Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Kansas opinions name it 2 courts 1941–1993 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Ray v. Schneider
green
2 sentences1993The court recognized the general rule that an employer of an independent contractor, absent an act of negligence on his own part, is not liable to others for the negligent acts of the independent contractor. 16 Conn. App. at 663 . 1993However, where the employer has a nondelegable duty to take safety precautions imposed by statute or regulation, the employer may be vicariously liable to others for the negligent acts of the independent contractor. 16 Conn. App. at 664 . | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Fund v. Helme
green
1 sentence1993The court recognized the general rule that “the number of causative acts, and not the number of injuries produced, determines the number of ‘occurrences.’ ” 153 Ariz. at 135 . | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Mottet v. Stafford
neutral
2 sentences1971In Mottet v. Stafford, 94 Wash. 572 , 162 Pac. 1001 , the court recognized the general rule and the soundness thereof in the absence of countervailing statutes, but pointed out that the applicable Washington statute (Rem. 1971In Mottet v. Stafford, 94 Wash. 572 , 162 Pac. 1001 , the court recognized the general rule and the soundness thereof in the absence of countervailing statutes, but pointed out that the applicable Washington statute (Rem. | 1 | 1971–1971 |
Payne v. Rome Coca-Cola Bottling Co.
green
2 sentences1941Corp., 342 Mo. 912 , 119 S. W. 2d 240 ; Stolle v. Anheuser-Busch, 307 Mo. 520 , 271 S. W. 497 ; Payne v. Rome Coca-Cola Co., 10 Ga. App. 762 , 73 S. E. 1087 ; Macon Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Crane, 55 Ga. App. 573 , 190 S. E. 879 ; Lanza v. De Ridder Coca-Cola Bottling Co. (La. 1941Corp., 342 Mo. 912 , 119 S. W. 2d 240 ; Stolle v. Anheuser-Busch, 307 Mo. 520 , 271 S. W. 497 ; Payne v. Rome Coca-Cola Co., 10 Ga. App. 762 , 73 S. E. 1087 ; Macon Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Crane, 55 Ga. App. 573 , 190 S. E. 879 ; Lanza v. De Ridder Coca-Cola Bottling Co. (La. | 1 | 1941–1941 |
Macon Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Crane
green
2 sentences1941Corp., 342 Mo. 912 , 119 S. W. 2d 240 ; Stolle v. Anheuser-Busch, 307 Mo. 520 , 271 S. W. 497 ; Payne v. Rome Coca-Cola Co., 10 Ga. App. 762 , 73 S. E. 1087 ; Macon Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Crane, 55 Ga. App. 573 , 190 S. E. 879 ; Lanza v. De Ridder Coca-Cola Bottling Co. (La. 1941Corp., 342 Mo. 912 , 119 S. W. 2d 240 ; Stolle v. Anheuser-Busch, 307 Mo. 520 , 271 S. W. 497 ; Payne v. Rome Coca-Cola Co., 10 Ga. App. 762 , 73 S. E. 1087 ; Macon Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Crane, 55 Ga. App. 573 , 190 S. E. 879 ; Lanza v. De Ridder Coca-Cola Bottling Co. (La. | 1 | 1941–1941 |
Goldman & Freiman Bottling Co. v. Sindell
green
1 sentence1941In sustaining a judgment for plaintiff against the manufacturer and distributor of the beverage the court recognized the general rule that in the application of the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur the evidence must show the thing causing the injury was under the control of defendant at the time, but held: “The application of the res ipsa loquitur doctrine is not limited to cases where the injurious agency is in the control of the defendant at the time of the injury, but it is sufficient if it appears that such agency was in defendant’s control at the time of the negligent act which caused the in | 1 | 1941–1941 |
Stolle v. Anheuser-Busch Inc.
green
2 sentences1941Corp., 342 Mo. 912 , 119 S. W. 2d 240 ; Stolle v. Anheuser-Busch, 307 Mo. 520 , 271 S. W. 497 ; Payne v. Rome Coca-Cola Co., 10 Ga. App. 762 , 73 S. E. 1087 ; Macon Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Crane, 55 Ga. App. 573 , 190 S. E. 879 ; Lanza v. De Ridder Coca-Cola Bottling Co. (La. 1941Corp., 342 Mo. 912 , 119 S. W. 2d 240 ; Stolle v. Anheuser-Busch, 307 Mo. 520 , 271 S. W. 497 ; Payne v. Rome Coca-Cola Co., 10 Ga. App. 762 , 73 S. E. 1087 ; Macon Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Crane, 55 Ga. App. 573 , 190 S. E. 879 ; Lanza v. De Ridder Coca-Cola Bottling Co. (La. | 1 | 1941–1941 |
Tayer v. York Ice MacHinery Corp.
green
2 sentences1941Corp., 342 Mo. 912 , 119 S. W. 2d 240 ; Stolle v. Anheuser-Busch, 307 Mo. 520 , 271 S. W. 497 ; Payne v. Rome Coca-Cola Co., 10 Ga. App. 762 , 73 S. E. 1087 ; Macon Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Crane, 55 Ga. App. 573 , 190 S. E. 879 ; Lanza v. De Ridder Coca-Cola Bottling Co. (La. 1941Corp., 342 Mo. 912 , 119 S. W. 2d 240 ; Stolle v. Anheuser-Busch, 307 Mo. 520 , 271 S. W. 497 ; Payne v. Rome Coca-Cola Co., 10 Ga. App. 762 , 73 S. E. 1087 ; Macon Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Crane, 55 Ga. App. 573 , 190 S. E. 879 ; Lanza v. De Ridder Coca-Cola Bottling Co. (La. | 1 | 1941–1941 |
Bradford v. People
neutral
1 sentence1941In Bradford v. The People, 22 Colo. 157 , 43 Pac. 1013 , the court recognized the general rule to be as above stated, but was unable to apply it because of a state statute (Mills Annotated Statutes, § 3459) which provided that the term of one sentenced to the penitentiary shall be computed from and including the day on which he is received into the penitentiary. | 1 | 1941–1941 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.