7 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1977–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
E.S. v. Bartholomew County Department of Public Welfare
green
2 sentences1993Matter of VMS, 446 N.E.2d at 636 . 1993Matter of VMS, 446 N.E.2d at 636 . | 2 | 1993–1993 |
Marion County Auditor v. Sawmill Creek, LLC
green
2 sentences2023Sawmill Creek moved to set aside the tax sale, alleging the “provide[d] notice of the pending sale of its property violated the constitutional due process requirement articulated by the U.S. Supreme Court in Jones v. Flowers.” Id. at 217 . 2023After examining whether the auditor acted “as one desirous of actually informing[,]” id. at 219 , we concluded the auditor satisfied the Flowers due-process requirements because once the auditor learned that the notice was not delivered, the auditor published notice in additional ways and searched for a better mailing address, id. at 220–22. | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Williams v. City of Indianapolis Department of Public Works
green
1 sentence2011Id. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Boffo v. Boone County Board of Zoning Appeals
green
2 sentences2003McBride, 579 N.E.2d at 1315 (citing Boffo, 421 N.E.2d at 1129 ). 2003McBride, 579 N.E.2d at 1315 (citing Boffo, 421 N.E.2d at 1129 ). | 1 | 2003–2003 |
McBride v. Board of Zoning Appeals
green
2 sentences2003McBride, 579 N.E.2d at 1315 (citing Boffo, 421 N.E.2d at 1129 ). 2003McBride, 579 N.E.2d at 1315 (citing Boffo, 421 N.E.2d at 1129 ). | 1 | 2003–2003 |
ABC v. Biltz
neutral
2 sentences1980Indiana Alcoholic Beverage Commission v. Biltz, (1968) 142 Ind.App. 418 , 235 N.E.2d 79 , 81-82. [Emphasis omitted.] Warren and its progeny have held that the availability of judicial review of administrative decisions is a constitutional due process requirement. 1980Indiana Alcoholic Beverage Commission v. Biltz, (1968) 142 Ind.App. 418 , 235 N.E.2d 79 , 81-82. [Emphasis omitted.] Warren and its progeny have held that the availability of judicial review of administrative decisions is a constitutional due process requirement. | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Warren v. Indiana Telephone Co.
green
2 sentences1977This Court first set forth the constitutional requirements in Warren v. Indiana Telephone Co., (1940) 217 Ind. 93 , 26 N.E. 2d 399 , and held that the availability of judicial review of administrative decisions was a constitutional due process requirement, saying: “As an administrative agency, the [Industrial Board] is properly vested with power to determine facts, and the exercise of that power meets the requirements of due process of law, so far as the function of determining facts is concerned. 1977This Court first set forth the constitutional requirements in Warren v. Indiana Telephone Co., (1940) 217 Ind. 93 , 26 N.E. 2d 399 , and held that the availability of judicial review of administrative decisions was a constitutional due process requirement, saying: “As an administrative agency, the [Industrial Board] is properly vested with power to determine facts, and the exercise of that power meets the requirements of due process of law, so far as the function of determining facts is concerned. | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.