ILCS » Chapter 720 · Act 550
Illinois Compiled Statutes

720 ILCS 550/10.3 (2026)

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(720 ILCS 550/10.3), Section 411.2 of the Illinois Controlled Substances Act
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 2008–2016 · leading case: People v. Williams, 2013 IL App (4th) 120313, 991 N.E.2d 914.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
People v. Williams, 2013 IL App (4th) 120313, 991 N.E.2d 914. · cites it 6× “2(a)(1)/ Cannabis 720 ILCS 550/10.3(a)(1) $3,000 * Cont. Sub.”
People v. Johnson, 2015 IL App (3d) 140364. “Drug 720 ILCS 550/10.3(a) Eff. Fine- People v.”
People v. Rhodes, 899 N.E.2d 335 (Ill. App. Ct. 2d Dist. 2008). “See 720 ILCS 550/ 10.3(a)(4) (West 2006). Of course, because defendant is entitled to a credit of either $1,360 or the sum total of the fines, whichever is less (see 725 ILCS 5/110 — 14(a) (West 2006)), this particular error is of no consequence.”
People v. Johnson, 2015 IL App (3d) 140364, 46 N.E.3d 937. “Drug 720 ILCS 550/10.3(a) Eff. 1/1/92 Fine- People v.”
People v. Rhodes, No. 2-07-0619 Rel (Ill. App. Ct. 2d Dist. Nov. 13, 2008). “See 720 ILCS 550/10.3(a)(4) (West 2006). Of course, because defendant is entitled to a credit of either $1,360 or the sum total of the fines, whichever is less (see 725 ILCS 5/110--14(a) (West 2006)), this particular error is of no consequence.”
720 ILCS 550/10.3(a): 2 cases
People v. Johnson, 2015 IL App (3d) 140364. “Drug 720 ILCS 550/10.3(a) Eff. Fine- People v.”
People v. Johnson, 2015 IL App (3d) 140364, 46 N.E.3d 937. “Drug 720 ILCS 550/10.3(a) Eff. 1/1/92 Fine- People v.”
720 ILCS 550/10.3(a)(1): 1 case
People v. Williams, 2013 IL App (4th) 120313, 991 N.E.2d 914. “2(a)(1)/ Cannabis 720 ILCS 550/10.3(a)(1) $3,000 * Cont. Sub.”
720 ILCS 550/10.3(a)(2): 1 case
People v. Williams, 2013 IL App (4th) 120313, 991 N.E.2d 914. “2(a)(1)/ Cannabis 720 ILCS 550/10.3(a)(1) $3,000 * Cont. Sub.”
720 ILCS 550/10.3(a)(3): 1 case
People v. Williams, 2013 IL App (4th) 120313, 991 N.E.2d 914. “2(a)(1)/ Cannabis 720 ILCS 550/10.3(a)(1) $3,000 * Cont. Sub.”
720 ILCS 550/10.3(a)(4): 3 cases
People v. Williams, 2013 IL App (4th) 120313, 991 N.E.2d 914. “2(a)(1)/ Cannabis 720 ILCS 550/10.3(a)(1) $3,000 * Cont. Sub.”
People v. Rhodes, 899 N.E.2d 335 (Ill. App. Ct. 2d Dist. 2008). “See 720 ILCS 550/ 10.3(a)(4) (West 2006). Of course, because defendant is entitled to a credit of either $1,360 or the sum total of the fines, whichever is less (see 725 ILCS 5/110 — 14(a) (West 2006)), this particular error is of no consequence.”
People v. Rhodes, No. 2-07-0619 Rel (Ill. App. Ct. 2d Dist. Nov. 13, 2008). “See 720 ILCS 550/10.3(a)(4) (West 2006). Of course, because defendant is entitled to a credit of either $1,360 or the sum total of the fines, whichever is less (see 725 ILCS 5/110--14(a) (West 2006)), this particular error is of no consequence.”
720 ILCS 550/10.3(a)(5): 1 case
People v. Williams, 2013 IL App (4th) 120313, 991 N.E.2d 914. “2(a)(1)/ Cannabis 720 ILCS 550/10.3(a)(1) $3,000 * Cont. Sub.”
720 ILCS 550/10.3(a)(6): 1 case
People v. Williams, 2013 IL App (4th) 120313, 991 N.E.2d 914. “2(a)(1)/ Cannabis 720 ILCS 550/10.3(a)(1) $3,000 * Cont. Sub.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.