Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Iowa opinions name it 1 courts 1882–1939 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Comstock v. Wood
neutral
1 sentence1939R. 768, which case has been followed in In re Estate of Mikkelsen, 202 Iowa 842 , 211 N. W. 254 ; Schultz v. Locke, 204 Iowa 1127 , 216 N. W. 617 ; and Lusby v. Wing, 207 Iowa 1287 , 224 N. W. 554 , where we have committed this court to the doctrine that the right of set-off, when it exists, is available'against the real estate as well as the personal property inherited.’ ” We find that this court has adopted the rule that the right of offset exists against the real estate only when the heir is insolvent. | 1 | 1939–1939 |
Lusby v. Wing
green
2 sentences1939R. 768, which case has been followed in In re Estate of Mikkelsen, 202 Iowa 842 , 211 N. W. 254 ; Schultz v. Locke, 204 Iowa 1127 , 216 N. W. 617 ; and Lusby v. Wing, 207 Iowa 1287 , 224 N. W. 554 , where we have committed this court to the doctrine that the right of set-off, when it exists, is available'against the real estate as well as the personal property inherited.’ ” We find that this court has adopted the rule that the right of offset exists against the real estate only when the heir is insolvent. 1939R. 768, which case has been followed in In re Estate of Mikkelsen, 202 Iowa 842 , 211 N. W. 254 ; Schultz v. Locke, 204 Iowa 1127 , 216 N. W. 617 ; and Lusby v. Wing, 207 Iowa 1287 , 224 N. W. 554 , where we have committed this court to the doctrine that the right of set-off, when it exists, is available'against the real estate as well as the personal property inherited.’ ” We find that this court has adopted the rule that the right of offset exists against the real estate only when the heir is insolvent. | 1 | 1939–1939 |
Schultz v. Locke
neutral
1 sentence1939R. 768, which case has been followed in In re Estate of Mikkelsen, 202 Iowa 842 , 211 N. W. 254 ; Schultz v. Locke, 204 Iowa 1127 , 216 N. W. 617 ; and Lusby v. Wing, 207 Iowa 1287 , 224 N. W. 554 , where we have committed this court to the doctrine that the right of set-off, when it exists, is available'against the real estate as well as the personal property inherited.’ ” We find that this court has adopted the rule that the right of offset exists against the real estate only when the heir is insolvent. | 1 | 1939–1939 |
In Re Estate of Mikkelsen
green
2 sentences1939R. 768, which case has been followed in In re Estate of Mikkelsen, 202 Iowa 842 , 211 N. W. 254 ; Schultz v. Locke, 204 Iowa 1127 , 216 N. W. 617 ; and Lusby v. Wing, 207 Iowa 1287 , 224 N. W. 554 , where we have committed this court to the doctrine that the right of set-off, when it exists, is available'against the real estate as well as the personal property inherited.’ ” We find that this court has adopted the rule that the right of offset exists against the real estate only when the heir is insolvent. 1939R. 768, which case has been followed in In re Estate of Mikkelsen, 202 Iowa 842 , 211 N. W. 254 ; Schultz v. Locke, 204 Iowa 1127 , 216 N. W. 617 ; and Lusby v. Wing, 207 Iowa 1287 , 224 N. W. 554 , where we have committed this court to the doctrine that the right of set-off, when it exists, is available'against the real estate as well as the personal property inherited.’ ” We find that this court has adopted the rule that the right of offset exists against the real estate only when the heir is insolvent. | 1 | 1939–1939 |
Mennig v. Graves
green
1 sentence1932Mennig v. Graves, 211 Iowa 758 . | 1 | 1932–1932 |
Buchan v. German American Land Co.
neutral
1 sentence1932It is true that no original notice can be served on a person not in esse, altho this court has adopted the rule of virtual representation, and recognized in Buchan v. German American Land Co., 180 Iowa 911 , said doctrine, but refused to extend such doctrine to the extent which is defined in the recent statute (Section 12351-dl, Code, 1931). | 1 | 1932–1932 |
Hollis v. State Insurance
green
1 sentence1895In Hollis v. Insurance Co., 65 Iowa, 454 , it is said: “When plaintiff asserted a claim under the policy for the loss, and defendant was advised of the facts out of which the forfeiture grew, it had the right to treat the contract as at an end. | 1 | 1895–1895 |
State v. Richards
green
1 sentence1886State v. Richards, 33 Iowa, 420 . | 1 | 1886–1886 |
Murray v. Graham
neutral
2 sentences1882Murray v. Graham, 29 Iowa, 520 ; Kranse v. Meyer, 32 Id., 566 ; Morrison Bros., v. Huggins, 53 Id., 76. 1882Murray v. Graham, 29 Iowa, 520 ; Kranse v. Meyer, 32 Id., 566 ; Morrison Bros., v. Huggins, 53 Id., 76. | 1 | 1882–1882 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.