37 Mississippi opinions name it 2 courts 1953–2023 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Mississippi courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Holloman v. Stategreen2 sentences2006Holloman v. State, 656 So.2d 1134, 1141 (Miss.1995). 2006Holloman v. State, 656 So.2d 1134, 1141 (Miss. 1995). | 4 | 4 |
Lockett v. Stategreen2 sentences2001Id. (citing Lockett v. State, 517 So.2d 1346, 1350 (Miss.1987)). "`Great deference' has been defined in the Batson context as insulating from appellate reversal any trial findings which are not clearly erroneous." Lockett v. State, 517 So.2d at 1349 -50 (citing United States v. Mathews, 803 F.2d 325 (7th Cir.1986)). 2001Id. (citing Lockett v. State, 517 So.2d 1346, 1350 (Miss.1987)). "`Great deference' has been defined in the Batson context as insulating from appellate reversal any trial findings which are not clearly erroneous." Lockett v. State, 517 So.2d at 1349 -50 (citing United States v. Mathews, 803 F.2d 325 (7th Cir.1986)). | 4 | 4 |
Stromas v. Stategreen2 sentences1999See Stromas, 618 So.2d at 122-23 (Miss.1993); Wallace, 607 So.2d at 1188 ; Fleming v. State, 604 So.2d 280, 302-03 (Miss.1992); Jones v. State, 523 So.2d 957, 961 (Miss.1988); Clowers v. State, 522 So.2d 762, 764 (Miss.1988); Presley v. State, 474 So.2d 612, 618-19 (Miss.1985). ¶ 37. 1997See Stromas, 618 So. 2d at 122-23 (Miss. 1993); Wallace, 607 So. 2d at 1188 ; Fleming v. State, 604 So. 2d 280, 302-03 (Miss. 1992); Jones v. State, 523 So. 2d 957, 961 (Miss. 1988); Clowers v. State, 522 So. 2d 762, 764 (Miss. 1988); Presley v. State, 474 So. 2d 612, 618-19 (Miss. 1985). ¶37. | 3 | 3 |
Cole v. Stategreen2 sentences1999Ford also cites to Cole v. State, 217 Miss. 779, 785 , 65 So.2d 262, 264 (1953), which says, "This Court has adopted a rule that a defendant can be convicted on the uncorroborated testimony of an accomplice, but it has carefully restricted the scope of that doctrine by holding that such uncorroborated testimony should be viewed with great caution and suspicion, and that it must be reasonable and not improbable or self-contradictory, or substantially impeached." ¶ 14. 1999Ford also cites to Cole v. State, 217 Miss. 779, 785 , 65 So.2d 262, 264 (1953), which says, "This Court has adopted a rule that a defendant can be convicted on the uncorroborated testimony of an accomplice, but it has carefully restricted the scope of that doctrine by holding that such uncorroborated testimony should be viewed with great caution and suspicion, and that it must be reasonable and not improbable or self-contradictory, or substantially impeached." ¶ 14. | 2 | 6 |
Kolberg v. Stategreen2 sentences2002"Realizing the importance of credibility and first-hand observation, this Court has adopted a standard of review for Batson claims that accords `great deference' to a trial judge's factual findings, reversing only where the finding of the lower court was clearly erroneous or against the overwhelming weight of the evidence." Kolberg I, 704 So.2d at 1312 . 2001In Kolberg v. State, 704 So.2d 1307, 1312 (Miss.1997), we held: Realizing the importance of credibility and first-hand observation, this Court has adopted a standard of review for Batson claims that accords "great deference" to a trial judge's factual findings, reversing only where the finding of the lower court was clearly erroneous or against the overwhelming weight of the evidence. | 2 | 4 |
Presley v. Stategreen2 sentences1999See Stromas, 618 So.2d at 122-23 (Miss.1993); Wallace, 607 So.2d at 1188 ; Fleming v. State, 604 So.2d 280, 302-03 (Miss.1992); Jones v. State, 523 So.2d 957, 961 (Miss.1988); Clowers v. State, 522 So.2d 762, 764 (Miss.1988); Presley v. State, 474 So.2d 612, 618-19 (Miss.1985). ¶ 37. 1997See Stromas, 618 So. 2d at 122-23 (Miss. 1993); Wallace, 607 So. 2d at 1188 ; Fleming v. State, 604 So. 2d 280, 302-03 (Miss. 1992); Jones v. State, 523 So. 2d 957, 961 (Miss. 1988); Clowers v. State, 522 So. 2d 762, 764 (Miss. 1988); Presley v. State, 474 So. 2d 612, 618-19 (Miss. 1985). ¶37. | 2 | 2 |
