probation revocation hearing in Louisiana

23 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1970–2025 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (11)

Case	Followed	Cited
Gagnon v. Scarpellired scotus · 1973 · cited in 5 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1973–2025 2 sentences 2025See Gagnon v. Scarpelli, 411 U.S. 778, 782 , 93 S.Ct. 1756 , 1759- 60, 36 L.Ed.2d 656 (1973); see also La. 2025See Gagnon v. Scarpelli, 411 U.S. 778, 782 , 93 S.Ct. 1756 , 1759- 60, 36 L.Ed.2d 656 (1973); see also La.	3	5
Morrissey v. Brewergreen scotus · 1972 · cited in 3 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1975–2005 2 sentences 1988The district court is ordered to conduct a probation revocation hearing at which relators are afforded the assistance of counsel and the due process requirements for such a hearing dictated by Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471 , 92 S.Ct. 2593 , 33 L.Ed.2d 484 (1972), are observed. 1988The district court is ordered to conduct a probation revocation hearing at which relators are afforded the assistance of counsel and the due process requirements for such a hearing dictated by Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471 , 92 S.Ct. 2593 , 33 L.Ed.2d 484 (1972), are observed.	1	3
State v. O'CONNERgreen la · 1975 · cited in 2 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1979–2021 2 sentences 2021State v. O’Conner, 312 So.2d 645, 646 (La. 1975)(citations omitted). 1979State v. O'Conner, 312 So.2d 645 (La.1975); State v. Harris, 312 So.2d 643 (La.1975).	1	2
State v. Michaelgreen lactapp · 2005 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 2005–2005 1 sentence 2005See also State v. Michael, 39,439 (La.App. 2 Cir. 1/7/05), 891 So.2d 109 , writ denied, 05-0354 (La.6/17/05), 904 So.2d 681 , where this court held that a victim's statements to police after being transported to the hospital were admissible in a probation revocation hearing.	1	1
State v. Michaelgreen la · 2005 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 2005–2005 1 sentence 2005See also State v. Michael, 39,439 (La.App. 2 Cir. 1/7/05), 891 So.2d 109 , writ denied, 05-0354 (La.6/17/05), 904 So.2d 681 , where this court held that a victim's statements to police after being transported to the hospital were admissible in a probation revocation hearing.	1	1
State v. Blackgreen la · 1997 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 2004–2004 2 sentences 2004See also State v. Black, supra, noting the relaxation of the rules of evidence in a probation revocation hearing. 2004State v. Black, supra; State v. Fields, supra; State v. Sussmann, supra; State v. Harris, supra; State v. Lassai, supra; See also Baggert v. State, supra (involving a parole revocation hearing).	1	1
Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Jonesgreen la · 1990 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1996–1996 1 sentence 1996See State v. Conley, 570 So.2d 1161 (La.1990), State v. Dickerson, 579 So.2d 472 (La.App. 3 Cir.1991), Bearden v. Georgia, 461 U.S. 660 , 103 S.Ct. 2064 , 76 L.Ed.2d 221 (1983), and State v. Coates, 528 So.2d 595 (La.App. 2 Cir.1988).	1	1
State v. Coatesgreen lactapp · 1988 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1996–1996 1 sentence 1996See State v. Conley, 570 So.2d 1161 (La.1990), State v. Dickerson, 579 So.2d 472 (La.App. 3 Cir.1991), Bearden v. Georgia, 461 U.S. 660 , 103 S.Ct. 2064 , 76 L.Ed.2d 221 (1983), and State v. Coates, 528 So.2d 595 (La.App. 2 Cir.1988).	1	1
State v. Dickersongreen lactapp · 1991 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1996–1996 1 sentence 1996See State v. Conley, 570 So.2d 1161 (La.1990), State v. Dickerson, 579 So.2d 472 (La.App. 3 Cir.1991), Bearden v. Georgia, 461 U.S. 660 , 103 S.Ct. 2064 , 76 L.Ed.2d 221 (1983), and State v. Coates, 528 So.2d 595 (La.App. 2 Cir.1988).	1	1
