Vt. Stat. Ann. » Title 10 Chapter 151
Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6007 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 001 : GENERAL PROVISIONS

(Cite as: 10 V.S.A. § 6007)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 37 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1992–2026 · leading case: In re Request for Jurisdictional Opinion re: Changes in Physical Structure & Use at Burlington Int'l Airport for F-35A, 2015 VT 41 (Vt. 2015).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In re Request for Jurisdictional Opinion re: Changes in Physical Structure & Use at Burlington Int'l Airport for F-35A, 2015 VT 41 (Vt. 2015). · cites it 4× “See 10 V.S.A. § 6007(c) (allowing “any person” to request a jurisdictional opinion from the district coordinator concerning the applicability of Act 250 to activity that might constitute development).”
In re Mountain Top Inn & Resort, JO 1-391 (Katherine Hall, Appellant), 2020 VT 57 (Vt. 2020). · cites it 2× “, the issuance of a binding jurisdictional opinion pursuant to 10 V.S.A. § 6007. Because this case does not involve an appeal of an NRB rulemaking decision, the jurisdictional limitations in § 8503(e) do not apply.”
Jipac, Nv v. Silas, 800 A.2d 1092 (Vt. 2002). · cites it 5× “See 10 V.S.A. § 6007(a) (before subdividing land, seller shall prepare Act 250 disclosure statement that must be provided to buyer within ten days of entering into purchase and sales agreement).”
In Re Vermont Verde Antique Int'l, Inc., 811 A.2d 181 (Vt. 2002). · cites it 4× “See Envionmental Board Rule 3(c) (“In addition, district coordinators may issue Jurisdictional Opinions when, in their judgment, the applicability of Act 250, these rules or an order of the board needs to be determined”).”
In Re Shenandoah LLC, 2011 VT 68 (Vt. 2011). · cites it 2× “See 10 V.S.A. § 6007(c). He also asked for clarification of "[t]he current total subdivision and housing unit counts for the owners and manager of Shenandoah, LLC, for Act 250 jurisdictional purposes" and "[w]hat the total housing unit counts for the owners and manager of…”
In re North East Materials Grp., LLC/Rock of Ages Corp. Act 250 Permit (Russell Austin, Pamela Austin, Julie Barre, Marc Bernier, Collectively, Neighbors for Healthy Communities, Appellants), 2019 VT 55 (Vt. 2019). “NEMG’s application because the proposed operation does not comply with either Act 250 Criterion 1, with respect to air pollution due to silica dust, or Criterion 8, with respect to noise from off-site truck traffic.”
Nat. Resources Bd. Land Use Panel v. Dorr, MGC, Inc., & Dorr Oil Co., 2015 VT 1 (Vt. 2015). “” Respondents neither appealed the jurisdictional opinion to the Environmental Division, as authorized by 10 V.S.A. § 6007(d)(4), applied for a permit amendment, nor abated the gravel extraction activities on the project tract.”
In re Merritt, 2003 VT 84 (Vt. 2003). “The district environmental commission denied plaintiffs’ motion to dismiss, explaining that the proper avenue for obtaining a jurisdictional opinion was through the district coordinator pursuant to 10 V.S.A. § 6007(c). Also in March, the district coordinator issued a third…”
In re Snowstone, LLC Act 250 Jurisdictional Opinion (Michael Harrington, Appellants), 2021 VT 72 (Vt. 2022). “See 10 V.S.A. § 6007(c) (authorizing jurisdictional opinions).”
In re Catamount Slate, Inc., 2004 VT 14 (Vt. 2004). · cites it 5× “The central question presented is whether a district coordinator and the environmental board may reopen a final determination issued pursuant to 10 V.S.A. § 6007(c) on a slate quarry’s exempt status under Act 250 at the request of neighbors who were not notified of and served…”
In re North East Materials Grp. LLC ACT 250 JO 5-21 (Russell Austin, Pamela Austin, Julie Barre, Marc Bernier, Appellants), 2015 VT 79 (Vt. 2015). “past applications of the test, we conclude that the question of whether a proposed development falls within a preexisting development is a more general question; whether the specific parameters of a proposed post-1970 development are consistent with the scope of an established…”
Robitaille v. Rubin, 615 A.2d 1025 (Vt. 1992). “The Legislature created a rescission remedy in only one section of Act 250,10 V.S.A. § 6007. While this section does not apply to the instant case, it illustrates that the Legislature knew how to provide for a rescission remedy if it chose to do so.”