Clowers v. Stategreen2 sentences1999See Stromas, 618 So.2d at 122-23 (Miss.1993); Wallace, 607 So.2d at 1188 ; Fleming v. State, 604 So.2d 280, 302-03 (Miss.1992); Jones v. State, 523 So.2d 957, 961 (Miss.1988); Clowers v. State, 522 So.2d 762, 764 (Miss.1988); Presley v. State, 474 So.2d 612, 618-19 (Miss.1985). ¶ 37. 1997See Stromas, 618 So. 2d at 122-23 (Miss. 1993); Wallace, 607 So. 2d at 1188 ; Fleming v. State, 604 So. 2d 280, 302-03 (Miss. 1992); Jones v. State, 523 So. 2d 957, 961 (Miss. 1988); Clowers v. State, 522 So. 2d 762, 764 (Miss. 1988); Presley v. State, 474 So. 2d 612, 618-19 (Miss. 1985). ¶37. | 2 | 2 |
Fleming v. Stategreen2 sentences1999See Stromas, 618 So.2d at 122-23 (Miss.1993); Wallace, 607 So.2d at 1188 ; Fleming v. State, 604 So.2d 280, 302-03 (Miss.1992); Jones v. State, 523 So.2d 957, 961 (Miss.1988); Clowers v. State, 522 So.2d 762, 764 (Miss.1988); Presley v. State, 474 So.2d 612, 618-19 (Miss.1985). ¶ 37. 1997See Stromas, 618 So. 2d at 122-23 (Miss. 1993); Wallace, 607 So. 2d at 1188 ; Fleming v. State, 604 So. 2d 280, 302-03 (Miss. 1992); Jones v. State, 523 So. 2d 957, 961 (Miss. 1988); Clowers v. State, 522 So. 2d 762, 764 (Miss. 1988); Presley v. State, 474 So. 2d 612, 618-19 (Miss. 1985). ¶37. | 2 | 2 |
Jones v. Stategreen2 sentences1999See Stromas, 618 So.2d at 122-23 (Miss.1993); Wallace, 607 So.2d at 1188 ; Fleming v. State, 604 So.2d 280, 302-03 (Miss.1992); Jones v. State, 523 So.2d 957, 961 (Miss.1988); Clowers v. State, 522 So.2d 762, 764 (Miss.1988); Presley v. State, 474 So.2d 612, 618-19 (Miss.1985). ¶ 37. 1997See Stromas, 618 So. 2d at 122-23 (Miss. 1993); Wallace, 607 So. 2d at 1188 ; Fleming v. State, 604 So. 2d 280, 302-03 (Miss. 1992); Jones v. State, 523 So. 2d 957, 961 (Miss. 1988); Clowers v. State, 522 So. 2d 762, 764 (Miss. 1988); Presley v. State, 474 So. 2d 612, 618-19 (Miss. 1985). ¶37. | 2 | 2 |
Billiot v. Stategreen2 sentences1995Billiot v. State, 478 So. 2d 1043, 1046 (Miss. 1988). 1995Billiot v. State, 478 So. 2d 1043, 1046 (Miss. 1988). | 2 | 2 |
Duckworth v. Warrengreen1 sentence2023This Court has adopted this standard and applied it to videotape evidence, finding that “Scott thus informs our courts that where the record contains a videotape of disputed facts capturing the events in question, the courts should view the story as depicted by the videotape, when one party’s version is blatantly contradicted, for the purpose of ruling on a summary judgment motion.” Duckworth v. Warren, 10 So. 3d 433, 438 (Miss. 2009) (emphasis added) (citing Scott, 550 U.S. at 380-81 ). | 1 | 1 |
Jacob Reynolds v. State of Mississippigreen1 sentence2021This Court has adopted the doctrine of “retroactive misjoinder.” Reynolds v. State, 227 So. 3d 428, 433 (¶22) (Miss. | 1 | 1 |
Williams v. Stategreen1 sentence2021Ct. App. 2017) (citing Williams v. State, 37 So. 3d 717, 720-21 (¶9) (Miss. | 1 | 1 |
Wicker v. Consolidated Rail Corporationgreen2 sentences2019Although this Court has adopted the analysis of Wicker v. Consolidated Rail Corp., 142 F.3d 690, 701 (3d Cir. 1998), that under section 5 an employee may release known risks, claims relating to unknown risks may not be released. 2019Although this Court has adopted the analysis of Wicker v. Consolidated Rail Corp. , 142 F.3d 690 , 701 (3d Cir. 1998), that under section 5 an employee may release known risks, claims relating to unknown risks may not be released. | 1 | 1 |
Payton v. Stategreen1 sentence2009Payton v. State, 708 So.2d 559, 560 (Miss.1998). | 1 | 1 |
Webb v. Braswellgreen1 sentence2008Webb v. Braswell, 930 So.2d 387, 397 (Miss.2006) (citing Miss. | 1 | 1 |
| Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Chadhagreen | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Solem v. Helmred1 sentence1996This Court has adopted the standard set forth by the United States Supreme Court in Solem v. Helm, 463 U.S. 277 (1983), overruled by Harmelin v. Michigan, 501 U.S. 957 (1991), to the extent that it found a guaranteed right to proportionality in the Eighth Amendment, for determining whether a sentence is cruel and unusual. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Howard v. State
green
2 sentences2014How *256 ard v. State, 319 So.2d 219 (1975); Hobson v. State, 285 So.2d 464 (Miss.1973); Allen v. State, 274 So.2d 136 (Miss.1973); Chandler v. State, 272 So.2d 641 (Miss.1973). 1976Howard v. State, Miss., 319 So.2d 219 (1975); Hobson v. State, 285 So.2d 464 (Miss. 1973); Allen v. State, 274 So.2d 136 (Miss. 1973); Chandler v. State, 272 So.2d 641 (Miss. 1973). 326 So.2d 794 , 795. | 3 | 1976–2014 |
Hobson v. State
green
2 sentences2014How *256 ard v. State, 319 So.2d 219 (1975); Hobson v. State, 285 So.2d 464 (Miss.1973); Allen v. State, 274 So.2d 136 (Miss.1973); Chandler v. State, 272 So.2d 641 (Miss.1973). 1976Howard v. State, Miss., 319 So.2d 219 (1975); Hobson v. State, 285 So.2d 464 (Miss. 1973); Allen v. State, 274 So.2d 136 (Miss. 1973); Chandler v. State, 272 So.2d 641 (Miss. 1973). 326 So.2d 794 , 795. | 3 | 1976–2014 |
Chandler v. State
green
2 sentences2014How *256 ard v. State, 319 So.2d 219 (1975); Hobson v. State, 285 So.2d 464 (Miss.1973); Allen v. State, 274 So.2d 136 (Miss.1973); Chandler v. State, 272 So.2d 641 (Miss.1973). 1976Howard v. State, Miss., 319 So.2d 219 (1975); Hobson v. State, 285 So.2d 464 (Miss. 1973); Allen v. State, 274 So.2d 136 (Miss. 1973); Chandler v. State, 272 So.2d 641 (Miss. 1973). 326 So.2d 794 , 795. | 3 | 1976–2014 |
Allen v. State
green
2 sentences2014How *256 ard v. State, 319 So.2d 219 (1975); Hobson v. State, 285 So.2d 464 (Miss.1973); Allen v. State, 274 So.2d 136 (Miss.1973); Chandler v. State, 272 So.2d 641 (Miss.1973). 1976Howard v. State, Miss., 319 So.2d 219 (1975); Hobson v. State, 285 So.2d 464 (Miss. 1973); Allen v. State, 274 So.2d 136 (Miss. 1973); Chandler v. State, 272 So.2d 641 (Miss. 1973). 326 So.2d 794 , 795. | 3 | 1976–2014 |
Strickland v. Washington
green
2 sentences2009This Court has adopted the standard set forth in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), to analyze a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. 2009This Court has adopted the standard set forth in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), to analyze a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. | 2 | 2008–2009 |
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
green
2 sentences2008To determine the admissibility of expert testimony, this Court has adopted the standard initially set out by the United States Supreme Court in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993), and later modified in Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael, 526 U.S. 137 , 119 S.Ct. 1167 , 143 L.Ed.2d 238 (1999). 2008To determine the admissibility of expert testimony, this Court has adopted the standard initially set out by the United States Supreme Court in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993), and later modified in Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael, 526 U.S. 137 , 119 S.Ct. 1167 , 143 L.Ed.2d 238 (1999). | 2 | 2006–2008 |
Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael
green
2 sentences2008To determine the admissibility of expert testimony, this Court has adopted the standard initially set out by the United States Supreme Court in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993), and later modified in Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael, 526 U.S. 137 , 119 S.Ct. 1167 , 143 L.Ed.2d 238 (1999). 2008To determine the admissibility of expert testimony, this Court has adopted the standard initially set out by the United States Supreme Court in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993), and later modified in Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael, 526 U.S. 137 , 119 S.Ct. 1167 , 143 L.Ed.2d 238 (1999). | 2 | 2006–2008 |
