Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 West Virginia opinions name it 1 courts 1882–1921 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by West Virginia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Doolittle v. . Supervisors of Broome Countygreen1 sentence1885(Denio, J. in Roosevelt v. Draper et al., 23 N. Y. 318 ; see also Doolittle et al. v. Supervisors, &c. 18 N. Y. 155 .) The case of Roosevelt v. Draper et al., 23 N. Y. 318 decided in 1861 is the latest decision on the subject in the court of appeals, to which our attention has been called. | 1 | 1 |
Roosevelt v. . Drapergreen2 sentences1885(Denio, J. in Roosevelt v. Draper et al., 23 N. Y. 318 ; see also Doolittle et al. v. Supervisors, &c. 18 N. Y. 155 .) The case of Roosevelt v. Draper et al., 23 N. Y. 318 decided in 1861 is the latest decision on the subject in the court of appeals, to which our attention has been called. 1885(Denio, J. in Roosevelt v. Draper et al., 23 N. Y. 318 ; see also Doolittle et al. v. Supervisors, &c. 18 N. Y. 155 .) The case of Roosevelt v. Draper et al., 23 N. Y. 318 decided in 1861 is the latest decision on the subject in the court of appeals, to which our attention has been called. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in West Virginia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Ruffner, Donnally & Co. v. Hewitt, Kercheval & Co.
green
2 sentences1896For any claim outstanding, paid or collected by either partner, would form an item in the account between them, and take the case out of the bar of the statute;”—citing Ruffner v. Hewitt, 7 W. 1882Ruffner v. Hewitt, 7 W. | 2 | 1882–1896 |
Pittsburgh & West Va. Gas Co. v. Ankrom
green
1 sentence1921In Pittsburg and West Virginia Gas Company v. Ankrom, 83 W. | 1 | 1921–1921 |
Winsor v. Mills
green
1 sentence1907Winson v. Miller, 157 Mass. 362 . | 1 | 1907–1907 |
Boggs v. Johnson
neutral
1 sentence1896Va. 585 , in which case this Court held that “until the affairs of the partnership are settled, and outstanding engagements made good, the partnership must, in contemplation of law, have a continuance, so far as respects the winding up of its affairs.” The appellants rely on the case of Boggs’ Adm’r v. Johnson’s Adm’r, 26 W. | 1 | 1896–1896 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.