19 Kansas opinions name it 2 courts 1906–2024 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Wardgreen2 sentences2012See Ward, 292 Kan. 541 , Syl. ¶¶ 5-6. 2012State v. Ward, 292 Kan. 541, 565 , 256 P.3d 801 (2011), cert. denied February 21,2012. | 2 | 3 |
Hunt, Governor of North Carolina v. Cromartiegreen2 sentences2022The court failed to conduct the appropriate "'sensitive inquiry'" to assess whether plaintiffs "managed to disentangle race from politics and prove that the former drove a district's lines." Cooper, 137 S. Ct. at 1473 ; 46 see also Easley, 532 U.S. at 245 ("A legislature trying to secure a safe Democratic seat is interested in Democratic voting behavior. 2022The court failed to conduct the appropriate "'sensitive inquiry'" to assess whether plaintiffs "managed to disentangle race from politics and prove that the former drove a district's lines." Cooper, 137 S. Ct. at 1473 ; 46 see also Easley, 532 U.S. at 245 ("A legislature trying to secure a safe Democratic seat is interested in Democratic voting behavior. | 2 | 2 |
Osha Data/cih, Inc. v. United States Department of Laborgreen1 sentence2021Walsh v. U.S. Dep't of Veterans Affairs, 400 F.3d 535, 537 (7th Cir. 2005) (rejecting application of the capable-of-repetition-yet- evading-review exception to FOIA claim because plaintiff failed to establish he would "request additional documents and that the VA will again fail to produce them in a timely manner"); OSHA Data/CIH, Inc. v. U.S. Dep't of Labor, 220 F.3d 153, 168 (3d Cir. 2000) ("OSHA Data has the burden of meeting both parts of the following test: '[1] the challenged action was in its duration too short to be fully litigated prior to its cessation or expiration, and [2] there wa | 1 | 1 |
Dennis R. Walsh v. United States Department of Veterans Affairsgreen1 sentence2021Walsh v. U.S. Dep't of Veterans Affairs, 400 F.3d 535, 537 (7th Cir. 2005) (rejecting application of the capable-of-repetition-yet- evading-review exception to FOIA claim because plaintiff failed to establish he would "request additional documents and that the VA will again fail to produce them in a timely manner"); OSHA Data/CIH, Inc. v. U.S. Dep't of Labor, 220 F.3d 153, 168 (3d Cir. 2000) ("OSHA Data has the burden of meeting both parts of the following test: '[1] the challenged action was in its duration too short to be fully litigated prior to its cessation or expiration, and [2] there wa | 1 | 1 |
State v. Shaddengreen2 sentences2011See State v. Shadden, 290 Kan. 803, 818 , 235 P.3d 436 (2010); Armstrong v. City of Wichita, 21 Kan.App.2d 750 , Syl. ¶ 3, 907 P.2d 923 (1995), rev. denied 259 Kan. 927 (1996). 2011See State v. Shadden, 290 Kan. 803, 818 , 235 P.3d 436 (2010); Armstrong v. City of Wichita, 21 Kan.App.2d 750 , Syl. ¶ 3, 907 P.2d 923 (1995), rev. denied 259 Kan. 927 (1996). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Frye v. United States
red
2 sentences2003In Shively, 268 Kan. at 575-76 , we further stated: “The general acceptance test of Frye governs the admissibility of expert scientific evidence in Kansas in those situations wherein such a test or standard is required. [Citation omitted.] As explained in State v. Warden, 257 Kan. 94, 108 , 891 P.2d 1074 (1995): ‘The general rule enunciated in Frye prohibits expert testimony concerning a scientific principle or discovery unless the principle is “sufficiently established to have gained general acceptance in the particular field in which it belongs.” Frye, 293 F. at 1014 . 1999The general acceptance test governing the admissibility of scientific evidence in Kansas where a test or standard is required is set forth in Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 .(D.C. | 3 | 1997–2003 |
