8 Wyoming opinions name it 1 courts 1986–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Wyoming courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Byrd v. Mahaffeygreen2 sentences2019Ms. Conzelman claims that the denial of the continuance violated her due process rights and that the lack of a hearing on her motion resulted in prejudice. [¶11] We have frequently addressed the issue of a continuance after a party replaces their counsel or after an attorney withdraws. “[I]n civil cases, withdrawal of counsel does not always provide grounds for the granting of a continuance.” Byrd v. Mahaffey, 2003 WY 137, ¶ 6 , 78 P.3d 671, 673 (Wyo. 2003) (citations omitted). 2019Ms. Conzelman claims that the denial of the continuance violated her due process rights and that the lack of a hearing on her motion resulted in prejudice. [¶11] We have frequently addressed the issue of a continuance after a party replaces their counsel or after an attorney withdraws. “[I]n civil cases, withdrawal of counsel does not always provide grounds for the granting of a continuance.” Byrd v. Mahaffey, 2003 WY 137, ¶ 6 , 78 P.3d 671, 673 (Wyo. 2003) (citations omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Shanor v. Engineering, Inc. of Wyominggreen1 sentence2019Even if a party requests a continuance based on the withdrawal of counsel, “[a] party moving for a continuance must show good cause for doing so.” Shanor v. Eng’g, Inc. of Wyo., 705 P.2d 858, 861 (Wyo. 1985). | 1 | 1 |
Worcester v. Stategreen1 sentence2017See Worcester, ¶ 21, 30 P.3d at 54 . | 1 | 1 |
Mikesell v. Watermangreen1 sentence2015Elrod, supra, § 3:32; Mikesell v. Waterman, 197 P.3d 184, 187 (Alaska 2008) (appellant must identify contested facts material to the inconvenient forum issue that, due to the lack of a hearing, he could not put before the trial court). . | 1 | 1 |
Billis v. Stategreen1 sentence2008Schultz v. State, 2007 WY 162, ¶ 19 , 169 P.3d 81, 87 (Wyo.2007); Pena v. State, 2004 WY 115 , ¶ 44 n. 7, 98 P.3d 857 , 874 n. 7 (Wyo.2004); Doyle v. State, 954 P.2d 969, 975 (Wyo.1998); Billis v. State, 800 P.2d 401, 433-34 (Wyo.1990). | 1 | 1 |
Schultz v. Stategreen2 sentences2008Schultz v. State, 2007 WY 162, ¶ 19 , 169 P.3d 81, 87 (Wyo.2007); Pena v. State, 2004 WY 115 , ¶ 44 n. 7, 98 P.3d 857 , 874 n. 7 (Wyo.2004); Doyle v. State, 954 P.2d 969, 975 (Wyo.1998); Billis v. State, 800 P.2d 401, 433-34 (Wyo.1990). 2008Schultz v. State, 2007 WY 162, ¶ 19 , 169 P.3d 81, 87 (Wyo.2007); Pena v. State, 2004 WY 115 , ¶ 44 n. 7, 98 P.3d 857 , 874 n. 7 (Wyo.2004); Doyle v. State, 954 P.2d 969, 975 (Wyo.1998); Billis v. State, 800 P.2d 401, 433-34 (Wyo.1990). | 1 | 1 |
Doyle v. Stategreen1 sentence2008Schultz v. State, 2007 WY 162, ¶ 19 , 169 P.3d 81, 87 (Wyo.2007); Pena v. State, 2004 WY 115 , ¶ 44 n. 7, 98 P.3d 857 , 874 n. 7 (Wyo.2004); Doyle v. State, 954 P.2d 969, 975 (Wyo.1998); Billis v. State, 800 P.2d 401, 433-34 (Wyo.1990). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Wyoming. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Herring v. Welltech, Inc.
green
2 sentences1986Because there was no dispute as to the employees' rights to compensation, Apollo's reliance on Herring v. Welltech, Inc., Wyo., 660 P.2d 361 (1983), is misplaced. 1986Because there was no dispute as to the employees’ rights to compensation, Apollo’s reliance on Herring v. Welltech, Inc., Wyo., 660 P.2d 361 (1983), is misplaced. | 2 | 1986–1986 |
In the Matter of the Guardianship and Conservatorship of William G. Bratton, Ward, Robert E. Bratton
green
1 sentence2015We therefore decline to certify that he had no reasonable cause for his appeal, and we deny the request for sanctions." In Bratton II, ¶ 8 n. 1, 344 P.3d at 258 n. 1 we wrote: In Bratton II, Due to the inadequacies of Mr. Bratton's brief, including the lack of a standard of review and citation to authority, Ms. Blenkinsop requests that we certify that there was no reasonable cause for this appeal and award her costs and attorney fees under Rule 10.05 of the Wyoming Rules of Appellate Procedure. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Peña v. State
green
1 sentence2008Schultz v. State, 2007 WY 162, ¶ 19 , 169 P.3d 81, 87 (Wyo.2007); Pena v. State, 2004 WY 115 , ¶ 44 n. 7, 98 P.3d 857 , 874 n. 7 (Wyo.2004); Doyle v. State, 954 P.2d 969, 975 (Wyo.1998); Billis v. State, 800 P.2d 401, 433-34 (Wyo.1990). | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Pena v. State
green
1 sentence2008Schultz v. State, 2007 WY 162, ¶ 19 , 169 P.3d 81, 87 (Wyo.2007); Pena v. State, 2004 WY 115 , ¶ 44 n. 7, 98 P.3d 857 , 874 n. 7 (Wyo.2004); Doyle v. State, 954 P.2d 969, 975 (Wyo.1998); Billis v. State, 800 P.2d 401, 433-34 (Wyo.1990). | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Thronson v. Thronson
green
2 sentences1995The case of Thronson v. Thronson, 810 P.2d 428 (Utah App.1991), cert. denied, 826 P.2d 651 (Utah 1991), discussed the problem: Custody Terminology: Many legislators, judges and writers have been loose with their "joint" custody language. 1995The case of Thronson v. Thronson, 810 P.2d 428 (Utah App.1991), cert. denied, 826 P.2d 651 (Utah 1991), discussed the problem: Custody Terminology: Many legislators, judges and writers have been loose with their "joint” custody language. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.