Bearden v. Georgiagreen scotus · 1983 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1996–1996 2 sentences 1996See State v. Conley, 570 So.2d 1161 (La.1990), State v. Dickerson, 579 So.2d 472 (La.App. 3 Cir.1991), Bearden v. Georgia, 461 U.S. 660 , 103 S.Ct. 2064 , 76 L.Ed.2d 221 (1983), and State v. Coates, 528 So.2d 595 (La.App. 2 Cir.1988). 1996See State v. Conley, 570 So.2d 1161 (La.1990), State v. Dickerson, 579 So.2d 472 (La.App. 3 Cir.1991), Bearden v. Georgia, 461 U.S. 660 , 103 S.Ct. 2064 , 76 L.Ed.2d 221 (1983), and State v. Coates, 528 So.2d 595 (La.App. 2 Cir.1988).	1	1
U. S. Ex Rel. Lombardino v. Heydgreen laed · 1970 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1972–1972	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (23)

Case	Cited	Years
State v. Harris green la · 1975 2 sentences 1990"However, this is not to hold that the underlying facts or evidence (as opposed to the conviction or plea itself), on which the prior conviction or plea is based can not be introduced at a probation revocation hearing to prove that defendant has in fact been guilty of misconduct which might constitute a violation of his probation." Id., at 644 . 1985On the other hand, in a probation revocation hearing, the defendant does not begin with a clean slate although, as stated in State v. Harris, 312 So.2d 643 (La.1975), he “is entitled to certain minimal procedural protection”.	4	1979–1990
State v. Davis green la · 1979 2 sentences 2004State v. Davis, 375 So.2d 69 (La.1979), citing Gagnon v. Scarpell 411 U.S. at 786-787 , 93 S.Ct. 1756 ; State v. Fields, 95-2481 (La.App. 1st Cir.12/20/96), 686 So.2d 107 . 1986State v. Davis, 375 So.2d 69 (La.1979); State v. Sussmann, 374 So.2d 1256 (La.1979).	3	1982–2004
State v. Sussmann green la · 1979 2 sentences 2004State v. Black, supra; State v. Fields, supra; State v. Sussmann, supra; State v. Harris, supra; State v. Lassai, supra; See also Baggert v. State, supra (involving a parole revocation hearing). 1986State v. Davis, 375 So.2d 69 (La.1979); State v. Sussmann, 374 So.2d 1256 (La.1979).	2	1986–2004
State v. Lassai green la · 1978 2 sentences 2004State v. Black, supra; State v. Fields, supra; State v. Sussmann, supra; State v. Harris, supra; State v. Lassai, supra; See also Baggert v. State, supra (involving a parole revocation hearing). 1986In State v. Lassai, supra, admissions to a probationary officer of criminal conduct were admissible at a probation revocation hearing and formed a basis for the revocation of probation.	2	1986–2004
State v. Harris green la · 1979 2 sentences 2004State v. Black, supra; State v. Fields, supra; State v. Sussmann, supra; State v. Harris, supra; State v. Lassai, supra; See also Baggert v. State, supra (involving a parole revocation hearing). 1987State v. Harris, 368 So.2d 1066 (La.1979).	2	1987–2004
Boykin v. Alabama green scotus · 1969 2 sentences 2011Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 , 89 S.Ct. 1709 , 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969). 2011Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 , 89 S.Ct. 1709 , 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969).	1	2011–2011
State v. Fields green lactapp · 1996 1 sentence 2004State v. Davis, 375 So.2d 69 (La.1979), citing Gagnon v. Scarpell 411 U.S. at 786-787 , 93 S.Ct. 1756 ; State v. Fields, 95-2481 (La.App. 1st Cir.12/20/96), 686 So.2d 107 .	1	2004–2004
State v. Pearson neutral lactapp · 1982 1 sentence 2004State v. Pearson, 424 So.2d 399 (La.App. 2d Cir.1982).	1	2004–2004
Baggert v. State green la · 1977 1 sentence 1998Baggert v. State, 350 So.2d 652 (La.1977).	1	1998–1998
