Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
16 Pennsylvania opinions name it 3 courts 1971–2026 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Commonwealth v. Chamberlaingreen1 sentence2026Commonwealth v. Chamberlain, 30 A.3d 381, 405 (Pa. 2011). | 1 | 1 |
Sandin v. Connergreen1 sentence2025However, a constitutional due process violation occurs only when the prison “imposes atypical and significant hardship on the inmate in relation to the ordinary incidents of prison life.” Feliciano, 250 A.3d at 1275 (quoting Sandin v. Conner, 515 U.S. 472, 484 (1995)). | 1 | 1 |
Winpenny v. Krotowgreen2 sentences1993See also Winpenny v. Krotow, 574 F.2d 176 (3d Cir.1978) (constitutional challenge to imposition of lien under Pennsylvania law through filing of municipal claim without a pre-filing hearing is controlled by Supreme Court's summary affirmance in Sager ). [8] A third alternative is another procedurally unusual feature of enforcement of municipal claims. 1993See also Winpenny v. Krotow, 574 F.2d 176 (3d Cir.1978) (constitutional challenge to imposition of lien under Pennsylvania law through filing of municipal claim without a pre-filing hearing is controlled by Supreme Court's summary affirmance in Sager). . | 1 | 1 |
Morrissey v. Brewergreen1 sentence1977Bunner first contends that the notices fail to satisfy the constitutional due process requirement of Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471, 489 (1972), that a recommitted parolee must be given “a written statement by the factfinders as to the evidence relied on and reasons for revoking parole,” and that they also fail to comply with a Board regulation to similar effect found at 37 Pa. Code 71.2(19). | 1 | 1 |
Morgan v. United Statesgreen1 sentence1971Morgan v. U.S., 298 U.S. 468, 481 (1936) (“Argument may be oral or written.”). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Brady v. Maryland
green
2 sentences2001The failure to disclose this information is, according to Appellant, a constitutional due process violation under the rationale of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 , 83 S.Ct. 1194 , 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963). 2001The failure to disclose this information is, according to Appellant, a constitutional due process violation under the rationale of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 , 83 S.Ct. 1194 , 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963). | 2 | 2001–2004 |
Commonwealth v. Smith
green
1 sentence2026Id. at 137 . | 1 | 2026–2026 |
Shore v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections
green
1 sentence2019Shore v. Dep’t of Corr., 168 A.3d 374 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2017). | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Alabama v. Smith
green
1 sentence2015In his fourth issue, Appellant raises a constitutional due process challenge to his sentence by invoking North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711 (1969), overruled on other grounds, Alabama v. Smith, 490 U.S. 794 (1989). | 1 | 2015–2015 |
North Carolina v. Pearce
red
1 sentence2015In his fourth issue, Appellant raises a constitutional due process challenge to his sentence by invoking North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711 (1969), overruled on other grounds, Alabama v. Smith, 490 U.S. 794 (1989). | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Wilkinson v. Austin
green
2 sentences2007Wilkinson, 545 U.S. at 214 , 125 S.Ct. 2384 (emphasis added). [11] Wilkinson is also distinguishable from the instant case because the constitutional due process inquiry in Wilkinson focused on Ohio's procedures for assigning or transferring inmates to the supermax facility. 2007Wilkinson, 545 U.S. at 214 , 125 S.Ct. 2384 (emphasis added). [11] Wilkinson is also distinguishable from the instant case because the constitutional due process inquiry in Wilkinson focused on Ohio's procedures for assigning or transferring inmates to the supermax facility. | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Commonwealth v. Bonomo
green
2 sentences1995Bonomo, supra, 396 Pa. 222 , 151 A.2d 441 . 1995Bonomo, supra, 396 Pa. 222 , 151 A.2d 441 . | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Sager v. Burgess
green
2 sentences1993The imposition of statutory liens for assessments under Pennsylvania law without first providing a hearing to the affected owner was upheld against a constitutional due process challenge, in part of the basis of the procedure for filing an affidavit of defense, in Sager v. Burgess, 350 F.Supp. 1310 (E.D.Pa.1972), summarily aff'd, 411 U.S. 941 , 93 S.Ct. 1923 , 36 L.Ed.2d 406 (1973). 1993The imposition of statutory liens for assessments under Pennsylvania law without first providing a hearing to the affected owner was upheld against a constitutional due process challenge, in part of the basis of the procedure for filing an affidavit of defense, in Sager v. Burgess, 350 F.Supp. 1310 (E.D.Pa.1972), summarily aff'd, 411 U.S. 941 , 93 S.Ct. 1923 , 36 L.Ed.2d 406 (1973). | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Sager v. Burgess of Pottstown
