5 Florida opinions name it 1 courts 1962–1981 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Ven-Fuel v. Jacksonville Elec. Auth.green1 sentence1981See Ven-Fuel v. Jacksonville Electric Authority, 332 So.2d 81 (Fla.3d DCA 1975); Zuckerman-Vernon Corp. v. Zelikoff, 303 So.2d 391 (Fla.3d DCA 1974); McCue v. Lane, 228 So.2d 101 (Fla.3d DCA 1969). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
McCue v. Lane
neutral
2 sentences1981See Ven-Fuel v. Jacksonville Electric Authority, 332 So.2d 81 (Fla.3d DCA 1975); Zuckerman-Vernon Corp. v. Zelikoff, 303 So.2d 391 (Fla.3d DCA 1974); McCue v. Lane, 228 So.2d 101 (Fla.3d DCA 1969). 1969Appellant’s contention that Rule 1.060, Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, 30 F.S.A., requires a transfer of its claim against the city to the appropriate court in Volusia County is contrary to the decision in McCue v. Lane, 228 So.2d 101 (Fla.App.1969), holding that it is improper to transfer only a portion of a case. | 2 | 1969–1981 |
Zuckerman-Vernon Corp. v. Zelikoff
neutral
1 sentence1981See Ven-Fuel v. Jacksonville Electric Authority, 332 So.2d 81 (Fla.3d DCA 1975); Zuckerman-Vernon Corp. v. Zelikoff, 303 So.2d 391 (Fla.3d DCA 1974); McCue v. Lane, 228 So.2d 101 (Fla.3d DCA 1969). | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Spencer v. Wainwright
neutral
1 sentence1980NOTES [1] Cf. Spencer v. Wainwright, 377 So.2d 38 (Fla. 1st DCA, 1979) where only a transfer hearing was held, so jeopardy did not attach. | 1 | 1980–1980 |
City of Miami v. Jafra Steel Corp.
green
1 sentence1967City of Miami v. Jafra Steel Corporation, supra. On doing so, we hold that the order entered in the civil court of record was eminently correct, and that the petitioner has not shown that in retaining the action for removal of tenant the respondents exceeded their jurisdiction or are acting without jurisdiction. | 1 | 1967–1967 |
STATE Ex Rel NILSEN v. BEAN
green
2 sentences1962State v. Bean, 1959, 218 Or. 506 , 346 P.2d 652 ; In re Osofsky, S.D.N.Y. 1931, 50 F.2d 241 ; Fible v. Crabb, 129 Ky. 461 , 112 S.W. 576 . 1962State v. Bean, 1959, 218 Or. 506 , 346 P.2d 652 ; In re Osofsky, S.D.N.Y. 1931, 50 F.2d 241 ; Fible v. Crabb, 129 Ky. 461 , 112 S.W. 576 . | 1 | 1962–1962 |
In re Osofsky
green
1 sentence1962State v. Bean, 1959, 218 Or. 506 , 346 P.2d 652 ; In re Osofsky, S.D.N.Y. 1931, 50 F.2d 241 ; Fible v. Crabb, 129 Ky. 461 , 112 S.W. 576 . | 1 | 1962–1962 |
Fible v. Crabb
neutral
2 sentences1962State v. Bean, 1959, 218 Or. 506 , 346 P.2d 652 ; In re Osofsky, S.D.N.Y. 1931, 50 F.2d 241 ; Fible v. Crabb, 129 Ky. 461 , 112 S.W. 576 . 1962State v. Bean, 1959, 218 Or. 506 , 346 P.2d 652 ; In re Osofsky, S.D.N.Y. 1931, 50 F.2d 241 ; Fible v. Crabb, 129 Ky. 461 , 112 S.W. 576 . | 1 | 1962–1962 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.