State v. Pittman green lactapp · 1991 1 sentence 1994This is a sentencing error based on LSA-C.Cr.P. art. 901(C)(2) and this Court's prior holding in State v. Pittman, 585 So.2d 591 (La.App. 5 Cir.1991) because: Article 901(C)(2), which governs revocation of probation for commission of another offense, states that: In case of revocation provided for in this Article ... [w]hen the new conviction is a Louisiana conviction, the sentence shall run consecutively with the sentence for the new conviction, unless the court originally imposing the suspension of probation specifically orders that said sentences are to be served concurrently, in which case	1	1994–1994
State v. Varnado neutral la · 1980 1 sentence 1990Likewise, in State v. Varnado, 384 So.2d 440 (La.1980), the Supreme Court ruled *798 that the relator's uncounseled guilty plea to a charge of possession of marijuana was inadmissible and could not serve as a basis to revoke his probation on a prior aggravated battery conviction.	1	1990–1990
State v. Jones green lactapp · 1987 1 sentence 1988Applicant relies on State v. Jennings, 478 So.2d 913 (La.App. 5th Cir.1985), writ denied 481 So.2d 636 (La.1986); State v. Jones, 517 So.2d 402 (La.App. 5th Cir.1987), writ denied 522 So.2d 560 (La.1988); State v. Robert, 518 So.2d 1169 (La.App. 5th Cir.1988); State v. Jackson, 519 So.2d 254 (La.App. 5th Cir.1988); State v. Davenport, 520 So.2d 463 (La.App. 5th Cir.1988); and State v. Weilbaecher, 520 So.2d 456 (La.App. 5th Cir. 1988), a line of decisions by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal which hold that in order for a conviction and sentence to be effective there must be a judgment signed	1	1988–1988
State v. Jennings neutral la · 1986 1 sentence 1988Applicant relies on State v. Jennings, 478 So.2d 913 (La.App. 5th Cir.1985), writ denied 481 So.2d 636 (La.1986); State v. Jones, 517 So.2d 402 (La.App. 5th Cir.1987), writ denied 522 So.2d 560 (La.1988); State v. Robert, 518 So.2d 1169 (La.App. 5th Cir.1988); State v. Jackson, 519 So.2d 254 (La.App. 5th Cir.1988); State v. Davenport, 520 So.2d 463 (La.App. 5th Cir.1988); and State v. Weilbaecher, 520 So.2d 456 (La.App. 5th Cir. 1988), a line of decisions by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal which hold that in order for a conviction and sentence to be effective there must be a judgment signed	1	1988–1988
State v. Jackson green lactapp · 1988 1 sentence 1988Applicant relies on State v. Jennings, 478 So.2d 913 (La.App. 5th Cir.1985), writ denied 481 So.2d 636 (La.1986); State v. Jones, 517 So.2d 402 (La.App. 5th Cir.1987), writ denied 522 So.2d 560 (La.1988); State v. Robert, 518 So.2d 1169 (La.App. 5th Cir.1988); State v. Jackson, 519 So.2d 254 (La.App. 5th Cir.1988); State v. Davenport, 520 So.2d 463 (La.App. 5th Cir.1988); and State v. Weilbaecher, 520 So.2d 456 (La.App. 5th Cir. 1988), a line of decisions by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal which hold that in order for a conviction and sentence to be effective there must be a judgment signed	1	1988–1988
State v. Jennings green lactapp · 1985 1 sentence 1988Applicant relies on State v. Jennings, 478 So.2d 913 (La.App. 5th Cir.1985), writ denied 481 So.2d 636 (La.1986); State v. Jones, 517 So.2d 402 (La.App. 5th Cir.1987), writ denied 522 So.2d 560 (La.1988); State v. Robert, 518 So.2d 1169 (La.App. 5th Cir.1988); State v. Jackson, 519 So.2d 254 (La.App. 5th Cir.1988); State v. Davenport, 520 So.2d 463 (La.App. 5th Cir.1988); and State v. Weilbaecher, 520 So.2d 456 (La.App. 5th Cir. 1988), a line of decisions by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal which hold that in order for a conviction and sentence to be effective there must be a judgment signed	1	1988–1988
