldwell v. State, 260 Ga 278, 393 SE2 | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Caldwell v. State
green
1 sentence1996See, e.g., Taylor v. State, 889 P2d 319 (Okl App 1995) (under Daubert standard); Fishback v. People, 851 P2d 884 (Colo 1993); State v. Cauthron, 120 Wash 2d 879, 846 P2d 502 (1993); State v. Montalbo, 73 Haw 130, 828 P2d 1274 (1992); Rivera v. State, 840 P2d 933 (Wyo 1992); Robinson v. State, 610 So 2d 1288 (Fla 1992); Polk v. State, 612 So 2d 381 (Miss 1992); People v. Axell, 235 Cal App 3d 836, 1 Cal Rptr 2d 411 (1991), rev den (1992); State v. Brown, 470 NW2d 30 (Iowa 1991); Spencer v. Commonwealth, 240 Va 78, 393 SE2d 609 , cert den 498 US 908 (1990); Caldwell v. State, 260 Ga 278, 393 SE2 | 1 | 1996–1996 |
People v. Wesley
green
1 sentence1996See, e.g., Taylor v. State, 889 P2d 319 (Okl App 1995) (under Daubert standard); Fishback v. People, 851 P2d 884 (Colo 1993); State v. Cauthron, 120 Wash 2d 879, 846 P2d 502 (1993); State v. Montalbo, 73 Haw 130, 828 P2d 1274 (1992); Rivera v. State, 840 P2d 933 (Wyo 1992); Robinson v. State, 610 So 2d 1288 (Fla 1992); Polk v. State, 612 So 2d 381 (Miss 1992); People v. Axell, 235 Cal App 3d 836, 1 Cal Rptr 2d 411 (1991), rev den (1992); State v. Brown, 470 NW2d 30 (Iowa 1991); Spencer v. Commonwealth, 240 Va 78, 393 SE2d 609 , cert den 498 US 908 (1990); Caldwell v. State, 260 Ga 278, 393 SE2 | 1 | 1996–1996 |
State v. Herzog
green
2 sentences1996In State v. Herzog, 125 Or App 10 , 864 P2d 1362 (1993), aff'd 324 Or 294 , 924 P2d 817 (1996) and State v. Futch, 123 Or App 176 , 860 P2d 264 (1993), aff'd 324 Or 297 , 924 P2d 832 (1996) the Court of Appeals held that, in general, forensic DNA evidence was admissible. 1996In State v. Herzog, 125 Or App 10 , 864 P2d 1362 (1993), aff'd 324 Or 294 , 924 P2d 817 (1996) and State v. Futch, 123 Or App 176 , 860 P2d 264 (1993), aff'd 324 Or 297 , 924 P2d 832 (1996) the Court of Appeals held that, in general, forensic DNA evidence was admissible. | 1 | 1996–1996 |
State v. Futch
green
2 sentences1996In State v. Herzog, 125 Or App 10 , 864 P2d 1362 (1993), aff'd 324 Or 294 , 924 P2d 817 (1996) and State v. Futch, 123 Or App 176 , 860 P2d 264 (1993), aff'd 324 Or 297 , 924 P2d 832 (1996) the Court of Appeals held that, in general, forensic DNA evidence was admissible. 1996In State v. Herzog, 125 Or App 10 , 864 P2d 1362 (1993), aff'd 324 Or 294 , 924 P2d 817 (1996) and State v. Futch, 123 Or App 176 , 860 P2d 264 (1993), aff'd 324 Or 297 , 924 P2d 832 (1996) the Court of Appeals held that, in general, forensic DNA evidence was admissible. | 1 | 1996–1996 |
State v. Herzog
neutral
2 sentences1996In State v. Herzog, 125 Or App 10 , 864 P2d 1362 (1993), aff'd 324 Or 294 , 924 P2d 817 (1996) and State v. Futch, 123 Or App 176 , 860 P2d 264 (1993), aff'd 324 Or 297 , 924 P2d 832 (1996) the Court of Appeals held that, in general, forensic DNA evidence was admissible. 1996In State v. Herzog, 125 Or App 10 , 864 P2d 1362 (1993), aff'd 324 Or 294 , 924 P2d 817 (1996) and State v. Futch, 123 Or App 176 , 860 P2d 264 (1993), aff'd 324 Or 297 , 924 P2d 832 (1996) the Court of Appeals held that, in general, forensic DNA evidence was admissible. | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Rivera v. State
