Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Arkansas opinions name it 2 courts 1982–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arkansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arkansas. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arkansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Wilson v. State
neutral
2 sentences2025State v. Bullock, 262 Ark. 394 , 557 S.W.2d 193 (1977); Wilson v. State, 277 Ark. 43 , 639 S.W.2d 45 (1982). 2025State v. Bullock, 262 Ark. 394 , 557 S.W.2d 193 (1977); Wilson v. State, 277 Ark. 43 , 639 S.W.2d 45 (1982). | 1 | 2025–2025 |
State v. Bullock
green
2 sentences2025State v. Bullock, 262 Ark. 394 , 557 S.W.2d 193 (1977); Wilson v. State, 277 Ark. 43 , 639 S.W.2d 45 (1982). 2025State v. Bullock, 262 Ark. 394 , 557 S.W.2d 193 (1977); Wilson v. State, 277 Ark. 43 , 639 S.W.2d 45 (1982). | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Scalco v. State
green
1 sentence2015Jenkins v. State, 301 Ark. 20 , 781 S.W.2d 461 (1989); Scalco v. State, 42 Ark. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Jenkins v. State
green
2 sentences2015Jenkins v. State, 301 Ark. 20 , 781 S.W.2d 461 (1989); Scalco v. State, 42 Ark. 2015Jenkins v. State, 301 Ark. 20 , 781 S.W.2d 461 (1989); Scalco v. State, 42 Ark. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
green
1 sentence2008Alpharma responds, arguing that the circuit court did not abuse its discretion in limiting Dr. O’Connor’s testimony and excluding Table 9. 4 Specifically, it asserts that the circuit court properly applied the admissibility factors set forth in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), and Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. of Arkansas, Inc. v. Foote, 341 Ark. 105 , 14 S.W.3d 512 (2000), to Dr. O’Connor’s methodology in constructing Table 9 and in excluding Table 9 and any testimony or opinions concerning or relying on it. | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. Foote
green
2 sentences2008Alpharma responds, arguing that the circuit court did not abuse its discretion in limiting Dr. O’Connor’s testimony and excluding Table 9. 4 Specifically, it asserts that the circuit court properly applied the admissibility factors set forth in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), and Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. of Arkansas, Inc. v. Foote, 341 Ark. 105 , 14 S.W.3d 512 (2000), to Dr. O’Connor’s methodology in constructing Table 9 and in excluding Table 9 and any testimony or opinions concerning or relying on it. 2008Alpharma responds, arguing that the circuit court did not abuse its discretion in limiting Dr. O’Connor’s testimony and excluding Table 9. 4 Specifically, it asserts that the circuit court properly applied the admissibility factors set forth in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), and Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. of Arkansas, Inc. v. Foote, 341 Ark. 105 , 14 S.W.3d 512 (2000), to Dr. O’Connor’s methodology in constructing Table 9 and in excluding Table 9 and any testimony or opinions concerning or relying on it. | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Weaver v. State
green
2 sentences1987However, the appellee cites Weaver v. State, 290 Ark. 556 , 720 S.W.2d 905 (1986), as authority for the admissibility of the test report. 1987However, the appellee cites Weaver v. State, 290 Ark. 556 , 720 S.W.2d 905 (1986), as authority for the admissibility of the test report. | 1 | 1987–1987 |
St. Paul Insurance v. Touzin
green
1 sentence1982Co. v. Touzin, 267 Ark. 539 , 592 S.W. 2d 448 (1980), the court discussed fully the admissibility of such test in the following analysis: The Court of Appeals, for two reasons, was mistaken in holding that the insurance carrier had not laid a sufficient foundation for the introduction of the results of the blood-alcohol test. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.