14 New Jersey opinions name it 2 courts 1977–2025 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Badessagreen2 sentences2025"The attenuation doctrine is an example of an exception to the exclusionary rule" and "examines whether the connection between the constitutional violation and the evidence is 'so attenuated as to dissipate the taint from the unlawful conduct.'" State v. Herrerra, 211 N.J. 308, 331 (2012) (quoting State v. Badessa, 185 N.J. 303, 311 (2005)) (internal quotation marks omitted). 2025Super. 545 , 550 n.1 (App. Div. 2005); and then quoting State v. Badessa, 185 N.J. 303, 311 (2005)). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Herrerragreen2 sentences2025"The attenuation doctrine is an example of an exception to the exclusionary rule" and "examines whether the connection between the constitutional violation and the evidence is 'so attenuated as to dissipate the taint from the unlawful conduct.'" State v. Herrerra, 211 N.J. 308, 331 (2012) (quoting State v. Badessa, 185 N.J. 303, 311 (2005)) (internal quotation marks omitted). 2025"The attenuation doctrine is an example of an exception to the exclusionary rule " and "examines whether the connection between the constitutional violation and the evidence is 'so attenuated as to dissipate the taint from the unlawful conduct.'" State v. Herrerra, 211 N.J. 308, 331 (2012) (first citing State v. Ball, 381 N.J. | 2 | 2 |
Tretina Printing, Inc. v. Fitzpatrick & Associates, Inc.green2 sentences2024In addition, the Court indicated there may be other ["]'rare circumstances' . . . . where public policy would require appellate court review," including cases where review is necessary for it to carry out its "supervisory function over the courts." Ibid. (quoting Tretina Printing, Inc. v. Fitzpatrick & Assocs., Inc., 135 N.J. 349, 364-65 (1994)). 2019In addition, the Court indicated there may be other "'rare circumstances' . . . . where public policy would require appellate court review," including cases where review is necessary for it to carry out its "supervisory A-0319-17T1 6 function over the courts." Ibid. (quoting Tretina Printing, Inc. v. Fitzpatrick & Assocs., Inc., 135 N.J. 349, 364-65 (1994)). | 2 | 2 |
Mt. Hope Development Associates v. Mt. Hope Waterpower Project, L.P.green2 sentences2024Hope Development Associates, 154 N.J. at 152 ], our Supreme Court identified a child support order as an example of such an exception. 2019Hope Waterpower Project, LP, 154 N.J. 141, 152 (1998), our Supreme Court identified a child support order as an example of such an exception. | 1 | 2 |
State v. Johnsongreen1 sentence2025In evaluating attenuation, this court weighs three factors: "(1) the temporal proximity between the illegal conduct and the challenged evidence; (2) A-2905-23 17 the presence of intervening circumstances; and (3) the flagrancy and purpose of the police misconduct." State v. Johnson, 118 N.J. 639, 653 (1990). | 1 | 1 |
Matter of Nacksongreen2 sentences1997See id. at 503 , 493 A.2d 1239 ; N.J.R.E. 504(2)(a); see also In re Nackson, 114 N.J. 527, 532-37 , 555 A.2d 1101 (1989) (interpreting “crime or fraud” exception). 1997See id. at 503 , 493 A.2d 1239 ; N.J.R.E. 504(2)(a); see also In re Nackson, 114 N.J. 527, 532-37 , 555 A.2d 1101 (1989) (interpreting “crime or fraud” exception). | 1 | 1 |
Fellerman v. Bradleygreen2 sentences1997See id. at 503 , 493 A.2d 1239 ; N.J.R.E. 504(2)(a); see also In re Nackson, 114 N.J. 527, 532-37 , 555 A.2d 1101 (1989) (interpreting “crime or fraud” exception). 1997See id. at 503 , 493 A.2d 1239 ; N.J.R.E. 504(2)(a); see also In re Nackson, 114 N.J. 527, 532-37 , 555 A.2d 1101 (1989) (interpreting “crime or fraud” exception). | 1 | 1 |
Frost & Frost Trucking Co. v. Railroad Comm'n of Cal.green2 sentences1991Accord Frost v. California Railroad Comm'n, 271 U.S. 583 , 46 S.Ct. 605 , 70 L.Ed. 1101 (1926). 1991Accord Frost v. California Railroad Comm'n, 271 U.S. 583 , 46 S.Ct. 605 , 70 L.Ed. 1101 (1926). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Ball
green
