ILCS » Chapter 720 · Act 550
Illinois Compiled Statutes

720 ILCS 550/10.3 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(720 ILCS 550/10.3), Section 411.2 of the Illinois Controlled Substances Act
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 2008–2016 · leading case: People v. Williams, 2013 IL App (4th) 120313 (Ill. App. Ct. 2013).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
People v. Williams, 2013 IL App (4th) 120313 (Ill. App. Ct. 2013). · cites it 6× “2(a)(1)/ Cannabis 720 ILCS 550/10.3(a)(1) $3,000 * Cont. Sub.”
People v. Johnson, 2015 IL App (3d) 140364 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016). “Drug 720 ILCS 550/10.3(a) Eff. Fine- People v.”
People v. Rhodes, 899 N.E.2d 335 (Ill. App. Ct. 2008). “See 720 ILCS 550/ 10.3(a)(4) (West 2006). Of course, because defendant is entitled to a credit of either $1,360 or the sum total of the fines, whichever is less (see 725 ILCS 5/110 — 14(a) (West 2006)), this particular error is of no consequence.”
People v. Johnson, 2015 IL App (3d) 140364 (Ill. App. Ct. 2015). “Drug 720 ILCS 550/10.3(a) Eff. 1/1/92 Fine- People v.”
People v. Rhodes (Ill. App. Ct. 2008). “See 720 ILCS 550/10.3(a)(4) (West 2006). Of course, because defendant is entitled to a credit of either $1,360 or the sum total of the fines, whichever is less (see 725 ILCS 5/110--14(a) (West 2006)), this particular error is of no consequence.”
— 720 ILCS 550/10.3(a) — 2 cases
People v. Johnson, 2015 IL App (3d) 140364 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016). “Drug 720 ILCS 550/10.3(a) Eff. Fine- People v.”
People v. Johnson, 2015 IL App (3d) 140364 (Ill. App. Ct. 2015). “Drug 720 ILCS 550/10.3(a) Eff. 1/1/92 Fine- People v.”
— 720 ILCS 550/10.3(a)(1) — 1 case
People v. Williams, 2013 IL App (4th) 120313 (Ill. App. Ct. 2013). “2(a)(1)/ Cannabis 720 ILCS 550/10.3(a)(1) $3,000 * Cont. Sub.”
— 720 ILCS 550/10.3(a)(2) — 1 case
People v. Williams, 2013 IL App (4th) 120313 (Ill. App. Ct. 2013). “2(a)(1)/ Cannabis 720 ILCS 550/10.3(a)(1) $3,000 * Cont. Sub.”
— 720 ILCS 550/10.3(a)(3) — 1 case
People v. Williams, 2013 IL App (4th) 120313 (Ill. App. Ct. 2013). “2(a)(1)/ Cannabis 720 ILCS 550/10.3(a)(1) $3,000 * Cont. Sub.”
— 720 ILCS 550/10.3(a)(4) — 3 cases
People v. Williams, 2013 IL App (4th) 120313 (Ill. App. Ct. 2013). “2(a)(1)/ Cannabis 720 ILCS 550/10.3(a)(1) $3,000 * Cont. Sub.”
People v. Rhodes, 899 N.E.2d 335 (Ill. App. Ct. 2008). “See 720 ILCS 550/ 10.3(a)(4) (West 2006). Of course, because defendant is entitled to a credit of either $1,360 or the sum total of the fines, whichever is less (see 725 ILCS 5/110 — 14(a) (West 2006)), this particular error is of no consequence.”
People v. Rhodes (Ill. App. Ct. 2008). “See 720 ILCS 550/10.3(a)(4) (West 2006). Of course, because defendant is entitled to a credit of either $1,360 or the sum total of the fines, whichever is less (see 725 ILCS 5/110--14(a) (West 2006)), this particular error is of no consequence.”
— 720 ILCS 550/10.3(a)(5) — 1 case
People v. Williams, 2013 IL App (4th) 120313 (Ill. App. Ct. 2013). “2(a)(1)/ Cannabis 720 ILCS 550/10.3(a)(1) $3,000 * Cont. Sub.”
— 720 ILCS 550/10.3(a)(6) — 1 case
People v. Williams, 2013 IL App (4th) 120313 (Ill. App. Ct. 2013). “2(a)(1)/ Cannabis 720 ILCS 550/10.3(a)(1) $3,000 * Cont. Sub.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.