Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Georgia opinions name it 1 courts 1985–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Kimmelman v. Morrisongreen1 sentence2005“The reasonableness of counsel’s performance is to be evaluated from counsel’s perspective at the time of the alleged error and in light of all the circumstances. [Cit.]” Kimmelman v. Morrison, 477 U. S. 365, 384 (III) (A) (106 SC 2574, 91 LE2d 305) (1986). | 1 | 1 |
Mullins v. Lavoiegreen2 sentences1985Mullins v. Lavoie, 249 Ga. 411, 412 ( 290 SE2d 472 ) (1982). 1985Mullins v. Lavoie, 249 Ga. 411, 412 ( 290 SE2d 472 ) (1982). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Stewart v. State
green
2 sentences2018Thus, to convict a defendant of violating this statute, the State must prove that the road on which the defendant was driving at the time of the alleged violation was, in fact, "divided into two or more clearly marked lanes for traffic." See Stewart v. State , 288 Ga. App. 735 , 738 (3), 655 S.E.2d 328 (2007) (punctuation omitted). 2018Thus, to convict a defendant of violating this statute, the State must prove that the road on which the defendant was driving at the time of the alleged violation was, in fact, "divided into two or more clearly marked lanes for traffic." See Stewart v. State , 288 Ga. App. 735 , 738 (3), 655 S.E.2d 328 (2007) (punctuation omitted). | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Hinson v. Georgia State Board of Dental Examiners
green
2 sentences2004In Hinson v. Ga. State Bd. of Dental Examiners, 135 Ga. App. 488 ( 218 SE2d 162 ) (1975), we held that the intent of OCGA § 50-13-18 (c) is to give a licensee a hearing, and an opportunity to be heard where he can demonstrate that at the time of the alleged violation he was in full compliance with the law. 2004In Hinson v. Ga. State Bd. of Dental Examiners, 135 Ga. App. 488 ( 218 SE2d 162 ) (1975), we held that the intent of OCGA § 50-13-18 (c) is to give a licensee a hearing, and an opportunity to be heard where he can demonstrate that at the time of the alleged violation he was in full compliance with the law. | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Jackson v. Virginia
red
2 sentences1995Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct. 2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 . 1995Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct. 2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 . | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.