green
1 sentence1996See, e.g., Taylor v. State, 889 P2d 319 (Okl App 1995) (under Daubert standard); Fishback v. People, 851 P2d 884 (Colo 1993); State v. Cauthron, 120 Wash 2d 879, 846 P2d 502 (1993); State v. Montalbo, 73 Haw 130, 828 P2d 1274 (1992); Rivera v. State, 840 P2d 933 (Wyo 1992); Robinson v. State, 610 So 2d 1288 (Fla 1992); Polk v. State, 612 So 2d 381 (Miss 1992); People v. Axell, 235 Cal App 3d 836, 1 Cal Rptr 2d 411 (1991), rev den (1992); State v. Brown, 470 NW2d 30 (Iowa 1991); Spencer v. Commonwealth, 240 Va 78, 393 SE2d 609 , cert den 498 US 908 (1990); Caldwell v. State, 260 Ga 278, 393 SE2 | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Cobey v. State
green
1 sentence1996See, e.g., Taylor v. State, 889 P2d 319 (Okl App 1995) (under Daubert standard); Fishback v. People, 851 P2d 884 (Colo 1993); State v. Cauthron, 120 Wash 2d 879, 846 P2d 502 (1993); State v. Montalbo, 73 Haw 130, 828 P2d 1274 (1992); Rivera v. State, 840 P2d 933 (Wyo 1992); Robinson v. State, 610 So 2d 1288 (Fla 1992); Polk v. State, 612 So 2d 381 (Miss 1992); People v. Axell, 235 Cal App 3d 836, 1 Cal Rptr 2d 411 (1991), rev den (1992); State v. Brown, 470 NW2d 30 (Iowa 1991); Spencer v. Commonwealth, 240 Va 78, 393 SE2d 609 , cert den 498 US 908 (1990); Caldwell v. State, 260 Ga 278, 393 SE2 | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Brown v. United States
green
1 sentence1996See, e.g., Taylor v. State, 889 P2d 319 (Okl App 1995) (under Daubert standard); Fishback v. People, 851 P2d 884 (Colo 1993); State v. Cauthron, 120 Wash 2d 879, 846 P2d 502 (1993); State v. Montalbo, 73 Haw 130, 828 P2d 1274 (1992); Rivera v. State, 840 P2d 933 (Wyo 1992); Robinson v. State, 610 So 2d 1288 (Fla 1992); Polk v. State, 612 So 2d 381 (Miss 1992); People v. Axell, 235 Cal App 3d 836, 1 Cal Rptr 2d 411 (1991), rev den (1992); State v. Brown, 470 NW2d 30 (Iowa 1991); Spencer v. Commonwealth, 240 Va 78, 393 SE2d 609 , cert den 498 US 908 (1990); Caldwell v. State, 260 Ga 278, 393 SE2 | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Fishback v. People
green
1 sentence1996See, e.g., Taylor v. State, 889 P2d 319 (Okl App 1995) (under Daubert standard); Fishback v. People, 851 P2d 884 (Colo 1993); State v. Cauthron, 120 Wash 2d 879, 846 P2d 502 (1993); State v. Montalbo, 73 Haw 130, 828 P2d 1274 (1992); Rivera v. State, 840 P2d 933 (Wyo 1992); Robinson v. State, 610 So 2d 1288 (Fla 1992); Polk v. State, 612 So 2d 381 (Miss 1992); People v. Axell, 235 Cal App 3d 836, 1 Cal Rptr 2d 411 (1991), rev den (1992); State v. Brown, 470 NW2d 30 (Iowa 1991); Spencer v. Commonwealth, 240 Va 78, 393 SE2d 609 , cert den 498 US 908 (1990); Caldwell v. State, 260 Ga 278, 393 SE2 | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.