6 South Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 1972–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by South Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Walsh v. Woodsgreen2 sentences2016See Walsh v. Woods, 358 S.C. 259, 264 , 594 S.E.2d 548, 551 (Ct. App. 2004) (“In analyzing a limitations defense, the fundamental test for determining whether a cause of action has accrued is whether the party asserting the claim can maintain an action to enforce it. 2016See Walsh v. Woods, 358 S.C. 259, 264 , 594 S.E.2d 548, 551 (Ct. App. 2004) (“In analyzing a limitations defense, the fundamental test for determining whether a cause of action has accrued is whether the party asserting the claim can maintain an action to enforce it. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in South Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Matthews v. City of Greenwood
green
2 sentences2010In analyzing a limitations defense, “[t]he fundamental test for determining whether a cause of action has accrued is whether the party asserting the claim can maintain an action to enforce it.” Id. (quoting Matthews, 305 S.C. at 269 , 407 S.E.2d at 669 ). 2010In analyzing a limitations defense, “[t]he fundamental test for determining whether a cause of action has accrued is whether the party asserting the claim can maintain an action to enforce it.” Id. (quoting Matthews, 305 S.C. at 269 , 407 S.E.2d at 669 ). | 3 | 2000–2010 |
Aryeh v. Canon Business Solutions, Inc.
green
2 sentences2019Solutions, Inc. , 55 Cal.4th 1185 , 151 Cal.Rptr.3d 827 , 292 P.3d 871 , 880 (2013) ). 2019Solutions, Inc. , 55 Cal.4th 1185 , 151 Cal.Rptr.3d 827 , 292 P.3d 871 , 880 (2013) ). | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Brown v. Finger
green
2 sentences2000Thus, a particular cause of action accrues “at the moment when the plaintiff has a legal right to sue on it.” Id. (citing Brown v. Finger, 240 S.C. 102 , 124 S.E.2d 781 (1962)). 2000Thus, a particular cause of action accrues “at the moment when the plaintiff has a legal right to sue on it.” Id. (citing Brown v. Finger, 240 S.C. 102 , 124 S.E.2d 781 (1962)). | 1 | 2000–2000 |
State v. Anderson
green
1 sentence1972The limitations of the rule were stated by our Court in State v. Anderson, 253 S. C. 168, 169 S. E. (2d) 706 (1964): “We hold, however, that the policy of reviewing questions not preserved during the trial does not extend to cases in which the defendant has received a sentence less than death. | 1 | 1972–1972 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.