position claim in Iowa

2024Id. at 1093–94.

2024Id. at 1093–94.

2023The In re G.G. court also emphasized the circularity problem inherent in allowing self-representation in an involuntary commitment hearing: [A] mental health patient who represents him or herself and who is adjudicated in need of commitment or medication would then be in a position to challenge the initial waiver of counsel as not knowing, intelligent or voluntary and thereby claiming a right to a new hearing with counsel. 165 A.3d at 1090 .

2001Admin., 82 F.3d 16 , 21 (2d Cir.1996) (holding that transfer from “elite” division, “which provided prestige and opportunity for advancement to a less prestigious unit, with little opportunity for professional growth” constituted adverse employment - action even though units were equal in status); Goodwin v. Cir. Ct., 729 F.2d 541 , 547 (8th Cir.1984) (holding that a transfer, with the same pay, from a position as a hearing officer to that of a staff attorney was adverse because the new position was less prestigious). *864 Adverse employment action can occur even when the alleged action happen

2001Admin., 82 F.3d 16 , 21 (2d Cir.1996) (holding that transfer from “elite” division, “which provided prestige and opportunity for advancement to a less prestigious unit, with little opportunity for professional growth” constituted adverse employment - action even though units were equal in status); Goodwin v. Cir. Ct., 729 F.2d 541 , 547 (8th Cir.1984) (holding that a transfer, with the same pay, from a position as a hearing officer to that of a staff attorney was adverse because the new position was less prestigious). *864 Adverse employment action can occur even when the alleged action happen

1989Id.

1980State v. Beckner, 197 Iowa 1252, 1254 , 198 N.W. 643 , 644 (1924).

1966In struggling with the confusion raised by this doctrine we have noted: “This is an ordinary case of negligence and contributory negligence and the matter of assumption of risk should not be injected into the case.” Holmes v. Gross, 250 Iowa 238, 251 , 93 N.W.2d 714 .

1966In struggling with the confusion raised by this doctrine we have noted: “This is an ordinary case of negligence and contributory negligence and the matter of assumption of risk should not be injected into the case.” Holmes v. Gross, 250 Iowa 238, 251 , 93 N.W.2d 714 .

1965It seems to be generally recognized that as to such expenditures the spé-cifie legacy is adeemed pro tanto.” *600 In addition to In re Estate of Bierstedt and Walsh v. Gillespie, both supra, plaintiff cites Buder v. Stocke, 343 Mo. 506 , 121 S.W.2d 852 (also cited in Bierstedt and Walsh), in support of her.princii>al contention.

1965It seems to be generally recognized that as to such expenditures the spé-cifie legacy is adeemed pro tanto.” *600 In addition to In re Estate of Bierstedt and Walsh v. Gillespie, both supra, plaintiff cites Buder v. Stocke, 343 Mo. 506 , 121 S.W.2d 852 (also cited in Bierstedt and Walsh), in support of her.princii>al contention.

1936The idea is: ‘I may get something, or I may not. ’ This court, in the cases cited, has many times said that the holder of the quitclaim deed takes it with notice of prior equities.” And in the case of Duntz v. Ames Cemetery Association, 192 Iowa 1341 , at page 1345, 186 N. W. 443 , 445, this court said: “The defendant city is not in a position to claim that, in the absence of an express undertaking, the assignee of a written contract is not held to have assumed the obligations of the assignor.

1931Unless, therefore, the plaintiff can establish its ownership of the property on grounds other than legislative enactment, it is in no position to challenge the power of the legislature to change such enactment. * * * The legislature having opened up this new source of revenue, the state necessarily has the incidental power to receive its fruit in such manner as the legislature shall provide. * * * We hold, therefore, that plaintiff’s alleged ownership of the ‘interest’ is such only as is conferred upon it by legislation, and that, as to future benefits, it is necessarily subject to later legis

1927Chantland v. Sherman, 148 Iowa 352 , and cases cited; Newman v. French, 138 Iowa 482; Campbell v. Dunkelberger, 172 Iowa 385 .

1927Chantland v. Sherman, 148 Iowa 352 , and cases cited; Newman v. French, 138 Iowa 482; Campbell v. Dunkelberger, 172 Iowa 385 .

1927Chantland v. Sherman, 148 Iowa 352 , and cases cited; Newman v. French, 138 Iowa 482; Campbell v. Dunkelberger, 172 Iowa 385 .

1926Crooke v. Nelson, 195 Iowa 681 ; Alabama Tailoring Co. v. Judkins, 205 Ala. 601 ( 88 So. 865 ); Aikman v. Sanborn, 5 Cal. Unrep.

1926Crooke v. Nelson, 195 Iowa 681 ; Alabama Tailoring Co. v. Judkins, 205 Ala. 601 ( 88 So. 865 ); Aikman v. Sanborn, 5 Cal. Unrep.

1926Crooke v. Nelson, 195 Iowa 681 ; Alabama Tailoring Co. v. Judkins, 205 Ala. 601 ( 88 So. 865 ) ; Aikman v. Sanborn, 5 Cal. Unrep.

1926Crooke v. Nelson, 195 Iowa 681 ; Alabama Tailoring Co. v. Judkins, 205 Ala. 601 ( 88 So. 865 ); Aikman v. Sanborn, 5 Cal. Unrep.

1922State v. Congrove, 109 Iowa 66 .

1919We think, too, that Muir v. Bozarth, 44 Iowa 499, strongly tends to support the position that the claim for rent is barred, so far as more than five years’ use of the premises is concerned.