Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Tennessee opinions name it 3 courts 1915–2006 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Tennessee courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Snowball v. Stategreen2 sentences1975In Snowball v. State, Tenn.Cr.App., 477 S.W.2d 240, 244 (1971), this Court recognized the general rule that evidence of other crimes are generally inadmissible but then reviewed the instances where there is an exception to the general rule. 1975In Snowball v. State, Tenn.Cr.App., 477 S.W.2d 240, 244 (1971), this Court recognized the general rule that evidence of other crimes are generally inadmissible but then reviewed the instances where there is an exception to the general rule. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Potter v. Tucker
green
1 sentence2006Pryor, 1998 Tenn. App. LEXIS at *4 (citing Potter v. Tucker, 688 S.W.2d 833 (Tenn. App. 1985)). | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Travelers Insurance Co. v. Williams
green
1 sentence1990Co. v. Williams, the court recognized the general rule that the common fund doctrine is not applied against *810 those who have, employed counsel of their own choosing to represent their interests. 541 S.W.2d at 590 . | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Cornelius H. Doherty v. David G. Bress
green
1 sentence1990In recent years the courts have created an exception to this general rule where the contribution of the original or lead attorneys and the attorneys hired by the “stranger” beneficiaries are unequal.' See Doherty v. Bress, 262 F.2d 20 (D.C.Cir.1958), cert. den. 359 U.S. 934 , 79 S.Ct. 649 , 3 L.Ed.2d 636 (1959); Dawson, Lawyers and Involuntary Clients: Attorney Fees from Funds, 87 Harv.L.Rev. 1597 (1974). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Adams v. United States
green
1 sentence1990In recent years the courts have created an exception to this general rule where the contribution of the original or lead attorneys and the attorneys hired by the “stranger” beneficiaries are unequal.' See Doherty v. Bress, 262 F.2d 20 (D.C.Cir.1958), cert. den. 359 U.S. 934 , 79 S.Ct. 649 , 3 L.Ed.2d 636 (1959); Dawson, Lawyers and Involuntary Clients: Attorney Fees from Funds, 87 Harv.L.Rev. 1597 (1974). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Zipp v. Commissioner
green
1 sentence1990In recent years the courts have created an exception to this general rule where the contribution of the original or lead attorneys and the attorneys hired by the “stranger” beneficiaries are unequal.' See Doherty v. Bress, 262 F.2d 20 (D.C.Cir.1958), cert. den. 359 U.S. 934 , 79 S.Ct. 649 , 3 L.Ed.2d 636 (1959); Dawson, Lawyers and Involuntary Clients: Attorney Fees from Funds, 87 Harv.L.Rev. 1597 (1974). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Beachview Broadcasting Corp. v. Federal Communications Commission
green
1 sentence1990In recent years the courts have created an exception to this general rule where the contribution of the original or lead attorneys and the attorneys hired by the “stranger” beneficiaries are unequal.' See Doherty v. Bress, 262 F.2d 20 (D.C.Cir.1958), cert. den. 359 U.S. 934 , 79 S.Ct. 649 , 3 L.Ed.2d 636 (1959); Dawson, Lawyers and Involuntary Clients: Attorney Fees from Funds, 87 Harv.L.Rev. 1597 (1974). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
McCanless, Com'r v. Klein
green
2 sentences1951In McCanless, Commissioner v. Klein, 182 Tenn. 631, 637 , 188 S. W. (2d) 745, 747 , this Court recognized the general rule to be “that cases which pending litiga tion or appeal liave become moot will be dismissed as such”. 1951In McCanless, Commissioner v. Klein, 182 Tenn. 631, 637 , 188 S. W. (2d) 745, 747 , this Court recognized the general rule to be “that cases which pending litiga tion or appeal liave become moot will be dismissed as such”. | 1 | 1951–1951 |
Chicago Railway Equipment Co. v. Merchants' Bank
green
2 sentences1915The exact question before us came before the supreme court of the' United States. 'While that case did not arise under the negotiable instruments statute, the court recognized the general rule of the law merchant to be that: “To constitute a valid promissory note it must be for tbe payment of money at some fixed time, or upon some event which must inevitably happen, and that its character as a promissory note cannot depend upon future events but solely upon its character when created.” The court further recognized the negotiability of a note payable on or before a named date, and after a revie 1915The exact question before us came before the supreme court of the' United States. 'While that case did not arise under the negotiable instruments statute, the court recognized the general rule of the law merchant to be that: “To constitute a valid promissory note it must be for tbe payment of money at some fixed time, or upon some event which must inevitably happen, and that its character as a promissory note cannot depend upon future events but solely upon its character when created.” The court further recognized the negotiability of a note payable on or before a named date, and after a revie | 1 | 1915–1915 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.