United States v. Frederick Mathews
green
2 sentences2001Id. (citing Lockett v. State, 517 So.2d 1346, 1350 (Miss.1987)). "`Great deference' has been defined in the Batson context as insulating from appellate reversal any trial findings which are not clearly erroneous." Lockett v. State, 517 So.2d at 1349 -50 (citing United States v. Mathews, 803 F.2d 325 (7th Cir.1986)). 1999Id. (citing Lockett v. State, 517 So. 2d 1346, 1350 (Miss. 1987)). "'Great deference' has been defined in the Batson context as insulating from appellate reversal any trial findings which are not clearly erroneous." Lockett v. State, 517 So. 2d at 1349 -50 (citing United States v. Mathews, 803 F.2d 325 (7th Cir. 1986)). | 2 | 1999–2001 |
Wallace v. State
green
2 sentences1999See Stromas, 618 So.2d at 122-23 (Miss.1993); Wallace, 607 So.2d at 1188 ; Fleming v. State, 604 So.2d 280, 302-03 (Miss.1992); Jones v. State, 523 So.2d 957, 961 (Miss.1988); Clowers v. State, 522 So.2d 762, 764 (Miss.1988); Presley v. State, 474 So.2d 612, 618-19 (Miss.1985). ¶ 37. 1997See Stromas, 618 So. 2d at 122-23 (Miss. 1993); Wallace, 607 So. 2d at 1188 ; Fleming v. State, 604 So. 2d 280, 302-03 (Miss. 1992); Jones v. State, 523 So. 2d 957, 961 (Miss. 1988); Clowers v. State, 522 So. 2d 762, 764 (Miss. 1988); Presley v. State, 474 So. 2d 612, 618-19 (Miss. 1985). ¶37. | 2 | 1997–1999 |
Creed v. State
green
2 sentences1969Nichols v. State, 1935, 174 Miss. 271 , 164 So. 20 ; Creed v. State, 1937, 179 Miss. 700 , 176 So. 596 . ( 217 Miss. at 785 , 65 So. at 264). 1969Nichols v. State, 1935, 174 Miss. 271 , 164 So. 20 ; Creed v. State, 1937, 179 Miss. 700 , 176 So. 596 . ( 217 Miss. at 785 , 65 So. at 264). | 2 | 1953–1969 |
Nichols v. State
green
2 sentences1969Nichols v. State, 1935, 174 Miss. 271 , 164 So. 20 ; Creed v. State, 1937, 179 Miss. 700 , 176 So. 596 . ( 217 Miss. at 785 , 65 So. at 264). 1969Nichols v. State, 1935, 174 Miss. 271 , 164 So. 20 ; Creed v. State, 1937, 179 Miss. 700 , 176 So. 596 . ( 217 Miss. at 785 , 65 So. at 264). | 2 | 1953–1969 |
Scott v. Harris
green
2 sentences2023This Court has adopted this standard and applied it to videotape evidence, finding that “Scott thus informs our courts that where the record contains a videotape of disputed facts capturing the events in question, the courts should view the story as depicted by the videotape, when one party’s version is blatantly contradicted, for the purpose of ruling on a summary judgment motion.” Duckworth v. Warren, 10 So. 3d 433, 438 (Miss. 2009) (emphasis added) (citing Scott, 550 U.S. at 380-81 ). 2023The one party’s version must be “blatantly contradicted by the record, so that no reasonable jury could believe it[.]” Scott, 550 U.S. at 380 . ¶26. | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Harmelin v. Michigan
green
1 sentence1996This Court has adopted the standard set forth by the United States Supreme Court in Solem v. Helm, 463 U.S. 277 (1983), overruled by Harmelin v. Michigan, 501 U.S. 957 (1991), to the extent that it found a guaranteed right to proportionality in the Eighth Amendment, for determining whether a sentence is cruel and unusual. | 1 | 1996–1996 |
| United States v. Otha Lee Mahone green | 1 | 1989–1989 |
| Mister v. State green | 1 | 1979–1979 |
| State v. Sansome green | 1 | 1977–1977 |
| Ellis v. State neutral | 1 | 1977–1977 |
| BELLEW v. State green | 1 | 1977–1977 |
| Cox v. State green | 1 | 1976–1976 |
| Pegram v. State green | 1 | 1970–1970 |
| Henry v. State green | 1 | 1969–1969 |
| Miller v. Fisher neutral | 1 | 1963–1963 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.