6 Arizona opinions name it 2 courts 1911–1988 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arizona courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
City of Glendale v. Suttergreen2 sentences1969That policy is summarized in the later decision, City of Glendale v. Sutter, 54 Ariz. 326, 330 , 95 P.2d 569, 570 (1939), as follows: "Owing to the peculiar problems indigenous to the desert country, where all gardening, farming and cultivation are carried on by irrigation, this court has adopted the rule that it is not negligence to carry water for farming purposes in *327 an open ditch or open flume. 1969That policy is summarized in the later decision, City of Glendale v. Sutter, 54 Ariz. 326, 330 , 95 P.2d 569, 570 (1939), as follows: "Owing to the peculiar problems indigenous to the desert country, where all gardening, farming and cultivation are carried on by irrigation, this court has adopted the rule that it is not negligence to carry water for farming purposes in *327 an open ditch or open flume. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arizona. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Arizona v. Mauro
green
1 sentence1988The Supreme Court in Arizona v. Mauro applied the standard set forth in Rhode Island v. Innis, 446 U.S. 291 , 100 S.Ct. 1682 , 64 L.Ed.2d 297 (1980), that interrogation includes a “ ‘practice that the police should know is reasonably likely to evoke an incriminating response from a suspect.’ ” Arizona v. Mauro, 107 S.Ct. at 1934 , quoting Rhode Island v. Innis, 446 U.S. at 301 , 100 S.Ct. at 1690 . | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Rhode Island v. Innis
green
2 sentences1988The Supreme Court in Arizona v. Mauro applied the standard set forth in Rhode Island v. Innis, 446 U.S. 291 , 100 S.Ct. 1682 , 64 L.Ed.2d 297 (1980), that interrogation includes a “ ‘practice that the police should know is reasonably likely to evoke an incriminating response from a suspect.’ ” Arizona v. Mauro, 107 S.Ct. at 1934 , quoting Rhode Island v. Innis, 446 U.S. at 301 , 100 S.Ct. at 1690 . 1988The Supreme Court in Arizona v. Mauro applied the standard set forth in Rhode Island v. Innis, 446 U.S. 291 , 100 S.Ct. 1682 , 64 L.Ed.2d 297 (1980), that interrogation includes a “ ‘practice that the police should know is reasonably likely to evoke an incriminating response from a suspect.’ ” Arizona v. Mauro, 107 S.Ct. at 1934 , quoting Rhode Island v. Innis, 446 U.S. at 301 , 100 S.Ct. at 1690 . | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Waugh v. Lennard
green
2 sentences1963Waugh v. Lennard, 69 Ariz. 214 , 211 P.2d 806 (1949). 1963Waugh v. Lennard, 69 Ariz. 214 , 211 P.2d 806 (1949). | 1 | 1963–1963 |
In re Medidas Judiciales para Atender Emergencias Causadas por la Tormenta Tropical Isaac
neutral
1 sentence1926Whatever the rule in other jurisdictions, this court has adopted the rule of allowing interest upon unliquidated demands “from the time of the commencement of the action.” Fidelity, etc., v. California-Arizona Co., 21 Ariz. 172 , 186 Pac. 502 . | 1 | 1926–1926 |
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. California-Arizona Construction Co.
green
1 sentence1926Whatever the rule in other jurisdictions, this court has adopted the rule of allowing interest upon unliquidated demands “from the time of the commencement of the action.” Fidelity, etc., v. California-Arizona Co., 21 Ariz. 172 , 186 Pac. 502 . | 1 | 1926–1926 |
Calumet v. Gardner
neutral
2 sentences1922Co. v. Gardner, 21 Ariz. 206 , 187 Pac. 563 . 1922Co. v. Gardner, 21 Ariz. 206 , 187 Pac. 563 . | 1 | 1922–1922 |
Illinois Central Railroad v. Campbell
neutral
2 sentences1911They are Railroad Co. v. Campbell, 170 Ill. 163 , 49 N. E. 314 ; Lasater v. Fant (Tex. Civ. 1911They are Railroad Co. v. Campbell, 170 Ill. 163 , 49 N. E. 314 ; Lasater v. Fant (Tex. Civ. | 1 | 1911–1911 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.