21 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 1975–2025 5 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Meier v. SENECAUT IIIgreen2 sentences2024See Meier v. Senecaut, 641 N.W.2d 532, 537 (Iowa 2002) (“It is a fundamental doctrine of appellate review that issues must ordinarily be both raised and decided by the district court before we will decide them on appeal.”). 2014“It is a fundamental doctrine of appellate review that issues must ordinarily be both raised and decided by the district court before we will decide them on appeal.” Meier v. Senecaut, 641 N.W.2d 532, 537 (Iowa 2002). | 2 | 2 |
City of Sioux City v. Fairbanksgreen2 sentences2010In re Fairbanks, 287 N.W.2d 579 , *863 582 (Iowa 1980). 2010In re Fairbanks, 287 N.W.2d 579, 582 (Iowa 1980). | 1 | 2 |
Hyler v. Garnergreen1 sentence2021See Hyler v. Garner, 548 N.W.2d 864, 876 (Iowa 1996). | 1 | 1 |
Bingaman v. Rosenbohmgreen1 sentence2020See, e.g., Bingaman v. Rosenbohm, 288 N.W. 900, 901 (Iowa 1939) (“As to the obligation to procure a substitution of parties-plaintiff, it would seem to require no argument to show that if interven[o]r was to take a valid decree against anyone, such person must be brought into court. | 1 | 1 |
State of Iowa v. Johnnie Ray Steigergreen1 sentence2018See State v. Steiger, 903 N.W.2d 169, 170 (Iowa 2017) (reversing the judgment 13 and sentences for failure to comply with Harrington despite the lack of error preservation because “the error preservation rule . . . established in Harrington was not in existence at the time” of the colloquy). | 1 | 1 |
State v. O'CONNELLgreen1 sentence2017See State v. O’Connell, 275 N.W.2d 197, 206 (Iowa 1979) (noting ineffective-assistance claims should be preserved for postconviction-relief proceedings to allow defendant’s counsel an opportunity to rebut the allegations). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Allengreen1 sentence2016See State v. Allen, 402 N.W.2d 438, 441 (Iowa 1987) (“We have stated that probation revocation can be challenged only by application for postconviction relief and not by direct appeal.”). 3 The premised error is based solely on the court’s lack of inquiry—the lack of a question from the court to Vos regarding whether the medication affected his ability to comprehend. | 1 | 1 |
Lynn G. Lamasters Vs. State of Iowagreen1 sentence2015See Lamasters v. State, 821 N.W.2d 856, 864 (Iowa 2012) (holding that, for error to be preserved, the issue must be presented to the district court, which must then rule on the issue). | 1 | 1 |
Edge v. Harshagreen1 sentence2014See Edge v. Harsha, 334 N.W.2d 741, 742 (Iowa 1983) (finding an appeal bond maintains the status quo and keeps a creditor at bay until the appeal is decided but the bond does not deprive the judgment of its force). | 1 | 1 |
Securities And Exchange Commission v. Thestreet.Comgreen1 sentence2009See S.E.C. v. TheStreet.com, 273 F.3d 222 , 229 n.7 (2d Cir. 2001) (affirming that although some courts have incorrectly concluded the Martindell rule applies only when the government seeks modification of a protective order, the Martindell “extraordinary circumstances” test applies when any third party seeks to modify a protective order). 8 Other circuits that have considered the issue have applied standards more amenable to modification of protective orders. | 1 | 1 |
Balder v. Haleygreen1 sentence1999See Balder v. Haley, 399 N.W.2d 77, 81-82 (Minn.1987) (holding no causal relationship existed between injury and failure to warn as a matter of law when plaintiff was aware of danger presented). | 1 | 1 |
Daly v. Illinois Central Railroad Companygreen2 sentences1979In Daly v. Illinois Central Railroad, 250 Iowa 110, 114 , 93 N.W.2d 68, 71 (1958), we said that: [N]o amount of speed of a railroad train is in and of itself negligence except where regulated by statutes or ordinance. 1979In Daly v. Illinois Central Railroad, 250 Iowa 110, 114 , 93 N.W.2d 68, 71 (1958), we said that: [N]o amount of speed of a railroad train is in and of itself negligence except where regulated by statutes or ordinance. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State Ex Rel. City of Aventura v. Jimenez
green
2 sentences2019While it might have been preferable if the initial screening decision by Gatso were subject to a transparent regulatory framework, as in Jimenez I, 211 So. 3d 158 , we do not think the lack of such a framework undermines the ministerial character of the initial screening decisions by Gatso. 2019While it might have been preferable if the initial screening decision by Gatso were subject to a transparent regulatory framework, as in Jimenez I , 211 So.3d 158 , we do not think the lack of such a framework undermines the ministerial character of the initial screening decisions by Gatso. | 3 | 2018–2019 |
KFC Corporation Vs. Iowa Department Of Revenue
green
1 sentence2025His argument that he could not have anticipated the commissioner’s failure to rule on the issue is not a compelling justification for a lack of error preservation when he still had the opportunity to move for rehearing following the commissioner’s final ruling. “[W]e decline to entertain issues not ruled upon by an agency when the aggrieved party failed to follow available procedures to alert the agency of the issue.” KFC, 792 N.W.2d at 329 . | 1 | 2025–2025 |
State v. Maxwell
green
1 sentence2025Unfortunately, State v. Maxwell, 743 N.W.2d 185 (Iowa 2008) directs us to do just that. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Yee v. City of Escondido
green
1 sentence2023This is because “[t]here is no procedural rule solely dedicated to the preservation of error doctrine.” Id. at 539 . | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Martindell v. International Telephone And Telegraph Corporation
green
1 sentence2009Id. at 296 . ____________________________ of the appropriate standard to apply when modifying a protective order because of the lack of analysis in the Tratchel decision. 11 Although the language quoted above, and much of the rest of the opinion, suggests the stringent “extraordinary circumstances” test applies only when the government seeks to circumvent the Fifth Amendment rights of suspects in a criminal investigation by accessing confidential depositions taken in a civil case, the Second Circuit has since made clear it will apply the same standard in other contexts as well. | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Davis v. North Carolina
green
2 sentences1975The lack of waiver cannot be equated with involuntariness as defined in Davis v. North Carolina, 384 U.S. 737 , 86 S.Ct. 1761 , 16 L.Ed.2d 895 . 1975The lack of waiver cannot be equated with involuntariness as defined in Davis v. North Carolina, 384 U.S. 737 , 86 S.Ct. 1761 , 16 L.Ed.2d 895 . | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.