Tennessee Code Annotated
Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-4-2001 (2026)
Short title
✓ current as of May 2026
This part shall be known and may be cited as the "Excise Tax Law of 1999."
Acts 1999, ch. 406, § 3.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 2007–2019 · leading case: Vodafone Americas Holdings, Inc. & Subsidiaries v. Richard H. Roberts, Comm'r of Revenue, State of Tennessee, 486 S.W.3d 496 (Tenn. 2016).
Vodafone Americas Holdings, Inc. & Subsidiaries v. Richard H. Roberts, Comm'r of Revenue, State of Tennessee, 486 S.W.3d 496 (Tenn. 2016). “Finally, we consider whether the variance was within the range of acceptable alternative decisions, to determine overall whether the Commissioner‘s imposition of a variance constituted an abuse of his discretion.”
Bellsouth Advert. & Publ'g Corp. v. Chumley, 308 S.W.3d 350 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2009). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 67-4-2001 et seq. 1 pertains to excess tax and Tenn.”
Vodafone Americas Holdings Inc. & Subsidiaries v. Richard H. Roberts, Comm'r of Revenue, State of Tennessee (Tenn. Ct. App. 2014). “, and on their net worth as provided in Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-4-2110 et seq.11 States are given wide latitude under the U.”
Comcast Holdings Corp. v. Tennessee Dep't of Revenue (Tenn. Ct. App. 2019). “Our Supreme Court has explained: Tennessee’s corporate excise tax, Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-4-2001 et seq., and its franchise tax, Tenn.”
Hilloak Realty Co. v. Chumley, 233 S.W.3d 816 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2007). “This changed in 1999, when the General Assembly enacted the Excise Tax Law of 1999 (“the Act”), currently codified at T.C.A. § 67-4-2001(2006), et seq. The Act was a part of the Tax Revision and Reform Act of 1999.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-4-2001(2006) — 1 case
Hilloak Realty Co. v. Chumley, 233 S.W.3d 816 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2007). “This changed in 1999, when the General Assembly enacted the Excise Tax Law of 1999 (“the Act”), currently codified at T.C.A. § 67-4-2001(2006), et seq. The Act was a part of the Tax Revision and Reform Act of 1999.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.