Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Virgin Islands opinions name it 2 courts 2005–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Virgin Islands courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Goral v. Stategreen1 sentence2026See Gratz v. State, 84 So.3d 1219, 1222 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012) (holding four business days insufficient time for counsel to prepare for a criminal contempt hearing); Goral v. State, 553 So.2d 1282, 1283 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989) (“[T]he defendant received only two actual working days notice of the contempt hearing and was therefore not afforded a reasonable time for preparation of his defense.”). | 1 | 1 |
Gratz v. Stategreen1 sentence2026See Gratz v. State, 84 So.3d 1219, 1222 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012) (holding four business days insufficient time for counsel to prepare for a criminal contempt hearing); Goral v. State, 553 So.2d 1282, 1283 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989) (“[T]he defendant received only two actual working days notice of the contempt hearing and was therefore not afforded a reasonable time for preparation of his defense.”). | 1 | 1 |
United States v. United Mine Workers of Americagreen2 sentences2011See Najawicz, 52 V.I. at 340 n.19 (“[A] civil contempt order may not issue if it is based upon a court order that... was beyond the jurisdiction of the court.”) (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting United States v. United Mine Workers, 330 U.S. 258, 294-95 , 67 S. Ct. 677, 696-97 , 91 L. 2011See Najawicz, 52 V.I. at 340 n.19 (“[A] civil contempt order may not issue if it is based upon a court order that... was beyond the jurisdiction of the court.”) (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting United States v. United Mine Workers, 330 U.S. 258, 294-95 , 67 S. Ct. 677, 696-97 , 91 L. | 1 | 1 |
In re Najawiczgreen1 sentence2011See Najawicz, 52 V.I. at 340 n.19 (“[A] civil contempt order may not issue if it is based upon a court order that... was beyond the jurisdiction of the court.”) (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting United States v. United Mine Workers, 330 U.S. 258, 294-95 , 67 S. Ct. 677, 696-97 , 91 L. | 1 | 1 |
Nilva v. United Statesgreen2 sentences2010See, e.g., In re Puerto Rico Newspaper Guild Local 225, 476 F.2d 856, 859 (1st Cir. 1973) (“Rule 42(b)... disqualifies a judge from presiding over a contempt hearing where ‘the contempt charged involves disrespect to or criticism of [that] judge,’ but disobedience of a court order has been held not to fall within this category.”) (citing Nilva v. United States, 352 U.S. 385, 395-96 , 77 S. Ct. 431 , 1 L. 2010See, e.g., In re Puerto Rico Newspaper Guild Local 225, 476 F.2d 856, 859 (1st Cir. 1973) (“Rule 42(b)... disqualifies a judge from presiding over a contempt hearing where ‘the contempt charged involves disrespect to or criticism of [that] judge,’ but disobedience of a court order has been held not to fall within this category.”) (citing Nilva v. United States, 352 U.S. 385, 395-96 , 77 S. Ct. 431 , 1 L. | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Clement v. Conole, Charles E. Anable, Richard C. Conole, Bridwell W. Lincoln, William J. Callahan and Alva M. Meyersgreen1 sentence2010Ed. 2d 415 (1957)); United States v. Conole, 365 F.2d 306, 308 (3d Cir. 1966) (“The appellants contend that since the trial judge initiated the proceedings he was disqualified to summarily hear the matter on the merits. | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Wechtgreen1 sentence2007See id:, Wecht, 484 F.3d at 219 (scheduling of a contempt hearing was not immediately appealable, but counsel could appeal any adverse future contempt rulings); 15B CHARLES Alan WRIGHT & ARTHUR R. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
cluster 310225green1 sentence2010See, e.g., In re Puerto Rico Newspaper Guild Local 225, 476 F.2d 856, 859 (1st Cir. 1973) (“Rule 42(b)... disqualifies a judge from presiding over a contempt hearing where ‘the contempt charged involves disrespect to or criticism of [that] judge,’ but disobedience of a court order has been held not to fall within this category.”) (citing Nilva v. United States, 352 U.S. 385, 395-96 , 77 S. Ct. 431 , 1 L. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Koubriti
green
1 sentence2005The most comparable case cited by the Government, U.S. v. Koubriti, 305 F. Supp. 2d 723 (E.D. | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.