15 Arkansas opinions name it 2 courts 1989–2025 8 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arkansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Pearson v. Callahangreen2 sentences2021Banks v. Jones, 2019 Ark. 204 , 575 S.W.3d 111 (citing Pearson v. Callahan, 555 U.S. 223 (2009)). 2019See Pearson v. Callahan , 555 U.S. 223 , 232, 129 S.Ct. 808 , 172 L.Ed.2d 565 (2009). | 1 | 2 |
Rainey v. Hartnessgreen2 sentences2014See Rainey v. Hartness, 339 Ark. 293 , 5 S.W.3d 410 (1999). 2014See Rainey v. Hartness, 339 Ark. 293 , 5 S.W.3d 410 (1999). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arkansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Malik Muntaqim, Adc 088633 v. Wendy Kelley, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
green
2 sentences2025Id. 2024Id., 641 S.W.3d at 42 . | 3 | 2024–2025 |
Early v. Crockett
green
2 sentences2021Early v. Crockett, 2014 Ark. 278 , 436 S.W.3d 141 . 2021Early v. Crockett, 2014 Ark. 278 , 436 S.W.3d 141 . | 2 | 2019–2021 |
Morris Koontz v. Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Division of Correction; Dale Reed, Deputy Director, Arkansas Division of Correction; William Straughn, Deputy Director, Arkansas Division of Correction; Randy Watson, Warden, Arkansas Division of Correction; Jeremy Andrews, Deputy Warden, Arkansas Division of Correction; Gaylon Lay, Warden, Arkansas Division of Correction; James Dycus, Deputy Warden, Arkansas Division of Correction; And Anthony Jackson, Deputy Warden, Arkansas Division of Correction
neutral
1 sentence2025Therefore, Brown “is entitled to qualified immunity unless (1) [appellants have] alleged facts that demonstrate the deprivation of an actual constitutional right, and (2) the right was clearly established at the time of the alleged violation such that a reasonable official would have known that his actions were unlawful.” Koontz, 2025 Ark. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Malik Muntaqim v. Dexter Payne and Wendy Kelley, Directors, Arkansas Department of Correction; Anthony Jackson, Deputy Warden of the Ouachita River Correctional Unit; Steve Outlaw, Deputy Warden; Chris Menotti, Sergeant; Willie Moore, Chaplain; Dan Flora, Chaplain; James Gibson, Warden of the Varner Supermax Unit; And Virginia Allen, Mailroom Supervisor, All in Their Individual and Official Capacities
green
2 sentences2022Id., 628 S.W.3d at 635 . 2022Id., 628 S.W.3d at 635 . | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Jegley v. Picado
green
2 sentences2021Id. at 9, 388 S.W.3d at 434 (citing Jegley, 349 Ark. at 632 , 80 S.W.3d at 350 ). 2021Id. at 9, 388 S.W.3d at 434 (citing Jegley, 349 Ark. at 632 , 80 S.W.3d at 350 ). | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Banks v. Jones
green
2 sentences2021Banks v. Jones, 2019 Ark. 204 , 575 S.W.3d 111 (citing Pearson v. Callahan, 555 U.S. 223 (2009)). 2021Banks v. Jones, 2019 Ark. 204 , 575 S.W.3d 111 (citing Pearson v. Callahan, 555 U.S. 223 (2009)). | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Smith v. BRT
green
2 sentences2008Applying these rules, Romine’s suit against Jurgens is therefore barred unless she has “asserted a constitutional violation, demonstrated the constitutional right is clearly established, and raised a genuine issue of fact as to whether the official would have known that the conduct violated that clearly established right.” Smith v. Brt, 363 Ark. at 131 , 211 S.W.3d at 489 ; see also Fegans v. Norris, supra; Baldridge v. Cordes, supra. Because of the interlocutory nature of this type of appeal, our court is limited to determining whether the law or right Jurgens is alleged to have violated was 2008Applying these rules, Romine’s suit against Jurgens is therefore barred unless she has “asserted a constitutional violation, demonstrated the constitutional right is clearly established, and raised a genuine issue of fact as to whether the official would have known that the conduct violated that clearly established right.” Smith v. Brt, 363 Ark. at 131 , 211 S.W.3d at 489 ; see also Fegans v. Norris, supra; Baldridge v. Cordes, supra. Because of the interlocutory nature of this type of appeal, our court is limited to determining whether the law or right Jurgens is alleged to have violated was | 1 | 2008–2008 |
City of Farmington v. Smith
green
2 sentences2008City of Farmington, 366 Ark. at 479 , 237 S.W.3d at 6 . 2008City of Farmington, 366 Ark. at 479 , 237 S.W.3d at 6 . | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Conn v. Gabbert
green
2 sentences2002A court deciding the issue of qualified immunity "must first determine whether the plaintiff has alleged the deprivation of an actual constitutional right at all, and if so, proceed to determine whether that right was clearly established at the time of the alleged violation." Pace v. City of Des Moines, 201 F.3d 1050 (2000); Conn v. Gabbert, 526 U.S. 286 , 119 S.Ct. 1292 , 143 L.Ed.2d 399 (1999). 2002A court deciding the issue of qualified immunity "must first determine whether the plaintiff has alleged the deprivation of an actual constitutional right at all, and if so, proceed to determine whether that right was clearly established at the time of the alleged violation." Pace v. City of Des Moines, 201 F.3d 1050 (2000); Conn v. Gabbert, 526 U.S. 286 , 119 S.Ct. 1292 , 143 L.Ed.2d 399 (1999). | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Elmer Pace and Linda Pace v. City of Des Moines, Iowa, and Brian Danner
green
2 sentences2002The Eighth Circuit, in Pace v. City of Des Moines, 201 F.3d 1050 (2000), recently held that a plaintiff can defeat a motion for summary judgment on the grounds of a qualified-immunity defense if the following three elements are present: 1) if the plaintiff has alleged a deprivation of an actual constitutional right; 2) if the right was clearly established at the time of the alleged violation; and 3) a genuine issue of fact as to whether the officer would have known that his/her alleged conduct would have violated plaintiffs rights. 2002A court deciding the issue of qualified immunity "must first determine whether the plaintiff has alleged the deprivation of an actual constitutional right at all, and if so, proceed to determine whether that right was clearly established at the time of the alleged violation." Pace v. City of Des Moines, 201 F.3d 1050 (2000); Conn v. Gabbert, 526 U.S. 286 , 119 S.Ct. 1292 , 143 L.Ed.2d 399 (1999). | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Harlow v. Fitzgerald
green
1 sentence1999Id. | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Sexton v. Supreme Court Committee on Professional Conduct
green
2 sentences1989Sexton v. Supreme Court Committee on Professional Conduct, 295 Ark. 141 , 747 S.W.2d 94 (1988). 1989Sexton v. Supreme Court Committee on Professional Conduct, 295 Ark. 141 , 747 S.W.2d 94 (1988). | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.