9 Alabama opinions name it 3 courts 1966–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alabama courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Holloman Ex Rel. Holloman v. Harlandgreen2 sentences2025Id. 'To overcome qualified immunity, the plaintiff must satisfy a two-prong test; he must show that: (1) the [public official] violated a constitutional right, and (2) this right was clearly established at the time of the alleged violation.' Id. 2025Id. 'To overcome qualified immunity, the plaintiff must satisfy a two-prong test; he must show that: (1) the [public official] violated a constitutional right, and (2) this right was clearly established at the time of the alleged violation.' Id. | 1 | 2 |
cluster 1120green1 sentence2014The second prong is satisfied if the plaintiff proves that “ ‘(1) the defendant violated a constitutional right, and (2) this right was clearly established at the time of the alleged violation.’ ” Townsend v. Jefferson Cnty., 601 F.3d 1152, 1158 (11th Cir.2010) (quoting Holloman ex rel. | 1 | 1 |
Foster v. Stategreen1 sentence2010See Foster v. State, 705 So.2d 534, 542 (Ala.Crim.App.1997) (holding that to preserve an alleged due-process violation for appellate review, an objection must be raised at the time of the alleged violation). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Strickland v. Washington
green
2 sentences1990Id., at 689 , 104 S.Ct., at 2065 . *1005 The defendant shows that he was prejudiced by his attorney's ineffectiveness by demonstrating that "there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different." Id., at 694 , 104 S.Ct. at 2068 . 1990Id., at 689 , 104 S.Ct., at 2065 . *1005 The defendant shows that he was prejudiced by his attorney's ineffectiveness by demonstrating that "there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different." Id., at 694 , 104 S.Ct. at 2068 . | 4 | 1988–1990 |
Nelson Realty Co. v. Darling Shop of Birmingham, Inc.
green
2 sentences1992Nelson Realty Co. v. Darling Shop of Birmingham , 267 Ala. 301 , 101 So.2d 78 (1958); Brown-Marx Assocs., Ltd. v. Emigrant Sav. 1992Nelson Realty Co. v. Darling Shop of Birmingham , 267 Ala. 301 , 101 So.2d 78 (1958); Brown-Marx Assocs., Ltd. v. Emigrant Sav. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Mooradian v. Canal Insurance Company
green
2 sentences1966Nor is the doctrine of equitable estoppel as stated in Mooradian v. Canal Insurance Co., 272 Ala. 373 , 130 So.2d 915 , applicable: “Several elements must be present before the courts will invoke an equitable estoppel. 1966Nor is the doctrine of equitable estoppel as stated in Mooradian v. Canal Insurance Co., 272 Ala. 373 , 130 So.2d 915 , applicable: “Several elements must be present before the courts will invoke an equitable estoppel. | 1 | 1966–1966 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.