Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 179. LABOR RELATIONS
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 179.52 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, Ex1971 c 33 s 17]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1962–2024 · leading case: Minneapolis Fed'n of Teachers, Local 59 v. Obermeyer, 147 N.W.2d 358 (Minn. 1966).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Minneapolis Fed'n of Teachers, Local 59 v. Obermeyer, 147 N.W.2d 358 (Minn. 1966). · cites it 4× “This order provided definite means of communication between associations of Federal government employees and agency heads, which would make it possible to focus public attention upon the merits of employee claims.”
Finch v. Wemlinger, 310 N.W.2d 66 (Minn. 1981). · cites it 2× “There we interpreted *69 Minn.Stat. § 179.52 (1969), the predecessor to Minn.”
Marshall Cnty. Cent. Educ. Ass'n v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 441, 363 N.W.2d 126 (Minn. Ct. App. 1985). · cites it 2× “The court in Ekstedt adopted a liberal interpretation of the term “grievance,” stating: A liberal and broad construction of the term “grievance” as used in collective bargaining agreements should be given in the interest of encouraging the use of machinery which has been set up…”
Richfield Fed'n of Teachers v. Richfield Educ. Ass'n, 115 N.W.2d 682 (Minn. 1962). · cites it 3× “Under § 179.52, “* * * public employees shall have the right to designate representatives for the purpose of meeting with the governmental agency with respect to grievances and conditions of employment.”
Anoka Cnty., Anoka, Minnesota v. Law Enf't Labor Servs., Inc., Brooklyn Ctr., Minnesota, ... (Minn. 2024). · cites it 2× “Laws 1554 , 1555–56 (codified as amended at Minn. Stat. § 179.52 , subd. 4 (1966)). The amended language provided: In defining the [representation] unit, the labor conciliator shall take into consideration, along with other relevant factors, the principles of efficient…”
Anoka Cnty., Anoka, Minnesota v. Law Enf't Labor Servs., Inc., Brooklyn Ctr., Minnesota (Minn. 2024). · cites it 2× “Laws 1554 , 1555–56 (codified as amended at Minn. Stat. § 179.52 , subd. 4 (1966)). The amended language provided: In defining the [representation] unit, the labor conciliator shall take into consideration, along with other relevant factors, the principles of efficient…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.