10 Nebraska opinions name it 2 courts 1988–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Nebraska courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Houstongreen1 sentence2020In addition, the parolee or probationer has a right to the assistance of counsel in some circumstances where the parolee’s or probationer’s version of a disputed issue can fairly be represented only by a trained advocate. - 700 - Nebraska Court of Appeals Advance Sheets 28 Nebraska Appellate Reports STATE v. HOUSTON Cite as 28 Neb. | 1 | 1 |
Minnesota v. Murphygreen2 sentences2014See, e.g., Minnesota v. Murphy, 465 U.S. 420 , 104 S. Ct. 1136 , 79 L. 2014See, e.g., Minnesota v. Murphy, 465 U.S. 420 , 104 S. Ct. 1136 , 79 L. | 1 | 1 |
In Interest of Doegreen2 sentences1995See In re Jane Doe, 62 Haw. 70 , 610 P.2d 509 (1980). 1995See In re Jane Doe, 62 Haw. 70 , 610 P.2d 509 (1980). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nebraska. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In Re Interest of Rebecca B.
green
2 sentences2020In re Interest of Rebecca B., 280 Neb. 137 , 783 N.W.2d 783 (2010). 2020In re Interest of Rebecca B., 280 Neb. 137 , 783 N.W.2d 783 (2010). | 3 | 2013–2020 |
State v. Galvan (supplemental opinion)
green
1 sentence2024Id. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
State v. Galvan
green
2 sentences2020State v. Galvan, 305 Neb. 513 , 941 N.W.2d 183 (2020). 2020State v. Galvan, 305 Neb. 513 , 941 N.W.2d 183 (2020). | 1 | 2020–2020 |
State v. Schreiner
green
2 sentences2013In re Interest of Rebecca B., 280 Neb. 137 , 783 N.W.2d 783 (2010); State v. Schreiner, 276 Neb. 393 , 754 N.W.2d 742 (2008); State v. Schuetz, 18 Neb. 2013In re Interest of Rebecca B., 280 Neb. 137 , 783 N.W.2d 783 (2010); State v. Schreiner, 276 Neb. 393 , 754 N.W.2d 742 (2008); State v. Schuetz, 18 Neb. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Commonwealth v. Ruff
green
2 sentences1993In Commonwealth v. Ruff, 272 Pa. Super. 50 , 414 A.2d 663 (1979), the Pennsylvania Superior Court stated that a certain amount of prejudice necessarily follows from a probation revocation which takes place after the probationary period expires and that this prejudice renders a delay in holding the probation revocation hearing unreasonable when it is conjoined with other factors such as a lack of diligence by law enforcement officials. 1993In Commonwealth v. Ruff, 272 Pa. Super. 50 , 414 A.2d 663 (1979), the Pennsylvania Superior Court stated that a certain amount of prejudice necessarily follows from a probation revocation which takes place after the probationary period expires and that this prejudice renders a delay in holding the probation revocation hearing unreasonable when it is conjoined with other factors such as a lack of diligence by law enforcement officials. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Scott v. Illinois
green
2 sentences1988Ed. 2d 656 (1973), held that the appointment of counsel for indigent probationers at a probation revocation hearing must be determined on a case-by-case basis. (4) Scott v. Illinois, 440 U.S. 367 , 99 S. Ct. 1158 , 59 L. 1988Ed. 2d 656 (1973), held that the appointment of counsel for indigent probationers at a probation revocation hearing must be determined on a case-by-case basis. (4) Scott v. Illinois, 440 U.S. 367 , 99 S. Ct. 1158 , 59 L. | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.