State v. Armstrong
green
2 sentences1997State v. Armstrong, 240 Kan. 446, 459 , 731 P.2d 249 , cert. denied 482 U.S. 929 (1987). 1997State v. Armstrong, 240 Kan. 446, 459 , 731 P.2d 249 , cert. denied 482 U.S. 929 (1987). | 3 | 1991–1997 |
Cooper v. Harris
green
2 sentences2022The court failed to conduct the appropriate "'sensitive inquiry'" to assess whether plaintiffs "managed to disentangle race from politics and prove that the former drove a district's lines." Cooper, 137 S. Ct. at 1473 ; 46 see also Easley, 532 U.S. at 245 ("A legislature trying to secure a safe Democratic seat is interested in Democratic voting behavior. 2022The court failed to conduct the appropriate "'sensitive inquiry'" to assess whether plaintiffs "managed to disentangle race from politics and prove that the former drove a district's lines." Cooper, 137 S. Ct. at 1473 ; 46 see also Easley, 532 U.S. at 245 ("A legislature trying to secure a safe Democratic seat is interested in Democratic voting behavior. | 2 | 2022–2022 |
Seymour v. United States
green
2 sentences2012Ed. 2d 705 , reh. denied 386 U.S. 987 (1967), the test is whether the error affected substantial rights, meaning whether die error affected the outcome of die trial. 2011Ed. 2d 705 , reh. denied 386 U.S. 987 (1967), the test is whether an error affected substantial rights, meaning whether the error affected the outcome of the trial. | 2 | 2011–2012 |
Armstrong v. City of Wichita
green
2 sentences2011See State v. Shadden, 290 Kan. 803, 818 , 235 P.3d 436 (2010); Armstrong v. City of Wichita, 21 Kan.App.2d 750 , Syl. ¶ 3, 907 P.2d 923 (1995), rev. denied 259 Kan. 927 (1996). 2011See State v. Shadden, 290 Kan. 803, 818 , 235 P.3d 436 (2010); Armstrong v. City of Wichita, 21 Kan.App.2d 750 , Syl. ¶ 3, 907 P.2d 923 (1995), rev. denied 259 Kan. 927 (1996). | 2 | 1997–2011 |
State v. Isley
green
2 sentences2009State v. Isley, 262 Kan. 281 , Syl. ¶ 1, 936 P.2d 275 (1997). 2009State v. Isley, 262 Kan. 281 , Syl. ¶ 1, 936 P.2d 275 (1997). | 2 | 2000–2009 |
City of Arlington v. Byrd
green
2 sentences1997State v. Armstrong, 240 Kan. 446, 459 , 731 P.2d 249 , cert. denied 482 U.S. 929 (1987). 1991State v. Armstrong, 240 Kan. 446, 459 , 731 P.2d 249 , cert. denied 482 U.S. 929 (1987). | 2 | 1991–1997 |
State v. Tully
green
2 sentences2024State v. Tully, 293 Kan. 176, 193 , 262 P.3d 314 (2011) (criminal); Foster v. Klaumann, 296 Kan. 295, 305 , 294 P.3d 223 (2013) (civil). 2024State v. Tully, 293 Kan. 176, 193 , 262 P.3d 314 (2011) (criminal); Foster v. Klaumann, 296 Kan. 295, 305 , 294 P.3d 223 (2013) (civil). | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Foster ex rel. Foster v. Klaumann
green
2 sentences2024State v. Tully, 293 Kan. 176, 193 , 262 P.3d 314 (2011) (criminal); Foster v. Klaumann, 296 Kan. 295, 305 , 294 P.3d 223 (2013) (civil). 2024State v. Tully, 293 Kan. 176, 193 , 262 P.3d 314 (2011) (criminal); Foster v. Klaumann, 296 Kan. 295, 305 , 294 P.3d 223 (2013) (civil). | 1 | 2024–2024 |
State v. Corbett
green
2 sentences2012Marshall argues the test for this analysis was stated in State v. Corbett, 281 Kan. 294, 305 , 130 P.3d 1179 (2006). 2012Marshall argues the test for this analysis was stated in State v. Corbett, 281 Kan. 294, 305 , 130 P.3d 1179 (2006). | 1 | 2012–2012 |
State v. Warden
green