State v. Davenport green lactapp · 1988 1 sentence 1988Applicant relies on State v. Jennings, 478 So.2d 913 (La.App. 5th Cir.1985), writ denied 481 So.2d 636 (La.1986); State v. Jones, 517 So.2d 402 (La.App. 5th Cir.1987), writ denied 522 So.2d 560 (La.1988); State v. Robert, 518 So.2d 1169 (La.App. 5th Cir.1988); State v. Jackson, 519 So.2d 254 (La.App. 5th Cir.1988); State v. Davenport, 520 So.2d 463 (La.App. 5th Cir.1988); and State v. Weilbaecher, 520 So.2d 456 (La.App. 5th Cir. 1988), a line of decisions by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal which hold that in order for a conviction and sentence to be effective there must be a judgment signed	1	1988–1988
State v. Weilbaecher neutral lactapp · 1988 1 sentence 1988Applicant relies on State v. Jennings, 478 So.2d 913 (La.App. 5th Cir.1985), writ denied 481 So.2d 636 (La.1986); State v. Jones, 517 So.2d 402 (La.App. 5th Cir.1987), writ denied 522 So.2d 560 (La.1988); State v. Robert, 518 So.2d 1169 (La.App. 5th Cir.1988); State v. Jackson, 519 So.2d 254 (La.App. 5th Cir.1988); State v. Davenport, 520 So.2d 463 (La.App. 5th Cir.1988); and State v. Weilbaecher, 520 So.2d 456 (La.App. 5th Cir. 1988), a line of decisions by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal which hold that in order for a conviction and sentence to be effective there must be a judgment signed	1	1988–1988
State v. Jones green la · 1988 1 sentence 1988Applicant relies on State v. Jennings, 478 So.2d 913 (La.App. 5th Cir.1985), writ denied 481 So.2d 636 (La.1986); State v. Jones, 517 So.2d 402 (La.App. 5th Cir.1987), writ denied 522 So.2d 560 (La.1988); State v. Robert, 518 So.2d 1169 (La.App. 5th Cir.1988); State v. Jackson, 519 So.2d 254 (La.App. 5th Cir.1988); State v. Davenport, 520 So.2d 463 (La.App. 5th Cir.1988); and State v. Weilbaecher, 520 So.2d 456 (La.App. 5th Cir. 1988), a line of decisions by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal which hold that in order for a conviction and sentence to be effective there must be a judgment signed	1	1988–1988
State v. Robert green lactapp · 1988 1 sentence 1988Applicant relies on State v. Jennings, 478 So.2d 913 (La.App. 5th Cir.1985), writ denied 481 So.2d 636 (La.1986); State v. Jones, 517 So.2d 402 (La.App. 5th Cir.1987), writ denied 522 So.2d 560 (La.1988); State v. Robert, 518 So.2d 1169 (La.App. 5th Cir.1988); State v. Jackson, 519 So.2d 254 (La.App. 5th Cir.1988); State v. Davenport, 520 So.2d 463 (La.App. 5th Cir.1988); and State v. Weilbaecher, 520 So.2d 456 (La.App. 5th Cir. 1988), a line of decisions by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal which hold that in order for a conviction and sentence to be effective there must be a judgment signed	1	1988–1988
cluster 260810 green cadc · 1963 1 sentence 1972Hyser v. Reed, 115 U.S.App.D.C. 254 , 318 F.2d 225 (1963).	1	1972–1972
cluster 295054 neutral ca5 · 1971	1	1972–1972
Hyser v. Reed green cadc · 1963	1	1972–1972
Mempa v. Rhay green scotus · 1967	1	1970–1970

Statutes the citing opinions construe

LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 40:967 (4) LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 14:27 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

TX 299 (1971–2026) IN 271 (1973–2025) CA 253 (1968–2026) TN 165 (1980–2026) FL 164 (1966–2026) IL 149 (1969–2026) AL 130 (1970–2026) PA 128 (1973–2026) OH 121 (1963–2026) NC 113 (1979–2026) CT 98 (1987–2026) RI 83 (1974–2024) GA 63 (1972–2026) NM 59 (1995–2026) MA 57 (1979–2026) MO 55 (1978–2024) OR 52 (1971–2025) KS 47 (1980–2025) SC 46 (1981–2023) MD 41 (1968–2025) MI 40 (1972–2024) VA 34 (1985–2025) MN 33 (1984–2024) CO 31 (1974–2025) ID 30 (1967–2025) VT 30 (1986–2025) KY 28 (1979–2026) WA 28 (1972–2024) AZ 28 (1973–2026) NY 24 (1970–2025) LA 23 (1970–2025) AK 23 (1973–2023) WY 19 (1985–2026) WV 18 (1976–2025) UT 17 (1991–2025) WI 17 (1971–2015) MT 17 (1989–2024) NV 14 (1968–2021) DC 14 (1983–2015) AR 14 (1991–2024) MS 14 (1994–2020) IA 13 (1976–2026) HI 10 (1980–2021) ME 10 (1985–2025) ND 10 (1978–2025) NE 10 (1988–2024) NJ 6 (1982–2002) NH 6 (1996–2011) SD 5 (1988–2024) DE 3 (1968–2018)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check