2 sentences2025"The attenuation doctrine is an example of an exception to the exclusionary rule " and "examines whether the connection between the constitutional violation and the evidence is 'so attenuated as to dissipate the taint from the unlawful conduct.'" State v. Herrerra, 211 N.J. 308, 331 (2012) (first citing State v. Ball, 381 N.J. 2012Ball, supra, 381 N.J.Super. at 550 n. 1, 887 A.2d 174 . | 2 | 2012–2025 |
Graham v. Gielchinsky
green
1 sentence2017Ibid. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Matter of Conroy
green
2 sentences2013For an example of this principle, see In re Conroy, 98 N.J. 321 , 344 n. 2, 486 A.2d 1209 (1985), in which the New Jersey Supreme Court resolved difficult issues concerning the termination of life support and the constitutional right to refuse medical treatment, even though there were legislative attempts to address those issues pending in the Legislature at the time. 2013For an example of this principle, see In re Conroy, 98 N.J. 321 , 344 n. 2, 486 A.2d 1209 (1985), in which the New Jersey Supreme Court resolved difficult issues concerning the termination of life support and the constitutional right to refuse medical treatment, even though there were legislative attempts to address those issues pending in the Legislature at the time. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Montgomery v. Wilmerding
neutral
2 sentences2007The trial court cited Montgomery v. Wilmerding, 26 N.J.Super. 214 , 97 A. 2d 745 (Ch.Div.1953), as an example of this principle. 2007The trial court cited Montgomery v. Wilmerding, 26 N.J.Super. 214 , 97 A. 2d 745 (Ch.Div.1953), as an example of this principle. | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Loechner v. Campoli
green
2 sentences2005B In Loechner , the plaintiff and her husband acquired title as tenants by the entirety to three adjoining lots on which their house was situated. 49 N.J. at 507 , 231 A.2d 553 . 2005B In Loechner , the plaintiff and her husband acquired title as tenants by the entirety to three adjoining lots on which their house was situated. 49 N.J. at 507 , 231 A.2d 553 . | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Hambright v. Yglesias
green
2 sentences1997An example of the analysis we applied is Hambright v. Yglesias, 200 N.J.Super. 392, 395 , 491 A.2d 768 (App.Div.1985). 1997An example of the analysis we applied is Hambright v. Yglesias, 200 N.J.Super. 392, 395 , 491 A.2d 768 (App.Div.1985). | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Kutcher v. Housing Authority of City of Newark
green
2 sentences1991In terms of due process, the holding is an example of the principle that a state "may not condition a privilege which it may deny altogether on a surrender of constitutional right." Kutcher v. Newark Housing Authority, 20 N.J. 181, 188-189 , 119 A. 2d 1 (1955). 1991In terms of due process, the holding is an example of the principle that a state "may not condition a privilege which it may deny altogether on a surrender of constitutional right." Kutcher v. Newark Housing Authority, 20 N.J. 181, 188-189 , 119 A. 2d 1 (1955). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
General Assembly of State of New Jersey v. Byrne
green
2 sentences1982When tested by the principles decided today in General Assembly v. Byrne, 90 N.J. 376 (1982), the New Jersey Building Authority Act, N.J.S.A. 52:18A-78.1, et seq., includes a classic example of a violation of the state constitutional requirement of separation of powers by enabling the Legislature to control an executive agency’s essential functions. 1982When tested by the principles decided today in General Assembly v. Byrne, 90 N.J. 376 (1982), the New Jersey Building Authority Act, N.J.S.A. 52:18A-78.1, et seq., includes a classic example of a violation of the state constitutional requirement of separation of powers by enabling the Legislature to control an executive agency's essential functions. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
American Yearbook Company v. Askew
green
1 sentence1977Ed. 2d at 234 ] An earlier example of the analysis followed in Alexandria Scrap is found in American Yearbook Company v. Askew, 339 F. Supp. 719 (M. | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.