Show all 37 citing cases →
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6007(C) — 1 case
Dover Valley Trail JO 2-233 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2007).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6007(a) — 2 cases
Jipac, Nv v. Silas, 800 A.2d 1092 (Vt. 2002). “See 10 V.S.A. § 6007(a) (before subdividing land, seller shall prepare Act 250 disclosure statement that must be provided to buyer within ten days of entering into purchase and sales agreement).”
Shenandoah LLC JO (Vt. Super. Ct. 2009).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6007(a)(2) — 1 case
Jipac, Nv v. Silas, 800 A.2d 1092 (Vt. 2002). “See 10 V.S.A. § 6007(a) (before subdividing land, seller shall prepare Act 250 disclosure statement that must be provided to buyer within ten days of entering into purchase and sales agreement).”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6007(c) — 30 cases
In Re Vermont Verde Antique Int'l, Inc., 811 A.2d 181 (Vt. 2002). “See Envionmental Board Rule 3(c) (“In addition, district coordinators may issue Jurisdictional Opinions when, in their judgment, the applicability of Act 250, these rules or an order of the board needs to be determined”).”
In re Request for Jurisdictional Opinion re: Changes in Physical Structure & Use at Burlington Int'l Airport for F-35A, 2015 VT 41 (Vt. 2015). “See 10 V.S.A. § 6007(c) (allowing “any person” to request a jurisdictional opinion from the district coordinator concerning the applicability of Act 250 to activity that might constitute development).”
In re Mountain Top Inn & Resort, JO 1-391 (Katherine Hall, Appellant), 2020 VT 57 (Vt. 2020). “, the issuance of a binding jurisdictional opinion pursuant to 10 V.S.A. § 6007. Because this case does not involve an appeal of an NRB rulemaking decision, the jurisdictional limitations in § 8503(e) do not apply.”
In Re Shenandoah LLC, 2011 VT 68 (Vt. 2011). “See 10 V.S.A. § 6007(c). He also asked for clarification of "[t]he current total subdivision and housing unit counts for the owners and manager of Shenandoah, LLC, for Act 250 jurisdictional purposes" and "[w]hat the total housing unit counts for the owners and manager of…”
In re North East Materials Grp., LLC/Rock of Ages Corp. Act 250 Permit (Russell Austin, Pamela Austin, Julie Barre, Marc Bernier, Collectively, Neighbors for Healthy Communities, Appellants), 2019 VT 55 (Vt. 2019). “NEMG’s application because the proposed operation does not comply with either Act 250 Criterion 1, with respect to air pollution due to silica dust, or Criterion 8, with respect to noise from off-site truck traffic.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6007(d) — 1 case
WhistlePig, LLC Act 250 JO (Vt. Super. Ct. 2014).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6007(d)(4) — 5 cases
In re Request for Jurisdictional Opinion re: Changes in Physical Structure & Use at Burlington Int'l Airport for F-35A, 2015 VT 41 (Vt. 2015). “See 10 V.S.A. § 6007(c) (allowing “any person” to request a jurisdictional opinion from the district coordinator concerning the applicability of Act 250 to activity that might constitute development).”
Nat. Resources Bd. Land Use Panel v. Dorr, MGC, Inc., & Dorr Oil Co., 2015 VT 1 (Vt. 2015). “” Respondents neither appealed the jurisdictional opinion to the Environmental Division, as authorized by 10 V.S.A. § 6007(d)(4), applied for a permit amendment, nor abated the gravel extraction activities on the project tract.”
In re North East Materials Grp. LLC ACT 250 JO 5-21 (Russell Austin, Pamela Austin, Julie Barre, Marc Bernier, Appellants), 2015 VT 79 (Vt. 2015). “past applications of the test, we conclude that the question of whether a proposed development falls within a preexisting development is a more general question; whether the specific parameters of a proposed post-1970 development are consistent with the scope of an established…”
In re North East Materials Grp. LLC Act 250 JO 5-21, 199 Vt. 577 (Vt. 2015).
In re Request for Jurisdictional Opinion re: Changes in Physical Structure & Use at Burlington Int'l Airport for F-35A (Vt. 2015).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.