has adopted test (New Jersey) · Go Syfert
← New Jersey issues

has adopted test in New Jersey

7 New Jersey opinions name it 3 courts 1996–2024 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (5)

CaseFollowedCited
DeNike v. Cupogreen
nj · 2008 · cited in 1 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 2024–2024
1 sentence

2024To that end, Rule 1:12-2 states that "[a]ny party, on motion made to the judge before trial or argument and stating the reasons therefore, may seek that judge's disqualification." When reviewing the appearance of impropriety, the Court has adopted the test in DeNike v. Cupo, which requires a determination as to whether "a reasonable, fully informed A-2333-22 14 person [would] have doubts about the judge's impartiality." 196 N.J. 502, 517 (2008).

11
Hopkins v. Fox & Lazo Realtorsgreen
nj · 1993 · cited in 1 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 2021–2021
2 sentences

2021To evaluate the relevant fairness and policy considerations at issue, this Court has adopted a test that requires “identifying, weighing, and balancing several factors -- the relationship of the parties, the nature of the attendant risk, the opportunity and ability to exercise care, and the public interest in the proposed solution.” Hopkins v. Fox & Lazo Realtors, 132 N.J. 426, 439 (1993).

2021And, to evaluate “under all of the circumstances” the relevant fairness and policy considerations at issue, this Court has adopted a test that requires “identifying, weighing, and balancing several factors -- the relationship of the parties, the nature of the attendant risk, the opportunity and ability to exercise care, and the public interest in the proposed solution.” Hopkins v. Fox & Lazo Realtors, 132 N.J. 426, 439 (1993). 18 “The determination of the foreseeability of harm and considerations of fairness and policy are connected,” with some overlap among the considerations relevant to each

11
T.M.S. v. W.C.P.green
njsuperctappdiv · 2017 · cited in 1 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 2018–2018
1 sentence

2018See T.M.S. v. W.C.P. , 450 N.J.

11
State v. Fritzgreen
nj · 1987 · cited in 1 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 2013–2013
2 sentences

2013State v. Fritz, 105 N.J. 42, 58 , 519 A.2d 336 (1987).

2013State v. Fritz, 105 N.J. 42, 58 , 519 A.2d 336 (1987).

11
Richardson v. Directorgreen
njtaxct · 1994 · cited in 1 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 2001–2001
2 sentences

2001See Richardson, supra, 14 N.J.Tax at 365 .

2001See Richardson, supra, 14 N.J.Tax at 365 .

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (6)

CaseCitedYears
Carvalho v. Toll Bros. and Developers green
nj · 1996
1 sentence

2021Carvalho, 143 N.J. at 573 .

12021–2021
In Re a Resolution of the State Commission of Investigation green
nj · 1987
2 sentences

2015In re: State Comm’n of Investigation, 108 N.J. 35, 41 , 527 A.2d 851 (1987).

2015In re: State Comm’n of Investigation, 108 N.J. 35, 41 , 527 A.2d 851 (1987).

12015–2015
Cort v. Ash green
scotus · 1975
2 sentences

2015When no such private cause of action is expressly set forth in the statute, as in this case, the Court has adopted the factors set forth in the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Cort v. Ash, 422 U.S. 66 , 95 S.Ct. 2080 , 45 L.Ed.2d 26 (1975) to determine if such a cause of action is implied.

2015When no such private cause of action is expressly set forth in the statute, as in this case, the Court has adopted the factors set forth in the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Cort v. Ash, 422 U.S. 66 , 95 S.Ct. 2080 , 45 L.Ed.2d 26 (1975) to determine if such a cause of action is implied.

12015–2015
Landgraf v. USI Film Products green
scotus · 1994
2 sentences

2001The United States Supreme Court reiterated its preference for prospective application of statutory amendments in Landgraf v. USI Film Products, 511 U.S. 244, 273 , 114 S.Ct. 1483, 1501 , 128 L.Ed.2d 229 (1994), (confirming that there remains “a presumption against statutory retroactivity.”) This court has adopted the presumption discussed in Landgraf, supra, 511 U.S. at 273 , 114 S.Ct. at 1501 , 128 L.Ed.2d 229 .

2001The United States Supreme Court reiterated its preference for prospective application of statutory amendments in Landgraf v. USI Film Products, 511 U.S. 244, 273 , 114 S.Ct. 1483, 1501 , 128 L.Ed.2d 229 (1994), (confirming that there remains “a presumption against statutory retroactivity.”) This court has adopted the presumption discussed in Landgraf, supra, 511 U.S. at 273 , 114 S.Ct. at 1501 , 128 L.Ed.2d 229 .

12001–2001
Carpet Remnant Warehouse, Inc. v. New Jersey Department of Labor green
nj · 1991
2 sentences

1996E.g., Carpet Remnant Warehouse, Inc. v. Dept. of Labor, 125 N.J. 567, 579-80 , 593 A.2d 1177 (1991); Millison v. E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 101 N.J. 161, 203 , 501 A.2d 505 (1985) (Handler, J., concurring in part and dissenting).

1996E.g., Carpet Remnant Warehouse, Inc. v. Dept. of Labor, 125 N.J. 567, 579-80 , 593 A.2d 1177 (1991); Millison v. E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 101 N.J. 161, 203 , 501 A.2d 505 (1985) (Handler, J., concurring in part and dissenting).

11996–1996
Millison v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. green
nj · 1985
2 sentences

1996E.g., Carpet Remnant Warehouse, Inc. v. Dept. of Labor, 125 N.J. 567, 579-80 , 593 A.2d 1177 (1991); Millison v. E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 101 N.J. 161, 203 , 501 A.2d 505 (1985) (Handler, J., concurring in part and dissenting).

1996E.g., Carpet Remnant Warehouse, Inc. v. Dept. of Labor, 125 N.J. 567, 579-80 , 593 A.2d 1177 (1991); Millison v. E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 101 N.J. 161, 203 , 501 A.2d 505 (1985) (Handler, J., concurring in part and dissenting).

11996–1996

Where else courts name it

MS 37 (1953–2023) WA 30 (1900–2019) RI 22 (1981–2011) OK 21 (1920–2004) AR 21 (1898–2019) MT 20 (1890–2025) WI 17 (1909–2005) KY 17 (1915–1977) NE 17 (1906–2024) IL 15 (1902–2024) ID 14 (1949–2020) AL 14 (1889–2005) OH 13 (1991–2024) LA 13 (1932–1991) PA 13 (1963–2025) TX 12 (1974–2022) MI 11 (1894–2023) MD 11 (1910–2023) MN 11 (1901–1997) WV 11 (1946–2013) OR 10 (1900–1987) DC 10 (1991–2024) NC 9 (1931–2019) NJ 7 (1996–2024) IN 7 (1885–2004) HI 7 (1988–2019) VT 7 (1998–2020) SD 6 (1905–1995) MO 6 (1911–2003) AZ 6 (1911–1988) IA 5 (1882–1939) CT 5 (1987–2006) ND 4 (1970–2021) UT 4 (1920–1992) CO 4 (1987–2002) KS 4 (1933–2018) CA 4 (1891–1991) NY 4 (1928–2014) NH 3 (1970–1980) VI 3 (2013–2025) FL 3 (1959–1995) WY 2 (1986–1987) DE 2 (1991–2017) TN 2 (1922–1957) MA 2 (1986–2019) GA 2 (1928–1985) NV 2 (1973–2012) AK 2 (2017–2017) NM 2 (1974–1977)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check