green
2 sentences1993The imposition of statutory liens for assessments under Pennsylvania law without first providing a hearing to the affected owner was upheld against a constitutional due process challenge, in part of the basis of the procedure for filing an affidavit of defense, in Sager v. Burgess, 350 F.Supp. 1310 (E.D.Pa.1972), summarily aff'd, 411 U.S. 941 , 93 S.Ct. 1923 , 36 L.Ed.2d 406 (1973). 1993The imposition of statutory liens for assessments under Pennsylvania law without first providing a hearing to the affected owner was upheld against a constitutional due process challenge, in part of the basis of the procedure for filing an affidavit of defense, in Sager v. Burgess, 350 F.Supp. 1310 (E.D.Pa.1972), summarily aff'd, 411 U.S. 941 , 93 S.Ct. 1923 , 36 L.Ed.2d 406 (1973). | 1 | 1993–1993 |
United States v. Johnson
green
1 sentence1992Matthews v. Johnson, 503 F.2d 339 (3rd Cir.1974); (2) the charge violated appellant’s constitutional due process right to a charge on voluntary manslaughter even in the absence of any evidence at trial supporting such a charge; (3) the charge interfered with the jury’s exercise of its “mercy-dispensing” power to return a verdict of voluntary manslaughter despite evidence proving guilt of a more serious degree of murder; (4) by structuring the jury’s consideration of the verdict as it did, the judge was acting as a “thirteenth juror” and usurping the jury’s prerogative to decide how it wanted t | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Hanson v. Denckla
green
2 sentences1981World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson, 444 U.S. 286 , 100 S.Ct. 559 , 62 L.Ed.2d 490 (1980); Hanson v. Denckla, 357 U.S. 235 , 78 S.Ct. 1228 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1283 (1958). 1981World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson, 444 U.S. 286 , 100 S.Ct. 559 , 62 L.Ed.2d 490 (1980); Hanson v. Denckla, 357 U.S. 235 , 78 S.Ct. 1228 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1283 (1958). | 1 | 1981–1981 |
World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson
green
2 sentences1981World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson, 444 U.S. 286 , 100 S.Ct. 559 , 62 L.Ed.2d 490 (1980); Hanson v. Denckla, 357 U.S. 235 , 78 S.Ct. 1228 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1283 (1958). 1981World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson, 444 U.S. 286 , 100 S.Ct. 559 , 62 L.Ed.2d 490 (1980); Hanson v. Denckla, 357 U.S. 235 , 78 S.Ct. 1228 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1283 (1958). | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Amesbury v. Luzerne County Institution District
green
2 sentences1980In Amesbury v. Luzerne County Institution District, 27 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 418 , 366 A.2d 631 (1976), we held that an employee of a county institution district, who had been given no guarantee of continued employment by statute or contract and was an employee at the will and pleasure of the commissioners of the district, was not entitled to a constitutional due process hearing nor a hearing under the Local Agency Law 1 before dismissal, since she had no property interest in continued employment and her dismissal was not an adjudication. 1980In Amesbury v. Luzerne County Institution District, 27 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 418 , 366 A.2d 631 (1976), we held that an employee of a county institution district, who had been given no guarantee of continued employment by statute or contract and was an employee at the will and pleasure of the commissioners of the district, was not entitled to a constitutional due process hearing nor a hearing under the Local Agency Law 1 before dismissal, since she had no property interest in continued employment and her dismissal was not an adjudication. | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Bishop v. Wood
green
1 sentence1976Amesbury was an employee at the will and pleasure of the commissioners of the Institution District and not entitled to a constitutional due-process hearing, because she had no property interest in employment, Bishop v. Woods, U.S. , 48 L.Ed. 2d 684 (1976), nor to a hearing under the Local Agency Law because the Institution District did not make an adjudication as to her. | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.