2 sentences2003In Shively, 268 Kan. at 575-76 , we further stated: “The general acceptance test of Frye governs the admissibility of expert scientific evidence in Kansas in those situations wherein such a test or standard is required. [Citation omitted.] As explained in State v. Warden, 257 Kan. 94, 108 , 891 P.2d 1074 (1995): ‘The general rule enunciated in Frye prohibits expert testimony concerning a scientific principle or discovery unless the principle is “sufficiently established to have gained general acceptance in the particular field in which it belongs.” Frye, 293 F. at 1014 . 2003In Shively, 268 Kan. at 575-76 , we further stated: “The general acceptance test of Frye governs the admissibility of expert scientific evidence in Kansas in those situations wherein such a test or standard is required. [Citation omitted.] As explained in State v. Warden, 257 Kan. 94, 108 , 891 P.2d 1074 (1995): ‘The general rule enunciated in Frye prohibits expert testimony concerning a scientific principle or discovery unless the principle is “sufficiently established to have gained general acceptance in the particular field in which it belongs.” Frye, 293 F. at 1014 . | 1 | 2003–2003 |
State v. Shively
green
1 sentence2003In Shively, 268 Kan. at 575-76 , we further stated: “The general acceptance test of Frye governs the admissibility of expert scientific evidence in Kansas in those situations wherein such a test or standard is required. [Citation omitted.] As explained in State v. Warden, 257 Kan. 94, 108 , 891 P.2d 1074 (1995): ‘The general rule enunciated in Frye prohibits expert testimony concerning a scientific principle or discovery unless the principle is “sufficiently established to have gained general acceptance in the particular field in which it belongs.” Frye, 293 F. at 1014 . | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Honig v. Doe
neutral
1 sentence1991State v. Armstrong, 240 Kan. 446, 459 , 731 P.2d 249 , cert. denied 482 U.S. 926 (1987). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Hoyt v. Union National Bank of Wichita
green
1 sentence1925The test rule that there is no equitable mortgage relationship existing between the grantors and grantees of a deed unless the status of debtor and creditor is involved therewith is perfectly sound (Hoyt v. National Bank, 115 Kan. 167 , 222 Pac. 27 ), but certainly a deed of conveyance may have the attributes of an equitable mortgage if the parties intend that the relation of debtor and creditor shall be created between them as a pertinent incident thereto. | 1 | 1925–1925 |
Monroig Obrador v. Monroig Obrador
neutral
1 sentence1906(Railway Co. v. Posten, 59 Kan. 449, 453 , 53 Pac. 465 ; Railway Co. v. Scheinkoenig, 62 Kan. 57 , 61 Pac. 414 .) The theory of the law is that those who inherit from the deceased acquire his property and investments, and are enabled to secure for themselves the ordinary income therefrom. | 1 | 1906–1906 |
Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. Posten
neutral
1 sentence1906(Railway Co. v. Posten, 59 Kan. 449, 453 , 53 Pac. 465 ; Railway Co. v. Scheinkoenig, 62 Kan. 57 , 61 Pac. 414 .) The theory of the law is that those who inherit from the deceased acquire his property and investments, and are enabled to secure for themselves the ordinary income therefrom. | 1 | 1906–1906 |
Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. Scheinkoenig
neutral
2 sentences1906(Railway Co. v. Posten, 59 Kan. 449, 453 , 53 Pac. 465 ; Railway Co. v. Scheinkoenig, 62 Kan. 57 , 61 Pac. 414 .) The theory of the law is that those who inherit from the deceased acquire his property and investments, and are enabled to secure for themselves the ordinary income therefrom. 1906(Railway Co. v. Posten, 59 Kan. 449, 453 , 53 Pac. 465 ; Railway Co. v. Scheinkoenig, 62 Kan. 57 , 61 Pac. 414 .) The theory of the law is that those who inherit from the deceased acquire his property and investments, and are enabled to secure for themselves the ordinary income therefrom. | 1 | 1906–1906 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.