5 Utah opinions name it 2 courts 1980–1989 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Utah courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Utah. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Utah. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Frye v. United States
red
2 sentences1987In Phillips, we stated: Frye held that scientific tests still in the experimental stages should not be admitted in evidence, but that scientific testimony deduced from a "well-recognized scientific principle or discovery" is admissible if the scientific principle from which the deduction is made is "sufficiently established to have gained general acceptance *1347 in the particular field in which it belongs." Phillips, 615 P.2d at 1233 (quoting Frye, 293 F. at 1014 ). 1987In Phillips, we stated: Frye held that scientific tests still in the experimental stages should not be admitted in evidence, but that scientific testimony deduced from a “well-recognized scientific principle or discovery” is admissible if the scientific principle from which the deduction is made is “sufficiently established to have gained general accept- anee in the particular field in which it belongs.” Phillips, 615 P.2d at 1233 (quoting Frye, 293 F. at 1014 ). | 3 | 1980–1987 |
PHILLIPS BY & THROUGH UTAH, ETC. v. Jackson
green
2 sentences1987In Phillips, we stated: Frye held that scientific tests still in the experimental stages should not be admitted in evidence, but that scientific testimony deduced from a "well-recognized scientific principle or discovery" is admissible if the scientific principle from which the deduction is made is "sufficiently established to have gained general acceptance *1347 in the particular field in which it belongs." Phillips, 615 P.2d at 1233 (quoting Frye, 293 F. at 1014 ). 1987In Phillips, we stated: Frye held that scientific tests still in the experimental stages should not be admitted in evidence, but that scientific testimony deduced from a “well-recognized scientific principle or discovery” is admissible if the scientific principle from which the deduction is made is “sufficiently established to have gained general accept- anee in the particular field in which it belongs.” Phillips, 615 P.2d at 1233 (quoting Frye, 293 F. at 1014 ). | 2 | 1987–1987 |
Kofford Ex Rel. Utah State Department of Social Services v. Flora
green
2 sentences1989Once a scientific principle or test has achieved sufficient reliability that “judicial notice of that fact may be taken, ... foundational evidence as to the validity of the basic principles may be dispensed with in th[e] jurisdiction in the future.” Kofford, 744 P.2d at 1348 . 1989Once a scientific principle or test has achieved sufficient reliability that "judicial notice of that fact may be taken, ... foundational evidence as to the validity of the basic principles may be dispensed with in th[e] jurisdiction in the future." Kofford, 744 P.2d at 1348 . | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.