Vt. Stat. Ann. » Title 10 Chapter 151
Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6025 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 002 : ADMINISTRATION

(Cite as: 10 V.S.A. § 6025)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 21 cases, 1975–2020 · leading case: In re Spencer, 566 A.2d 959 (Vt. 1989).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In Re Agency of Admin., Etc., 444 A.2d 1349 (Vt. 1982). · cites it 2× “Under the Board’s rule, a demolition project which is unconnected to any plan of development for the site, being a modification of land use, comes within the broad definition of “construction of improvements” and, when it occurs on a tract or tracts of land involving more than…”
In re Spencer, 566 A.2d 959 (Vt. 1989). · cites it 3× “On appeal, the applicants challenge the assertion of Act 250 jurisdiction over the project, arguing that Environmental Board Rule 2(A)(6), otherwise known as the “road rule,” is void as exceeding the bounds of the enabling legislation under which it was adopted, 10 V.S.A. §…”
Jipac, Nv v. Silas, 800 A.2d 1092 (Vt. 2002). · cites it 3× “See 10 V.S.A. § 6025(c) (requiring innocent purchaser rule).”
In re Korrow Real Est., LLC Act 250 Permit Amendment Application (State of Vermont, Appellant), 187 A.3d 1125 (Vt. 2018). “10 V.S.A. § 6025(b) ("The Board may adopt substantive rules .”
In Re Appeal of S-S Corp./Rooney Hous. Developments, 2006 VT 8 (Vt. 2006). · cites it 2× “10 V.S.A. § 6025. As we have noted, some Board determinations are inherently fact-based and do not easily fall within "inflexible definitions.”
Comm. to Save the Bishop's House, Inc. v. Med. Ctr. Hosp. of Vermont, Inc., 400 A.2d 1015 (Vt. 1979). “At the time this rule was promulgated, the Environmental Board was required by 10 V.S.A. § 6025 to adopt rules to “carry out the provisions of this chapter.”
In Re Wildlife Wonderland, Inc., 346 A.2d 645 (Vt. 1975). · cites it 2× “This conclusion must be stricken on jurisdictional grounds because it does not comport with procedure promulgated by the Environmental Board itself under its rule-making power granted by 10 V.S.A. § 6025. Rule 13(C)(5), 1 Administrative Procedures Compilation, p.”
In re Mathez Act 250 LU Permit (Sung-Hee Chung, Appellant), 192 A.3d 400 (Vt. 2018). “§ 6025(b)(3) (authorizing Natural Resources Board to create procedures for District Commission to approve Act 250 permits); Act 250 Rules, Rule 30 (directing District Commission to approve, approve with conditions, or deny permit applications); Act 250 Rules, Rule 31 (allowing…”
In Re Baptist Fellowship of Randolph, Inc., 481 A.2d 1274 (Vt. 1984). “) Pursuant to- 10 V.S.A. § 6025, the State has adopted certain rules to assist in the interpretation and administration of Act 250.”
Sunset Cliff Homeowners Ass'n v. Water Resources Bd., 2008 VT 84 (Vt. 2008). “See 10 V.S.A. § 6025(d)(5) (2006). The new statutes were not in effect during the proceedings before the WRB or the superior court in this case, and thus have no impact on our decision.”
Vermont Nat'l Tel. Co. v. Dep't of Taxes, 2020 VT 83 (Vt. 2020). “, 10 V.S.A. § 6025(b) (providing Natural Resource Board with authority to “adopt substantive rules .”
Guite' Act 250 JO (Vt. Super. Ct. 2009). · cites it 2× “Rather, it is the Natural Resources Board that is authorized to adopt rules of procedure for the District Commissions, 10 V.S.A. § 6025(a), and it is the Land Use Panel that is authorized to adopt substantive rules in relation to Act 250.”
Show all 21 citing cases →
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6025(a) — 4 cases
In re Spencer, 566 A.2d 959 (Vt. 1989). “On appeal, the applicants challenge the assertion of Act 250 jurisdiction over the project, arguing that Environmental Board Rule 2(A)(6), otherwise known as the “road rule,” is void as exceeding the bounds of the enabling legislation under which it was adopted, 10 V.S.A. §…”
Baldwin Prop. Act 250 JO (Vt. Super. Ct. 2010).
Guite' Act 250 JO (Vt. Super. Ct. 2009). “Rather, it is the Natural Resources Board that is authorized to adopt rules of procedure for the District Commissions, 10 V.S.A. § 6025(a), and it is the Land Use Panel that is authorized to adopt substantive rules in relation to Act 250.”
Lefgren Act 250 JO Appeal (Vt. Super. Ct. 2008).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6025(b) — 6 cases
In re Korrow Real Est., LLC Act 250 Permit Amendment Application (State of Vermont, Appellant), 187 A.3d 1125 (Vt. 2018). “10 V.S.A. § 6025(b) ("The Board may adopt substantive rules .”
Vermont Nat'l Tel. Co. v. Dep't of Taxes, 2020 VT 83 (Vt. 2020). “, 10 V.S.A. § 6025(b) (providing Natural Resource Board with authority to “adopt substantive rules .”
Lake Champlain Bluegrass Festival JO (Vt. Super. Ct. 2012).
Carson Act 250 JO (Vt. Super. Ct. 2009).
RCC Atl., Inc. & Sousa Appeal of Jones Leinoff (Vt. Super. Ct. 2009).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6025(b)(3) — 1 case
In re Mathez Act 250 LU Permit (Sung-Hee Chung, Appellant), 192 A.3d 400 (Vt. 2018). “§ 6025(b)(3) (authorizing Natural Resources Board to create procedures for District Commission to approve Act 250 permits); Act 250 Rules, Rule 30 (directing District Commission to approve, approve with conditions, or deny permit applications); Act 250 Rules, Rule 31 (allowing…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6025(c) — 1 case
Jipac, Nv v. Silas, 800 A.2d 1092 (Vt. 2002). “See 10 V.S.A. § 6025(c) (requiring innocent purchaser rule).”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6025(c)(2) — 1 case
Jipac, Nv v. Silas, 800 A.2d 1092 (Vt. 2002). “See 10 V.S.A. § 6025(c) (requiring innocent purchaser rule).”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6025(d)(5) — 3 cases
Sunset Cliff Homeowners Ass'n v. Water Resources Bd., 2008 VT 84 (Vt. 2008). “See 10 V.S.A. § 6025(d)(5) (2006). The new statutes were not in effect during the proceedings before the WRB or the superior court in this case, and thus have no impact on our decision.”
Hinesburg Hannaford Wetland (Vt. Super. Ct. 2016).
Bibby 5-Lot Final Plat subdivision (Vt. Super. Ct. 2012).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.