5 District of Columbia opinions name it 1 courts 1984–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by District of Columbia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Geft Outdoors, LLC v. City of Westfieldgreen1 sentence2023See, e.g., GEFT Outdoors, LLC v. City of Westfield, 922 F.3d 357, 366 (7th Cir. 2019) (rejecting procedural-due-process claim resting on argument that city-issued notices did not comply with requirements of state law; “[T]here is no constitutional procedural due process right to state-mandated procedures.”); Onyx Props. | 1 | 1 |
Matter of Pggreen2 sentences1990In In re P.G., 452 A.2d 1183 (D.C.1982), the court again rejected a constitutional due process challenge to the statute, holding that no decision of the Supreme Court required a finding of unfitness of the natural parent before the rights could be terminated over his objection. 1990In In re P.G., 452 A.2d 1183 (D.C.1982), the court again rejected a constitutional due process challenge to the statute, holding that no decision of the Supreme Court required a finding of unfitness of the natural parent before the rights could be terminated over his objection. | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Myrtle D. Washington, (Two Cases)green2 sentences1984See United States v. Washington, 227 U.S. App.D.C. 184, 192-93 n. 5, 705 F.2d 489 , 497-98 n. 5 (1983). 1984See United States v. Washington, 227 U.S. App.D.C. 184, 192-93 n. 5, 705 F.2d 489 , 497-98 n. 5 (1983). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in District of Columbia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Neder v. United States
green
2 sentences2014The government states in a footnote that Mr. Thompkins “concedes that he did not object to the APOWA instructions,” and the government contends that this failure “dooms his claim.” Citing Neder v. United States, 527 U.S. 1 , 119 S.Ct. 1827 , 144 L.Ed.2d 35 (1999), and emphasizing Mr. Thompkins’s convictions of “multiple ADWs based on the barrage of bullets Mr. Thompkins (and his confederates) fired in Officers Geddies and Evel/s direction,” the government also asserts that, “[n]o rational jury could have convicted [Mr.] Thompkins of ADW on those facts -without also finding that [Mr.] Thompkins 2014The government states in a footnote that Mr. Thompkins “concedes that he did not object to the APOWA instructions,” and the government contends that this failure “dooms his claim.” Citing Neder v. United States, 527 U.S. 1 , 119 S.Ct. 1827 , 144 L.Ed.2d 35 (1999), and emphasizing Mr. Thompkins’s convictions of “multiple ADWs based on the barrage of bullets Mr. Thompkins (and his confederates) fired in Officers Geddies and Evel/s direction,” the government also asserts that, “[n]o rational jury could have convicted [Mr.] Thompkins of ADW on those facts -without also finding that [Mr.] Thompkins | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Bracy v. Gramley
green
2 sentences2005Instead, Shepherd relies on Bracy v. Gramley, 520 U.S. 899 , 117 S.Ct. 1793 , 138 L.Ed.2d 97 (1997), a case in which the defendant alleged he was prejudiced because the presiding judge, who ultimately was convicted for taking bribes from some criminal defendants, unfairly aided in the prosecution of his and other cases to cover up for the judge’s misconduct. 2005Instead, Shepherd relies on Bracy v. Gramley, 520 U.S. 899 , 117 S.Ct. 1793 , 138 L.Ed.2d 97 (1997), a case in which the defendant alleged he was prejudiced because the presiding judge, who ultimately was convicted for taking bribes from some criminal defendants, unfairly aided in the prosecution of his and other cases to cover up for the judge’s misconduct. | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Santosky v. Kramer
green
2 sentences1990The court distinguished Caban v. Mohammed, 441 U.S. 380 , 99 S.Ct. 1760 , 60 L.Ed.2d 297 (1979) as involving the equal protection clause, and noted that in Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745 , 102 S.Ct. 1388 , 71 L.Ed.2d 599 (1982), the Court "carefully refrained from any constitutional holding regarding the substantive criteria, limiting its attention to the standard of proof.” 452 A.2d at 1185. 1990The court distinguished Caban v. Mohammed, 441 U.S. 380 , 99 S.Ct. 1760 , 60 L.Ed.2d 297 (1979) as involving the equal protection clause, and noted that in Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745 , 102 S.Ct. 1388 , 71 L.Ed.2d 599 (1982), the Court "carefully refrained from any constitutional holding regarding the substantive criteria, limiting its attention to the standard of proof.” 452 A.2d at 1185. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Caban v. Mohammed
green
2 sentences1990The court distinguished Caban v. Mohammed, 441 U.S. 380 , 99 S.Ct. 1760 , 60 L.Ed.2d 297 (1979) as involving the equal protection clause, and noted that in Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745 , 102 S.Ct. 1388 , 71 L.Ed.2d 599 (1982), the Court "carefully refrained from any constitutional holding regarding the substantive criteria, limiting its attention to the standard of proof.” 452 A.2d at 1185. 1990The court distinguished Caban v. Mohammed, 441 U.S. 380 , 99 S.Ct. 1760 , 60 L.Ed.2d 297 (1979) as involving the equal protection clause, and noted that in Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745 , 102 S.Ct. 1388 , 71 L.Ed.2d 599 (1982), the Court "carefully refrained from any constitutional holding regarding the substantive criteria, limiting its attention to the standard of proof.” 452 A.2d at 1185. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.