Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Oklahoma opinions name it 2 courts 1911–2024 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oklahoma courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oklahoma. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oklahoma. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
FOX v. CROWGEY
neutral
2 sentences2024Fox v. Crowgey , 2015 OK CIV APP 23, ¶ 31 , 346 P.3d 425 , 432--33 (citing Clark v. Bearden , 1995 OK 71, ¶ 11 , 903 P.2d 309, 312 ). 2024Fox v. Crowgey , 2015 OK CIV APP 23, ¶ 31 , 346 P.3d 425 , 432--33 (citing Clark v. Bearden , 1995 OK 71, ¶ 11 , 903 P.2d 309, 312 ). | 2 | 2024–2024 |
Clark v. Bearden
green
2 sentences2024Fox v. Crowgey , 2015 OK CIV APP 23, ¶ 31 , 346 P.3d 425 , 432--33 (citing Clark v. Bearden , 1995 OK 71, ¶ 11 , 903 P.2d 309, 312 ). 2024Fox v. Crowgey , 2015 OK CIV APP 23, ¶ 31 , 346 P.3d 425 , 432--33 (citing Clark v. Bearden , 1995 OK 71, ¶ 11 , 903 P.2d 309, 312 ). | 2 | 2024–2024 |
Acox v. Acox
neutral
1 sentence2011Acox v. Acox, 2000 OK CIV APP 136 , 18 P.3d 368 . | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Midwestern Engine and Equipment Co. v. Childers
green
2 sentences1991We held that “[sjince there is no ruling by the court excluding the evidence, no error in this regard is presented for review.” Id., at 740-41 . 1991We held that "[s]ince there is no ruling by the court excluding the evidence, no error in this regard is presented for review." Id., at 740-41 . | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Kent v. Dakota Fire & Marine Insurance
neutral
1 sentence1911Co., 2 S. D. 300, 50 N. W. 85 , and reads as follows: “The party alleging error in this court 'must be able to establish affirmatively the existence of such error by the record. | 1 | 1911–1911 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.